Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

People in the US should be implanted with birth control patches

gymnpoppa

New member
until they can be certified as responsible adults, capable of raising a child.

I realize this may be unconstitutional, but something has to be done.

I think if either men or women were given BC patches at or before puberty to eliminate bastard kids, or kids by kids, that would save billions of dollars. Since most kids are having unprotected sex at young ages, and parents aren't responsible enough to teach them.

Anybody have an idea?

Sensible, debatable that is. :D
 
no :(

teenage pregnancy is one of the saddest things i see. why they so it is beyond me. but then their children are more likely to become single mums themselves. :( it can ruin a life.....why do these teenage girls think they are 'mature' enough to hav sex, but are so immature as to let themselves get manipulated by elder men into doing it unprotected. of my last school, at the age of 15, 2 girls were pregnant :o

way to prevent it.....bring the age of consent up, or introduce a manditory minimum for bringing a baby into the world. and crack down hard on BOTH genders if the violate it


just an idea. never see it happening.
 
I agree with the concept of having a license before you can have children. Just take a look at those people on welfare with 4-5 kids. They cant even afford one......:mad:
 
THIS POST IS RIDICULOUS!!! C'MON---A LISCENSE TO HAVE KIDS!!! IS THIS A DEMOCRATIC, OR A COMMUNIST STATE!!!

WHY DONT YALL LOOK INTO COUNTRIES IN AFRICA OR SOME SHIT BEFORE TALKING ABOUT THE U.S. IN THOSE COUNTRIES, THERE ARE MORE KIDS RUNNING AROUND WITH NO FATHER ITS PATHETIC. AND SHOULD WE BRING UP THE AIDS PROBLEM OR NOT!!! IT IS A MYTH THAT IF A MAN WHO HAS AIDS HAS SEX WITH A VIRGIN, HE WILL BE CURED OF HIS AILMENT. LOTS AND LOTS OF 10 YEAR OLDS GETTING RAPED BY FUCKING MONSTERS WITH AIDS!!!

ATLEAST THE BABIES IN THE U.S. ARE GETTING TAKEN CARE OF. REGARDLESS IF ITS BY A YOUNG MOTHER OR NOT!!!


KAYNE
 
THE MOTHERS ON WELFARE WHO CANT AFFORD KIDS BUT STILL HAVE THEM, SHOULD BE TAKEN OFF OF WELFARE!!!

MATTER OF FACT, IF YOU ARE ON WELFARE FOR OVER A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME, YOU SHOULD BE TAKEN OFF!!!


KAYNE
 
KAYNE said:
THIS POST IS RIDICULOUS!!! C'MON---A LISCENSE TO HAVE KIDS!!! IS THIS A DEMOCRATIC, OR A COMMUNIST STATE!!!

KAYNE

In a perfect world, it should not be necessary, but there're so many dumb persons that it could be an idea. We are not talking about Africa, we dont give a fuck about them. This thread is a bout civilized countries....
 
I agree with gym. having children is a responsibility, not a priveldge. I'd like to check out all the people in prison, I bet there's a realtionship between a fucked up home life and going to prison.
 
i agree completely with gym... too many fuck ups bringing other fuck ups into this world for the rest of to support.
 
I do think that there should be some kind of population control. If people would use thier mind, not go around reproducing like rabbits, we wouldn't have to worry about population. But you've got people that will go have 5 children with 5 different people, who just don't care. Want an example? Turn on a daytime talk show ala Jenny Jones :D
 
gymnpoppa said:
until they can be certified as responsible adults, capable of raising a child.

I realize this may be unconstitutional, but something has to be done.

I think if either men or women were given BC patches at or before puberty to eliminate bastard kids, or kids by kids, that would save billions of dollars. Since most kids are having unprotected sex at young ages, and parents aren't responsible enough to teach them.

Anybody have an idea?

Sensible, debatable that is. :D

holy fuck i thought the same thing long ago. It really should be mandatory.
 
I don't agree, mainly because my age and income would have most likely prevented me from having my daughter, who is my life.
 
manny78 said:
I agree with the concept of having a license before you can have children.

If you feel that way, perhaps you should move to China. They have that regulation there.

I hear you - there are a lot of sad situations with young single Moms and it affects the economy, etc.

Most of the time, Mom's life is figuratively over, which is OK - that is the consequence of her action. Saddest is the child born at a disadvantage.

There isn;t anything a free society can do. Start by promising yourself that you'll be responsibler about it, and try to share your views with others.

People are generally dumb. get used to it.
 
spentagn said:
I don't agree, mainly because my age and income would have most likely prevented me from having my daughter, who is my life.

I would think mental capacity should have more weight than income and age.
 
manny78 said:
I agree with the concept of having a license before you can have children.

If you feel that way, perhaps you should move to China. They have that regulation there.

I hear you - there are a lot of sad situations with young single Moms and it affects the economy, etc.

Most of the time, Mom's life is figuratively over, which is OK - that is the consequence of her action. Saddest is the child born at a disadvantage.

There isn;t anything a free society can do. Start by promising yourself that you'll be responsibler about it, and try to share your views with others.

People are generally dumb. get used to it.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


If you feel that way, perhaps you should move to China. They have that regulation there.

I hear you - there are a lot of sad situations with young single Moms and it affects the economy, etc.

Most of the time, Mom's life is figuratively over, which is OK - that is the consequence of her action. Saddest is the child born at a disadvantage.

There isn;t anything a free society can do. Start by promising yourself that you'll be responsibler about it, and try to share your views with others.

People are generally dumb. get used to it.


MATT
THATS THE POINT I WAS TRYING TO MAKE. BUT ITS LIKE TALKING TO BRICKS!!! MOST OF THE PEOPLE ON THIS THREAD SOUND LIKE COMMUNISTS.


KAYNE
 
We could keep the females on one side of the nation, and males on the other side, then when the appropriate tests have been done, they will have a couple of days to meet ........

oh wait never mind, this wouldn't work......

The male side of the nation would die off without the females to take care of them.....

well, I thought it might work


j/k
 
you know why this sux..why the gov and essentially tax dollars have to pay for these "pregnancies"..look at it this way..if you went to the gym and out of every 10 sets you did..you only received the benefits from 6 sets(or less)and the other 4 sets went to the "commonwealth"..how many sets would you do?..would you workout as intensely?...would you hammer out another set of 6 intense reps for someone else?..weightlifitng is the finest form of capitalism..nobody can tax my workouts..why tax my work?..I'm a business owner and I cant begin to tell you about the laziness and reliance on the govt safety net that many people in this country harbor...
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


If you feel that way, perhaps you should move to China. They have that regulation there.

I hear you - there are a lot of sad situations with young single Moms and it affects the economy, etc.

Most of the time, Mom's life is figuratively over, which is OK - that is the consequence of her action. Saddest is the child born at a disadvantage.

There isn;t anything a free society can do. Start by promising yourself that you'll be responsibler about it, and try to share your views with others.

People are generally dumb. get used to it.

First of all, I'm not Communist, or think like one, I'm talking about addressing a serious problem. Seeing as how our government doesn't think enough of teachers to pay them well, who's going to change the direction of the youths growing up?
Immature, irresponsible parents aren't. I'm against more government intrusion in lives as far as civil liberties go, but they could eliminate some of the other unecessary things they do, and focus on eliminating the welfare system, both corporate, and poor.

People are lazy, because they aren't required to do anything, in school, or the government has made it to easy for them elsewhere......thru lawsuits, etc. If you're brought up to work hard, respect others, and be responsible, you're most likely going to have those qualities. However, if you know that the system has ridiculous loopholes to take advantage of, you've grown up watching it done, so you continue pushing just to see how LAZY, SORRY, IMMORAL, you can become and exist.

This society has no work ethic, and most people are motivated by greed.
 
Top Bottom