Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below I read on ostarine's clincal trials that at 3mg, 8 out of 52 people experienced "Malignant neoplasm progression." Now does this mean that the drug can cause cancer or activate it if you are predisposed to it? Or that the cancer patients in the study are just getting worse cancer even taking the drug. Currently on osta, a little freaked out. Only thing I have noticed is a lightheadedness every now and then.
Ostarine, Malignant neoplasm progression
- Thread starter peaks123
- Start date
I have literally never heard of this. Please post the link to this study
I read that report, did you also see that those given a placebo had slightly higher statistics for contracting neoplasma? Those reports cannot justify anything if the results for placebo and non-placebo are evenly matched. Leaving ostarine aside, i have 80% chance of dying of coronary heart disease simply because it's hereditary and my DNA genetic makeup had assessed it to be 30% above the average (normally people of my ethnic background have a 50% chance). Hands down even if GW is cancer prone, i will use it simply because it is a tool that will save me from having a heart attack. My rate of catching cancer is very low, the highest is skin cancer which is averaging at 16%, the next is lung cancer which is 10%, all these figures are way under the average compared to most people alive. I also have arthritis from old MMA injuries. So hands down i will take ostarine and gw. Why? Because they are of use to me, and the benefits they provide outweigh the negatives. The question is, is it the same for you?
STTM
Banned
The study was done to see the muscle wasting effects Osta had on people with cancer.
The people already had cancer, so you can't really say that it causes cancer.
If you look at the group of people that were given 3mg of Osta, you will see that 7 out of 52 experienced "malignant neoplasm progression". Now that can be pretty alarming, and could indicate it could in fact cause cancer to progress. But now you have to take the rest of the study, and see how it relates.
It shows that 8 out of 52 people that were on a placebo, also experienced "malignant neoplasm progression". Those numbers are very similar to the ones with the people who were on Osta.
So if you take all of that into consideration, I would say that the "malignant neoplasm progression" was a result of the natural progression of the cancer, and has really nothing to do with Osta. Osta just happened to be used, so it is a victim of association.
The people already had cancer, so you can't really say that it causes cancer.
If you look at the group of people that were given 3mg of Osta, you will see that 7 out of 52 experienced "malignant neoplasm progression". Now that can be pretty alarming, and could indicate it could in fact cause cancer to progress. But now you have to take the rest of the study, and see how it relates.
It shows that 8 out of 52 people that were on a placebo, also experienced "malignant neoplasm progression". Those numbers are very similar to the ones with the people who were on Osta.
So if you take all of that into consideration, I would say that the "malignant neoplasm progression" was a result of the natural progression of the cancer, and has really nothing to do with Osta. Osta just happened to be used, so it is a victim of association.
Similar threads
