Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

New Product im thinkin about trying..its a strong ass PH

WannaBPowerful

New member
Its by Protogenex. Its called ProTest Fusion. Its a combination of 1_Test and 4-AD. 500 mg delivered of each, per serving. It is said to possibly give u a POSITIVE READING ON STEROID TESTS!!! 95% absorption rate too. If you want more info, read on. If you have tried it, please give me as much feedback as pissible ex. results (weight increase, muscle size), side effects, and how much u kept and how u recovered after the cycle. THANX
 
Looks like good stuff. Lots of mg's/serving. Much much more cost effevtive than Mag-10. I'm going to give it a try...will post my results when after I'm finished.
 
How in the hell do you know if it is more cost effective than MAG-10 if you have never tried it? Just wandering?:confused:
 
Here we go, I'm back on the boards for a day and there is already someone wanting to argue. BTW, though my handle says I'm a novice, I am an old vet; been on these boards since before they even required user registration (since the mid 90's).
As for cost effectiveness, just use a little deductive reasoning...ahh the power of reasoning. Mag 10 has 300mg/dose of active ingredient (the same ingredients as in Test Infusion). The Test Infusion however, has 500mg of EACH ingredient, or a total of 1 gram of active ingredient/serving. There are 24 servings/bottle of Test Infusion for a proce of $64; there are only 14 doses of Mag-10/bottle at a cost of `$60-$80.
I have used Mag-10 and I do not mean to downplay its effectiveness. The stuff works quite well. The problem is that I needed two doses/day and Biotest products don't come cheap.
 
You missed my point. The protogenix product will probably need to be dosed twice daily like the label says for the product to be effective. This brings it down to 12 servings a bottle. MAG-10 is esterified meaning the small percentage of the product that is absorbed will reamain in the body for a much longer period of time than a free prohormone/steroid would. Or at least this is according to Bill Roberts. While I have not tried MAG-10 I have read and heard nothing but good things about it. Many people I have talked to had good/great results from just one dosing a day so this would seem to support Mr. Robert's theory. I see no mention of the Protogenix product being esterified or dissolved in an ether. It is nanoencapsulated, whatever the hell that means, (if someone could explain this to me I would appreciate it) so it seems you would be getting 500mgs. of free prohormone. While I can't say for certain how effective this product will be given that I haven't tried it I bet you would need to dose twice daily to keep steady levels of the hormone in the bloodstream. Even at one and a half doses a day this would be 18 days. Hardly a major improvement on MAG-10. But I digress to your higher level of reasoning you being here since the mid nineties and all. I don't want to get into a pissing match with you about this so I'll end with saying I hope that the product is more effective for you. MAG-10 is a little pricey in my opinion and that so far has been the only reason I have not tried it. It would also be nice to have some user feedback on it as there is none at this point. Good day to you sir.:)
 
Bottle of Mag-10: 4.2 grams active ingredient ($60-$80_
Protogenex: 24 grams of active ingredient ($64)

I am aware of the bioavailability claims made by Biotest as the result of their ethycarbonate ester. You will have a hard time convincing me that Mag-10 has a 6 times better absorbtion rate than the Protogenex product.

24 grams of product for $64 is even cheaper than what you can get at kilosports. If Protogenex can truthfully dissolve a gram of product into each 5ml serving, in all liklihood it is a more cost effective product than Mag-10. All hype aside, this is a completely reasonable assumption to make. Also, while Biotest makes a good product, I have never encountered anyone who has argued that they make highly cost-effective products.
 
Top Bottom