Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Psycho Homo's

Robert Jan

New member
It's pretty much common knowledge that the percentage of homosexuals amongst serial killers, psychopaths and other crazy people is significantly higher than of the general population.

Do you think this is because of the way society treats homosexuality, or is there something else?

I'd like some homo opinions too.
 
I think it is more cause they got f'd with bigtime in their younger years as is often the case....

their "homosexuality" is probably more a symptom of such experiences and more of a twisted sense of sexuality and NOT like more typical homosexuality...
 
Becoming said:
I think it is more cause they got f'd with bigtime in their younger years as is often the case....

their "homosexuality" is probably more a symptom of such experiences and more of a twisted sense of sexuality and NOT like more typical homosexuality...

Yep... homos would get the shit beat out of them daily in gym class, on the bus, in the hallway etc.. I am sure this can make someone very psychotic.
 
The_Eviscerator said:
Yep... homos would get the shit beat out of them daily in gym class, on the bus, in the hallway etc.. I am sure this can make someone very psychotic.

Is this a USA thing?.. I know several out of the closet teenage homo's and none of them were ever battered or anything. Most say when they came out they regretted ever hiding it.
 
Robert Jan said:
Is this a USA thing?.. I know several out of the closet teenage homo's and none of them were ever battered or anything. Most say when they came out they regretted ever hiding it.

yes I feel pretty sure it is a USA thing

it happened so much (although seems like less recently) they were even doing "made for TV" movies about it
 
The_Eviscerator said:
Yep... homos would get the shit beat out of them daily in gym class, on the bus, in the hallway etc.. I am sure this can make someone very psychotic.

LOL....

RJ - no not cause homos are beat up...

a lot of times future psychos are abused (which often involves sexual abuse) and it causes them to have a warped sense of sexuality...

of course then their are the jeffrey dahmers who are born to end up fucked up with no abuse... and he had his own warped sexuality he developed all on his own... and he also happened to be homosexual... it woudl be better to ask why was he as an example...
 
Robert Jan said:
Is this a USA thing?.. I know several out of the closet teenage homo's and none of them were ever battered or anything. Most say when they came out they regretted ever hiding it.

Must be... it is just a tradition to beat the shit out of homos. Especially in blue collar towns like Pittsburgh, Cleveland etc... We used to play a football game called "Smeer the Queer." Basically it was kill the man with the ball.

I think Europe is probably not as fearful of homosexuality. Most of the men there are kind of metrosexual already. Try being slightly fruity in a town like Pittsburgh and you can expect abuse. Even tanning is considered gay in a blue collar town.
 
The_Eviscerator said:
Most of the men there are kind of metrosexual already. Try being slightly fruity in a town like Pittsburgh and you can expect abuse. Even tanning is considered gay in a blue collar town.

I took some Americans to a bar in Greece and they weren't sure if I had taken them to a gay bar.

Saying we're all metro is a gross exaggeration though. Lots of rugged man-men here too
 
Becoming said:
LOL....

RJ - no not cause homos are beat up...

a lot of times future psychos are abused (which often involves sexual abuse) and it causes them to have a warped sense of sexuality...

of course then their are the jeffrey dahmers who are born to end up fucked up with no abuse... and he had his own warped sexuality he developed all on his own... and he also happened to be homosexual... it woudl be better to ask why was he as an example...

Dahmer intrigues me. Like many people, I imagine.
 
Robert Jan said:
I took some Americans to a bar in Greece and they weren't sure if I had taken them to a gay bar.

Saying we're all metro is a gross exaggeration though. Lots of rugged man-men here too

I believe you... I just think Europeans are generally more stylish. Americans in a blue collar town are very shielded from style and the gay culture.

BTW, I thought all Greeks went both ways anyway.
;)
 
The_Eviscerator said:
Must be... it is just a tradition to beat the shit out of homos. Especially in blue collar towns like Pittsburgh, Cleveland etc... We used to play a football game called "Smeer the Queer." Basically it was kill the man with the ball.

I think Europe is probably not as fearful of homosexuality. Most of the men there are kind of metrosexual already. Try being slightly fruity in a town like Pittsburgh and you can expect abuse. Even tanning is considered gay in a blue collar town.

Actually I revise my previous post - on second though I guess it is true, homos get beat up a lot...

but so do a lot of people we call "fags" or "gay" who may or may not be homosexual....
 
The_Eviscerator said:
Must be... it is just a tradition to beat the shit out of homos. Especially in blue collar towns like Pittsburgh, Cleveland etc... We used to play a football game called "Smeer the Queer." Basically it was kill the man with the ball.

I think Europe is probably not as fearful of homosexuality. Most of the men there are kind of metrosexual already. Try being slightly fruity in a town like Pittsburgh and you can expect abuse. Even tanning is considered gay in a blue collar town.

The dirty rugged man attitude is part of the reason for the huge increase in female "bisexuality"in the USA. Most women like or grow to like tenderness and kindness and understanding in their lover and don't find it in women. What do bi women say when asked why they like having sex with women?

They say... there is no pressure. it is soft and personal and emotional.

I.O.W. they don't want mr Guns 'n Ammo every day.
 
The_Eviscerator said:
BTW, I thought all Greeks went both ways anyway.
;)
Don't forget the sheep! :D



Robert Jan said:
The dirty rugged man attitude is part of the reason for the huge increase in female "bisexuality"in the USA. Most women like or grow to like tenderness and kindness and understanding in their lover and don't find it in women. What do bi women say when asked why they like having sex with women?
I have heard some people theorize men base their sexuality on what they are attracted to... so they are either only gay or straight in reality (I guess some could like the tweeners)... they also say all women choose by needs fullfillment potential, and so all are potentially bi...

it is prolly a bunch of nonsense tho...
 
Becoming said:
Don't forget the sheep! :D



I have heard some people theorize men base their sexuality on what they are attracted to... so they are either only gay or straight in reality (I guess some could like the tweeners)... they also say all women choose by needs fullfillment potential, and so all are potentially bi...

it is prolly a bunch of nonsense tho...

I think the theory makes sense... it works... It explains the phenomenon.
 
Robert Jan said:
I think the theory makes sense... it works... It explains the phenomenon.

Yeah I agree it makes sense, but the psych people like to pull a lot of shit out of their ass cause you can't prove much of it...

biggest profession for quacks if ever there was one....
 
Robert Jan said:
I agree on psychs. so does Richard Feynman

Pseudoscience.
You will like this story...

I had this one prof tell me once in undergrad (my bs was in neurobiology/neuropsychology) that since you can localize the area like say where musical composition occurs at, then theoretically you could tell which people are more musically gifted by scanning them and seeing who had bigger neural locuses or area of activation upon such activities...

I raised my hand and and told her that this was wrong in theory and in its basic premises because: 1) music is a subjective ART and not an objective measurable ability and 2) it sounds a lot like Phrenology if you want to step back to the middle ages...

Scary thing was she was a big Psych guru and an adviser to the UN and a bunch of other international organizations (other self appointed geniuses :rolleyes: )..

I was the best student in the class and the bitch gave me a C for Pwning her ass in class (not the only time I put her in her place, but it had to be done she was so high on herself)...

it was worth it... :)
 
I'm not actually sure I agree. there is a certain measurable aspect to musical talent. Those who deny this are the ones that are fans of crappy music like rap and r&b.

Somebody can either hold a beat or they can't
Somebody can either distinguish tones or they can't
Somebody can either duplicate a melody they heard on an instrument or even humming or they can't.

Look at how intelligent all the great classical composers were. There a great rational and even scientific aspect to music. Look at how strongly inherited musical talent is. There are whole dynasties. Even when raised in another family these genes tend to pop up.

there is an anatomical difference, most likely.
 
Robert Jan said:
I'm not actually sure I agree. there is a certain measurable aspect to musical talent. Those who deny this are the ones that are fans of crappy music like rap and r&b.
Again this is subjective - someone decided and TOLD you it was great music

Robert Jan said:
Somebody can either hold a beat or they can't
Somebody can either distinguish tones or they can't
Somebody can either duplicate a melody they heard on an instrument or even humming or they can't.
I will actually agree with this

Robert Jan said:
Look at how intelligent all the great classical composers were. There a great rational and even scientific aspect to music. Look at how strongly inherited musical talent is. There are whole dynasties. Even when raised in another family these genes tend to pop up.
And some are not very intelligent at all... there is a big scientific aspect, but science alone by formula has failed to produce truly moving pieces...
As far as "dynasties", could it be that money and opportunity and access because of money are just as responsible as any particular talent level? Hell sure no one would say it is great I am sure but Paris Hilton is making a record because of money and access... I am sure it is not great, but she has the access which many will never have no matter how intelligent or talented...

Either way you would have to tie this to thousands of studies before you could even think to say something like this... and just cause one has a larger neural locus activated - what if those neurons were less efficient, or in a person with a smaller locus, what if they are more efficient?

There are lots of problems with this theory....
 
I'm not saying this is proven. Just speculating. I understand the danger of pseudoscience and premature conclusions.

I don't think the family pattern in musical talent is purely nurture. I think there is empirical evidence.
 
Robert Jan said:
I'm not saying this is proven. Just speculating. I understand the danger of pseudoscience and premature conclusions.

I don't think the family pattern in musical talent is purely nurture. I think there is empirical evidence.

I got ya...
 
Top Bottom