Prohormone/steroid Q

[ReggieJ]

Given unlimited money and ignoring side effects is there any reason to believe that stacking offers advantages over taking an equivalent dosage of just a single potent compound, e.g. 1 gram of 1-testosterone vs 500grams of 1-t and 500 grams of 4-ad? Or in the steroid analogy 1 gram of dianabol versus a combined 1 gram of dianabol/deca?

 

[Bill Llewellyn]

Given unlimited money and ignoring side effects is there any reason to believe that stacking offers advantages over taking an equivalent dosage of just a single potent compound, e.g. 1 gram of 1-testosterone vs 500grams of 1-t and 500 grams of 4-ad? Or in the steroid analogy 1 gram of dianabol versus a combined 1 gram of dianabol/deca?

If you are looking for mass, a mix of 1-test and 4-AD would be preferred because the 4-AD brings with it some well-needed estrogen. If you are looking for lean muscularity on the other hand, I'd go with 1-Test alone.

- Bill Llewellyn

 

[Par Deus]

Given unlimited money and ignoring side effects is there any reason to believe that stacking offers advantages over taking an equivalent dosage of just a single potent compound, e.g. 1 gram of 1-testosterone vs 500grams of 1-t and 500 grams of 4-ad? Or in the steroid analogy 1 gram of dianabol versus a combined 1 gram of dianabol/deca?

The 500 grams + 500 grams will be vastly superior to the 1 gram.

 

[bpdaddy]

Re: Re: Prohormone/steroid Q

If you are looking for mass, a mix of 1-test and 4-AD would be preferred because the 4-AD brings with it some well-needed estrogen. If you are looking for lean muscularity on the other hand, I'd go with 1-Test alone.

- Bill Llewellyn

Would you say then 1-test is better than 1-AD in your opinion? I know PA's take on it

 

[ReggieJ]

Sorry I should have been clear. The goal of the trainee in this case is "true" muscle gain rather than water weight. In this case do you still think 500 + 500 would be better Par?

 

[Bill Llewellyn]

Re: Re: Re: Prohormone/steroid Q

Would you say then 1-test is better than 1-AD in your opinion? I know PA's take on it

Yes, of course. Just as test is better than androstenediol..That is not to say they are worlds apart though; the feedback on both compounds is typically very good. I assume that 1-AD has some measureable intrinsic activity. Just not as much as 1-Test of course.

- Bill Llewellyn

 

[voodoo]

Many compounds work well when combined. That is very noticable with gear, where the whole is greater then the sum of its parts.

Many people have lower sex drive on some of these compounds, while others may increase it. This would make a stack very desireable

 

[Par Deus]

Sorry I should have been clear. The goal of the trainee in this case is "true" muscle gain rather than water weight. In this case do you still think 500 + 500 would be better Par?

In that case, I still say 1000 grams will produce better gains than 1 gram.

 

[bpdaddy]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Prohormone/steroid Q

Yes, of course. Just as test is better than androstenediol..That is not to say they are worlds apart though; the feedback on both compounds is typically very good. I assume that 1-AD has some measureable intrinsic activity. Just not as much as 1-Test of course.

- Bill Llewellyn

Are we talkin the Ethergels? Or Biotest 1-T? I would assume Ethergels

Thanks Mate

 

[triggerfinger]

Given unlimited money and ignoring side effects is there any reason to believe that stacking offers advantages over taking an equivalent dosage of just a single potent compound, e.g. 1 gram of 1-testosterone vs 500grams of 1-t and 500 grams of 4-ad? Or in the steroid analogy 1 gram of dianabol versus a combined 1 gram of dianabol/deca?

Reggie do you mean :


1 gram( 1000 mg) of 1-test vs 500 mg of 1-test + 500 mg of 4ad