bran987
New member
He may refer to the "profits to earnings ratio" of stocks again...something that doesnt exist.
Its "price," you dick.
lol, no way, did he really say that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He may refer to the "profits to earnings ratio" of stocks again...something that doesnt exist.
Its "price," you dick.
I don't believe tax cuts had much to do with it either. I think you could blame a lot of other poliicies though.I'm still trying to figure out how the Bush tax cuts caused the financial services crisis. I hear Dems blame Bush economic policies for the current economic crisis but I don't see it. Sure, his deficit spending probably helped weaken the dollar but oil prices had more of an impact.
Well then...clinton is largely responsible for what is happening today but everyone wants to slam bush...he got rid of a lot of the preventions that were put in place during the great depression such as the glass-steagall act...The repeal enabled commercial lenders such as Citigroup, which was in 1999 then the largest U.S. bank by assets, to underwrite and trade instruments such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations and establish so-called structured investment vehicles, or SIVs, that bought those securities...obama is on the path to fucking up majorly...he will be this generations Jimmmy Carter
The bill that ultimately repealed the Act was introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (Republican of Texas) and in the House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa) in 1999. The bills were passed by Republican majorities on party lines by a 54-44 vote in the Senate[12] and by a 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives[13]. After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. The final bipartisan bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8 (1 not voting) and in the House: 362-57 (15 not voting). Having majorities large enough to override any possible Presidential veto, the legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999. [14]
Does he realize gyration assumes an upward movement, the market has lost 33% since he came into office...talk about talking bullshit. WTF, someone save us PLEASE!!!
Perhaps and it takes a country more than 100 days to come out of a downturn / recession.
Signs of change will be seen probably q4 of 09 but the impact and damage will still be seen in 2010 and perhaps longer. We are in a new scene of the world where customer service and true uniqueness will rule.
If companies don't start changing their approach unemployment will continue for a long time to come.
I told everyone we had a bigger idiot moving in than the one going out. America got change and they deserve it!
My bad, I was referring to his plans...or lack thereof...for the financial sector, which is arguably the one thing holding this market back from beginning a new bull transition.
Remember, the average bear market lasts 14 months and erases 36.2% of the market. Were due for a turnaround.
Sorry, I know its semantics. Im just pissed that futures are lower. Again.
Or he can simply look at Japan and do the exact opposite of what they did.
I guess he doesnt really know that much about Japans Lost Decade considering he is following their playbook step-by-step.