Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Please Critque Quads Day!

JKurz1

Banned
COnfused on proper rep schema and sets for mass....BODYBULDER OFFSEASON PROGRAM?

SQUATS
WARMUP X 12
WORKING SETS:
10,8,6,3-4 --< ENOUGH? OR DO I NEED MORE IN THE LOWER RANGE?

WALKING DBELL LUNGE ACROSS GYM FLOOR X 3
(is there a difference between barbell v. debell?

LEG PRESS X 4
10,10,8,8

LEG EXT
12,10,8,8,6

CALVES AND THE ABS

THANKS BROS............
 
I'm not sure what to reccomend regarding the rep range... seems good.

Just stick with a rep range (as posted) and as long as the overall workload is up there (enough weight to be good stimulous) and you can increase a few pounds a week you'll grow with enough food.

Lunges with barbell or dumbell... added weight is added weight, whatevers more comfortable to you... however, walking lunges may be easier with DB's.
 
JKurz1 said:
COnfused on proper rep schema and sets for mass....BODYBULDER OFFSEASON PROGRAM?

SQUATS
WARMUP X 12
WORKING SETS:
10,8,6,3-4 --< ENOUGH? OR DO I NEED MORE IN THE LOWER RANGE?

WALKING DBELL LUNGE ACROSS GYM FLOOR X 3
(is there a difference between barbell v. debell?

LEG PRESS X 4
10,10,8,8

LEG EXT
12,10,8,8,6

CALVES AND THE ABS

THANKS BROS............
I was just reading about rep ranges in an article by Tom Venuto that basically states :

"So here’s the take home lesson: If you’re an athlete and your primary goal is strength and power for improved sports performance, then a good majority of your training is going to be in the 1-5 rep range. This will help make you stronger, faster and more powerful without adding muscle bulk. If you’re a bodybuilder and your primary goal is muscle mass, then the majority of your training should be done in the 6-12 rep range, but you should also do a little bit of training in the 3-5 rep range for power and strength, which will later facilitate hypertrophy (and prevent the powerlifters from making fun of you), and you should do a little bit of training in the 13-20+ rep range to facilitate the development of slow twitch muscle fiber, build mitochondrial density and increase capillarization."

I do agree esp. with the last statement about the 6-12.

About the lunges I suppose it's about preference... maybe alternate the two to see which you prefer. Some find it easier to hold a weight than to have it across the back.

Here's more from the article for those interested on the biological explanation re: rep ranges:

"The primary difference between the effects of rep ranges on the adaptive response depends on whether the load affects neural factors (low reps) or metabolic factors (higher reps). When you train with low reps (1 – 5), the adaptations that make you stronger are mostly neurological: You develop an increased ability to recruit more muscle fibers, you stimulate the higher threshold fibers that are not activated with high rep, low weight sets, you decrease neuromuscular inhibition, and there is increased coordination between the muscle groups. However, with low reps, the hypertrophy (size increase) of the muscle fibers is minimal.

In other words, reps under 6 make you stronger, but they don’t necessarily make you bigger because the strength gains come from adaptations in the nervous system – the muscle fibers and other muscle cell structures do not hypertrophy (enlarge). This explains why certain athletes, powerlifters and Olympic lifters can be wicked strong but they don’t look as strong as they are.

When you train with medium reps (6-12) the adaptations are more metabolic and cellular and only moderately neurological. This is why 6-12 reps is the range most often recommended for bodybuilding and hypertrophy. You get bigger and stronger in this rep range, but your strength gains are not maximal. This explains why some bodybuilders look stronger than they are (and why they are often the brunt of jokes made by powerlifters and weight lifters; i.e. “big, weak, slow, useless muscles”, ha ha).

When you train with higher reps (13-20+), the adaptations are mostly metabolic and cellular. This rep range produces local muscular endurance, a small degree of hypertrophy in certain cellular components such as the mitochondria and the capillaries, and very little strength.

There is not a distinct line where neural adaptations end and structural/metabolic adaptations begin; rather it is a continuum, like temperature or colors of a rainbow.

For example, when you train in the 6-8 rep range, the adaptations are still somewhat neural, but also metabolic/structural: In this rep range, you get excellent strength gains and also excellent hypertrophy. In the 8-12 rep range, there is still some neural adaptation, but less than the 6-8 range and much less than the 1-5 range. The advantage of the 8-12 rep range is that you get maximal hypertrophy (this is the best rep range for pure size increases when strength is not the number one concern). You will also get stronger, of course, but not nearly to the degree as you would training with lower reps.


Rep range Percent of 1 rep max Training Effect Goal desired
-----------------------------------------------------------
1-5 reps 85-100% Neural Strength & power little hypertrophy
6-8 reps 75-85% Neural & metabolic Strength & Hypertrophy
9-12 reps 70-75% Metabolic & Neural Hypertrophy & some strength
13-20+ reps 60-70% Metabolic local endurance some hypertrophy, little strength


Now, what exactly happens inside the muscle to make it get bigger and not necessarily stronger? Quite simply, ALL the structures inside the muscle cell grow when exposed to the appropriate training stimulus.

Remember back in high school when you had to memorize those diagrams of cellular anatomy (or you would get an F in the class)? There were all kinds of organelles and cell structures such as the endoplasmic reticulum, the mitochondria, the golgi complex, ribosomes, centrioles, Lysosomes, and cytoplasm. Remember all that stuff?

If you’re anything like me, you defied your biology teacher to explain the reason why you had to memorize all that crap and what good it would do you in the "real world." Well, now that you're in the "real world" and you want strength and muscles, here you go:

A muscle cell has all the same cell structures as other body cells, and they all take up space. When speaking of the muscle cell, you mostly hear about the mitochondria (the cellular powerhouse where energy production takes place), the myofibrils (the actual muscle fibers themselves) and the fluid inside the cell (called cytoplasm in other body cells, or in the case of the muscle cell, its called sarcoplasm).

Myofibrillar hypertrophy is caused most effectively in the 6-8 rep range. This contributes to the most visible increases in muscle mass and cross sectional width. However, that doesn’t mean you should only train in the 6-8 rep range. If you want to make the other "stuff" in the muscle cell grow as well, you should train in all rep ranges. The mitochondria and sarcoplasm also take up a substantial amount of space in the muscle cell and they are best stimulated with high reps. High rep training can also stimulate increased capillarization in the muscle (just ask former Mr. Universe and Mr. Legs himself, Tom Platz, about the effectiveness of high rep leg training done in addition to the low and medium rep training).

In addition, there is more than one type of muscle fiber: you have slow twitch (type I) and fast twitch (type IIa and IIb). Slow twitch muscle fibers also hypertrophy from higher reps (although they have the least potential for size increases, which is why you should spend more time below 13 reps if it's muscle mass you're after).

So here’s the take home lesson: If you’re an athlete and your primary goal is strength and power for improved sports performance, then a good majority of your training is going to be in the 1-5 rep range. This will help make you stronger, faster and more powerful without adding muscle bulk. If you’re a bodybuilder and your primary goal is muscle mass, then the majority of your training should be done in the 6-12 rep range, but you should also do a little bit of training in the 3-5 rep range for power and strength, which will later facilitate hypertrophy (and prevent the powerlifters from making fun of you), and you should do a little bit of training in the 13-20+ rep range to facilitate the development of slow twitch muscle fiber, build mitochondrial density and increase capillarization."
 
Kurz, I know it's nutty reading all the bodybuilding literature .....

Kurz, I know it's nutty reading all the supposed bodybuilding literature and some people say 'this many reps are for strength, and this is for mass, and this is to maintain and this tempo is for blah, blah, blah'......is any of it true? do you really care about a study performed on untrained 18 year olds?? My long-standing opinion is that it is all nonsense.
Working in a purely neural rep-range is not historically good for stimulating hypertrophy, a purely neural range would be all out and low-volume singles, doubles, or triples. Other than that, I don't think it matters so long as you're between 4-12 (staying out of endurance work and keeping the weight significant enough ; ie not doing 35 reps with 45lbs on barbell curls or something) and you're consistent with it and add weight to the bar consistently.
 
BiggT said:
Kurz, I know it's nutty reading all the supposed bodybuilding literature and some people say 'this many reps are for strength, and this is for mass, and this is to maintain and this tempo is for blah, blah, blah'......is any of it true? do you really care about a study performed on untrained 18 year olds?? My long-standing opinion is that it is all nonsense.

Working in a purely neural rep-range is not historically good for stimulating hypertrophy, a purely neural range would be all out and low-volume singles, doubles, or triples. Other than that, I don't think it matters so long as you're between 4-10 (staying out of endurance work and keeping the weight significant enough ; ie not doing 35 reps with 45lbs on barbell curls or something) and you're consistent with it and add weight to the bar consistently.
:) Then you're gonna love the article I just posted :evil: :)
 
BiggT said:
Kurz, I know it's nutty reading all the bodybuilding literature .....

Kurz, I know it's nutty reading all the supposed bodybuilding literature and some people say 'this many reps are for strength, and this is for mass, and this is to maintain and this tempo is for blah, blah, blah'......is any of it true? do you really care about a study performed on untrained 18 year olds?? My long-standing opinion is that it is all nonsense.
Working in a purely neural rep-range is not historically good for stimulating hypertrophy, a purely neural range would be all out and low-volume singles, doubles, or triples. Other than that, I don't think it matters so long as you're between 4-12 (staying out of endurance work and keeping the weight significant enough ; ie not doing 35 reps with 45lbs on barbell curls or something) and you're consistent with it and add weight to the bar consistently.
so my layout is good tONE?
 
*Bunny* said:
:) Then you're gonna love the article I just posted :evil: :)

I can't say I disagree with the whole article, I think it more or less says 6-12 reps generally promote hypertrophy, I'd even say from my own experience it is more like 4-12.....just not neural and not endurance. People do read into that stuff too much, I don't see the value in debating whether or not to do 4 sets of 8 or 4 sets of 10, ya know? As long as you are consistent with it and add weight, I don't think it matters as long as it isn't pure neural work and it isn't endurance work with weenie weights.
 
Jeff, there is nothing wrong with your layout, it's fine. I think the bulk of your training has been perfectly fine over the past couple of months.....you're stronger on all of your lifts in legit rep ranges. A layout is just a way to organize training to foster progress. You're making progress in the gym, you're lifting more on all big lifts in the 4-12 range, all your accessory work is better, the only other piece is bodyweight, and it comes down to what you're doing in the kitchen....and you know this just as well, if not better, than anybody on this board (or any other one)
 
BiggT said:
Jeff, there is nothing wrong with your layout, it's fine. I think the bulk of your training has been perfectly fine over the past couple of months.....you're stronger on all of your lifts in legit rep ranges. A layout is just a way to organize training to foster progress. You're making progress in the gym, you're lifting more on all big lifts in the 4-12 range, all your accessory work is better, the only other piece is bodyweight, and it comes down to what you're doing in the kitchen....and you know this just as well, if not better, than anybody on this board (or any other one)
110% agreed.

You got it man, keep at it.
 
JKurz1 said:
so my layout is good tONE?

biggt said:
so long as you're between 4-12 (staying out of endurance work and keeping the weight significant enough ; ie not doing 35 reps with 45lbs on barbell curls or something) and you're consistent with it and add weight to the bar consistently.

There is the answer.
 
JKurz1 said:
WALKING DBELL LUNGE ACROSS GYM FLOOR X 3
(is there a difference between barbell v. debell?

with the DBs you also work on your grip which isnt a bad thing either - might
help with your Deadlifting
 
BiggT said:
I can't say I disagree with the whole article, I think it more or less says 6-12 reps generally promote hypertrophy, I'd even say from my own experience it is more like 4-12.....just not neural and not endurance. People do read into that stuff too much, I don't see the value in debating whether or not to do 4 sets of 8 or 4 sets of 10, ya know? As long as you are consistent with it and add weight, I don't think it matters as long as it isn't pure neural work and it isn't endurance work with weenie weights.
You already know I agree with you there. :)
 
Give some thought to the fact that the guys working "pure neural" rep-ranges walk on stage at the Olympics weighing 350+ pounds. Even if you strip 100 pounds of fat from them, these are not small people.

Many studies have shown that rep-range is mostly irrelevant unless you are poorly trained. When you are poorly trained, the body finds it difficult to fire a lot of fibres at once for a maximal effort and so there's a need to fatigue the muscle fibres and nerve bundles with higher-rep work. As fibres tire, more bundles are called upon to take the load until the body says 'enough, already'.

As you become better trained and improve neural efficiency or rate-coding, the body is better able to fire your muscle fibres in one mighty effort and lower rep-ranges work well for hypertrophy. I suspect than many on here could grow equally well from 3-4 reps as from 8-10.
 
Top Bottom