interesting - yeah theres too much other stuff in me now for the tests to mean anything, but maybe when I'm relatively clean I'll bridge with Primo and get some bloodwork benchmarks.bilter said:I have done a lot of research on this very subject. I can only go by what others have had for experiences (I always stack my primo with var so I can not give an accurate assessment). Most that I have questioned (people that have the same concerns as you and I and get a lipid profile done pre, post and during cycle) have found little to no affects on blood lipids with a primo only cycle. Dosages ranges from 400mg PW to 800mg PW. Changes (in those that had them) do not appear to be dose dependant. For the sake of info if you would get a lipid profile done pre, post and during I would be very interested in the results you get.
BTW, my last cycle (400mg primo PW / 50mg var PD) brought my ldl from 82 down to 26 in just 2 weeks. BUt I am sure the var was the cause. My total went from 211 down to 162 but the drop was mainly due to decreased HDL.
lol sorry bro - Georges new system has had the unintended consequence of everybody needing to spread no-cost red K to be able to hit green again. I only got you for 10%.badslinky said:No primo does not act in a similiar fashion as oxan.. primo is good for the lipids... Ill find the article for you. Thanks for the bomb bro.(some people like drama)
galaxy said:I was on 1g test and 400mgs of eq and brought my hdl up to a 36 from 6. Ive been running half that test currently and 50mgs of var and my hdl has gone back down to 28. I was kinda shocked and i think ill blame the var for that. On a whole my cholesterol was 119 so i was happy.
galaxy said:I take crestor and just added the non flush niacin. I think ill add the garlic too. I used to buy the 1g kyolic tabs.
bilter said:just for information purposes, I did read a study that stated that non flush niaicin was not effective at raising HDL. Regular niacin on the other hand was very effective. In the study they were giving the test subjects 1 asperin 1 hour prior to administration of niacin to combat the flushing effects. Keep in mind niacin, at dosages that have a positive affect on lipids, is hard on the liver.
Ulter said:Non-flush is ineffective. Use Red Yeast Rice at night with Polycosinol.
But the wrong discussion is taking place here. There is no evidence anywhere that short term fluctuations in lipids cause CAD. Even the evidence in long term poor lipids is incomplete because it doesn't take into account the lifestyle of the subjects in the study. The major studies on cholesterol levels being an indicator of future CAD were funded by the companies that sell statins.
When you do a study to determine if lipid profiles are an indicator of future CAD you can't ignore lifestyle. If the subjects eat foods that give them a bad profile throughout their lives but are active and exercise regularly the numbers drop like a rock. Most of the conclusions about lipid profiles were on sedentary and "bad diet" people. Well of course those people are going to be susceptible to CAD later in life. There is case after case, the most famous being David Letterman, of men who had perfect lipid profiles all their lives and still had a heart attack. And vice versa, there are millions of people with poor lipid profiles living CAD free into their 80's and 90's.
Down off soapbox....
The point is that you guys are worrying about lipid profiles during your cycle and it's silly because you're not sedentary, and you're coming off and they go back to normal.
back to normal. CAD takes many years to develop, not 8-10 weeks of a cycle.
Ulter said:Non-flush is ineffective.
........
The point is that you guys are worrying about lipid profiles during your cycle and it's silly because you're not sedentary, and you're coming off and they go back to normal.
back to normal. CAD takes many years to develop, not 8-10 weeks of a cycle.
maybe 10 week cruises in between cycles lol.Ulter said:Non-flush is ineffective. Use Red Yeast Rice at night with Polycosinol.
But the wrong discussion is taking place here. There is no evidence anywhere that short term fluctuations in lipids cause CAD. Even the evidence in long term poor lipids is incomplete because it doesn't take into account the lifestyle of the subjects in the study. The major studies on cholesterol levels being an indicator of future CAD were funded by the companies that sell statins.
When you do a study to determine if lipid profiles are an indicator of future CAD you can't ignore lifestyle. If the subjects eat foods that give them a bad profile throughout their lives but are active and exercise regularly the numbers drop like a rock. Most of the conclusions about lipid profiles were on sedentary and "bad diet" people. Well of course those people are going to be susceptible to CAD later in life. There is case after case, the most famous being David Letterman, of men who had perfect lipid profiles all their lives and still had a heart attack. And vice versa, there are millions of people with poor lipid profiles living CAD free into their 80's and 90's.
Down off soapbox....
The point is that you guys are worrying about lipid profiles during your cycle and it's silly because you're not sedentary, and you're coming off and they go back to normal.
back to normal. CAD takes many years to develop, not 8-10 weeks of a cycle.[/QUOTE
Poit taken Ulter. My concern has always been what the cumulative effect of cycling (yes just 2-4 10 weekers per year) has on CAD. I just made the assumption (with noresearch to back it up) that if my lipid levels were out of wack even for just 10 weeks I maybe depooting plaque on my arterial walls. Now, admittedly I am lucky in that I have a naturally high HDL level that I reason helps clean up the mess between cycles but I still try to minimize the impact whenever possible through supplimentation and careful selection of AAS.
Ulter said:1. Where is your proof of that? Where is your proof that more men who are pros die at a rate higher than the general population? You're also forgetting that those who do have episodes are ALL abusing painkillers and/or rec drugs. Unlike the general population.
3. I didn't post about Inositol Hexaniacinate
Ulter said:1. Where is your proof of that? Where is your proof that more men who are pros die at a rate higher than the general population? You're also forgetting that those who do have episodes are ALL abusing painkillers and/or rec drugs. Unlike the general population.
2. I know
3. I didn't post about Inositol Hexaniacinate
wootool said:deposition of plaque is a day-to-day proposition. CV disease is a result of these cumulative deposits.
logically, during your impaired HDL periods whether it be 10 weeks or 30 weeks, you'll be depositing more plaque than you would under normal conditions controlling for other factors such as diet and activity level.
whether this is sufficient over time to make a difference in lifespan I guess is unknown but clearly you'll be worse off CV-wise for having cycled.
lets boil it down.Triple J said:your assumption here is an over-simplification. based on this theory one would expect a nearly homogenous distribution of deposits throughout the body. this is never the case. i know, i've done the dissections on cadavers.
first you need damage to the inner lining of the vessel. this takes place in areas of higher turbulence. a risk factor here would be high blood pressure. once damage occurs this sets of an imflammatory reaction that leads to plaque deposition. risk factors here include a physiology that favors run-away inflammation (a chronic problem in aging americans), combined with high circulating LDLs. HDLs being protective, of course
I've been trying to drive this point home for yearsjronimoe15 said:Based on some of these comments, why does everyone say Var is so safe it drives your HDLs to hell?????
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










