Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

OK Conservative Buttholes -- Whaddya think of Kerry's speech?

timwillt73 said:
"Gore received lower grades in his sophomore year at Harvard University than any semester recorded on Bush's transcript from Yale, and Gore earned no degrees higher than a Bachelor of Arts in Government, while Bush earned a Master's degree in Business Administration from Harvard."

from google

What a spine job. LOL!!

bushs_yale_transcript.htm


C student at best.
 
Thank you Australia for being a real friend to the U.S.. It will not be forgotten.

There are no neutral countries anymore. You help fight the Islamofascists or you hinder our efforts by obstruction or inaction.
 
Lots of Bad Salutes
Talked more about Vietnam than Iraq
I swear he looks like he is doing a Hiel Hitler thing with his arm sometimes
No substance such as details on actual things he will do for us
Way too much hugging on dudes even for me.
 
Coverguy said:
Iran - poor, underdeveloped and undereducated where power was taken through money and threat of power.

Germany '33 - country torn apart by loss of first world war with a very poor economy and a country demoralized by the restraints put on them by the peace accords after the a fore mentioned war. charismatic (possibly one of the best orators in the history of the world) leader rises claiming national pride and the dream that all can turn their live/country around.

According to Kerry's speech, and Edwards' too, America is divided, and can get better. They an "restore us". Are they the next Hitler? of course not. But those who say "it can;t happen here" are not in tune with history.

this is how dictators arise. whatever course of action the President has embarked on since 9/11/01 is what it is. unfortunately there is no way to know what Bush's first term would have looked like had this not been the case. one thing we do know, however, is that since this terrible event there haven't been any successful acts of terrorism towards Americans on our soil.

i support Bush fully. I think the iraq war is strategically wise and at home he has done pretty well without rampant abuse of liberties. He;s got my vote. Not sure what your point is.

Matt, I wonder where you live and how you were effected by the acts of terrorism experienced that day? Were you running for your life, or were you like the lady on CNN from South Dakota talking about being afraid, but really not having any clue what that meant. My guess is the second.

Today I have three residences: 2 in FL, one in NY. Primary residence is Jacksonville FL, with a vacation place in W. Palm Beach and an apartment in Brooklyn NY that I use when I am there. My entire family is from NYC.

On 9-11-01, I lived on Long Island, NY. My dad worked in lower Manhattan and my brother in midtown. I had recently left an IT job in the wall street area so I knew dozens of people, friends and family, who quite literally "ran for their lives".

On top of that, my high school was featured in Time magazine for the sheer number of alumni and student-parents who were killed. If you want me to PM you the school so you can look it up, I will.

So, what as your guess again? :)

Lastly, I am a former US Army infantry officer (25th ID and 75th RGR RGT), so I knew more than a handful of people who went off to Iraq.

yes, there is more to the world than the United States, but ... but, when American lives are at stake we must do what is neccessary to insure the safety and strength of our country other countries be damned. if you don't believe this, feel free to renounce your citizenship (if you are American) and move.

ultimately, most nations (and history proves this, so feel free to read a history book!) respond the exact same way and put their country first.

I agree with you 100%. I suspect you misread my original post since I tend to agree with you throughout your post, and have on other posts.
 
[/QUOTE]I agree with you 100%. I suspect you misread my original post since I tend to agree with you throughout your post, and have on other posts.[/QUOTE]



I most definitely did! I agree with your points completely. My bust. Know how you feel. Worked on Wall St. when the event happened and then got sent by the Marine Corps to Kuwait and Iraq in Jan. 03.

Interesting articles for you:

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/lipscomb.html

(links to others on this site.) I'm not Jewish, but was turned on to this guy from a friend of mine. The gentleman who writes these for this site always presents very poignant points!
 
timwillt73 said:
Thank you Australia for being a real friend to the U.S.. It will not be forgotten.

There are no neutral countries anymore. You help fight the Islamofascists or you hinder our efforts by obstruction or inaction.

Please explain what this has to do with Iraq. There were no elements of Al-Qaida in Iraq at the time of invasion. There was and is no evidence to support any Iraq - Al-Qaida ties other than a tenuous meeting that took place in 1994. The war on terror which is the stated mantra of this administration had nothing to do with Iraq and yet you sent 150000 troops there as opposed to 20000 to Afghanistan where the actual people that killed your civilians were holed up. Think that had anything to do with the fact that Osama is still at large?

Please do not compare what is happening in Iraq with Islamic fundamentalists that attacked America, there is absolutely no correlation.
 
I most definitely did! I agree with your points completely. My bust. Know how you feel. Worked on Wall St. when the event happened and then got sent by the Marine Corps to Kuwait and Iraq in Jan. 03.

Interesting articles for you:

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/lipscomb.html

(links to others on this site.) I'm not Jewish, but was turned on to this guy from a friend of mine. The gentleman who writes these for this site always presents very poignant points!

Thanks for the links bro. I'll check them out.
 
bluepeter said:
Please explain what this has to do with Iraq. There were no elements of Al-Qaida in Iraq at the time of invasion. There was and is no evidence to support any Iraq - Al-Qaida ties other than a tenuous meeting that took place in 1994. The war on terror which is the stated mantra of this administration had nothing to do with Iraq and yet you sent 150000 troops there as opposed to 20000 to Afghanistan where the actual people that killed your civilians were holed up. Think that had anything to do with the fact that Osama is still at large?

Please do not compare what is happening in Iraq with Islamic fundamentalists that attacked America, there is absolutely no correlation.


I'm surprised by your close mindedness. You even say yourself - War on Terror(ism). Is Al-Qaida the only terrorist operation in the world? Saddam's links to suicide bombers as well as Hezzbolah is absolute and not questioned by anyone. Neither is the fact that he placed a bounty on our former President's head while he was in office. If these don't constitue terror(ism) in your mind, than i think you need to check out www.websters.com.

Also, there is a little difference between Afghanistan and Iraq. If Afghanistan/Taliban had an army the size of Iraq's (or the armaments for that matter) we would have sent a larger number there first. Fortunately for us, 1 member of our military is trained/supplied well enough to equal out to more than 10 of our enemy.
 
Coverguy said:
I'm surprised by your close mindedness. You even say yourself - War on Terror(ism). Is Al-Qaida the only terrorist operation in the world? Saddam's links to suicide bombers as well as Hezzbolah is absolute and not questioned by anyone. Neither is the fact that he placed a bounty on our former President's head while he was in office. If these don't constitue terror(ism) in your mind, than i think you need to check out www.websters.com.

Also, there is a little difference between Afghanistan and Iraq. If Afghanistan/Taliban had an army the size of Iraq's (or the armaments for that matter) we would have sent a larger number there first. Fortunately for us, 1 member of our military is trained/supplied well enough to equal out to more than 10 of our enemy.

I'm closeminded? I love people who throw out Saddam's Hezbollah links. Hezbollah attacked the United States when? That's right, never. In fact, they have stated many times that they will not attack US interests.

In other words, you are trying to justify this invasion by saying that Saddam had links to Hezbollah, Hezbollah is attacking Israel, Israel are best buddies with the US so the US goes after Saddam.........lol

That's excellent justification for what will end up being 1000's of American deaths. Well, if you don't like that one, there's always the revenge for the bounty on Daddy's head :rolleyes:
 
Top Bottom