Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Michael Jackson dead? wtf!

If my child were molested, there would be no payoff high enough to get me to not pursue the bastard till he was behind bars. Just the fact that the parents accepted blood money makes me suspicious. Not to mention that his first accuser was recorded saying: "If I go through with this, I win big-time. There's no way I lose. I will get everything I want and they will be destroyed forever...Michael's career will be over." Even the kid's mother insisted he was innocent.

Then consider the psychiatric evaluation done on him during the second trial, where it was said that he had the mental capacity of a "regressed ten year old," and that he did not fit the profile of pedophile. The guy was clearly fucked in the head, which makes it so easy to believe he's a pedo, but the two are not mutually exclusive.

Do I think he's innocent of everything? Don't know. But there's enough there to cast doubt.

if he were as black as mike vick we would have hung from the gallows.


:blow:
 
if he were as black as mike vick we would have hung from the gallows.


:blow:


(shrug) maybe. But what's your point? Since people who think the court system is racist believe that black men are tried unfairly, you're basically saying that if he were blacker, he would have been unfairly convicted.
 
(shrug) maybe. But what's your point? Since people who think the court system is racist believe that black men are tried unfairly, you're basically saying that if he were blacker, he would have been unfairly convicted.

"my point" is my quote.

im "basically saying" what i wrote. thanks but ill write my own point of view.

i just feel like a lot of people would not have blind faith in his excuses if he grew up looking like mommy and daddy jackson.

basically thats my point.
:fro:<--young mike

:stilleto:<----old mike

BO-DEN
 
lol @ him bleaching his skin somehow making him a non-black. he's still a black man. everyone in the world knows it. he's a weirdo for altering his appearance the way he did, that's for certain. the fact that he bleached his skin did not mean he was acquitted for that reason (because his skin was lighter). give it up.
 
Jamie Foxx is all about Mike being a full-on black man:

After the ovation, Foxx told the audience that the show would be festive. "No need to be sad," he told the audience. "We want to celebrate this black man. He belongs to us and we shared him with everyone else." Foxx kept it light, poking fun at Jackson's nose and the change in his skin tone over the years. "Michael was all kinds of black. He was Wesley Snipes and Chico DeBarge at the same time."
 
lol @ him bleaching his skin somehow making him a non-black. he's still a black man. everyone in the world knows it. he's a weirdo for altering his appearance the way he did, that's for certain. the fact that he bleached his skin did not mean he was acquitted for that reason (because his skin was lighter). give it up.



im saying if he was darker.. he would have been hunted and it would have been harder to paint himslef as the victim instead of the child molestor, and maybe alot of you wouldnt defend him

dont get me wrong i like his music but its no excuse for 20 years of being accused.
 
im saying if he was darker.. he would have been hunted and it would have been harder to paint himslef as the victim instead of the child molestor, and maybe alot of you wouldnt defend him

dont get me wrong i like his music but its no excuse for 20 years of being accused.

right. and what i am sayin is that is an absurd thought. at least from my perspective (im white) he is no less black because he decided to lighten his skin tone. honestly white people dont look at someone as more or less black. its just black. i know within your own race however, skin tone plays a big part in whether you are accepted by your people or not. i never understood it but thats neither here nor there.
 
"my point" is my quote.

im "basically saying" what i wrote. thanks but ill write my own point of view.

i just feel like a lot of people would not have blind faith in his excuses if he grew up looking like mommy and daddy jackson.

basically thats my point.
:fro:<--young mike

:stilleto:<----old mike

BO-DEN

Who's got blind faith? My post had nothing to do with anything he's said. I'm willing to bet I have a much more thorough knowledge of the cases than a lot of people who think he's guilty. Including you.
 
you know i love you sexysmurf. but if you could look me in the eye and say you see an african american after seeing a picture of mj with his kids.

he got you with the same micky mouse, pide piper magic.
 
thats cause you love michael jackson.


lol, actually no...Never a big fan of his music. I mean, I liked some of it, but when he was the big thing, I was fantasizing about marrying one of the new kids on the block. Say what you will about my lack of taste in music, haha, but I'm not biased.

I just like to actually have all the facts before I form an opinion.
 
you know i love you sexysmurf. but if you could look me in the eye and say you see an african american after seeing a picture of mj with his kids.

he got you with the same micky mouse, pide piper magic.

lol dude, Michael Jackson is black. whether he likes it or not.
 
nef im just fucking with you cause you chopped my thread. i dont care, makes no differance now hes dead. but no amount of great music makes me ok with crimes againt children.

r-kelly is guilty of the same.
 
Actually, on second thought...I do get a bias in the high profile sex crime cases...but it's almost always toward the victim, not the accused. I recognize that I have that bias, which prompts me to look further into the case than others might, in attempt to get a more balanced opinion.
 
nef im just fucking with you cause you chopped my thread. i dont care, makes no differance now hes dead. but no amount of great music makes me ok with crimes againt children.

r-kelly is guilty of the same.

lol, I figured.

But cmon...the number of MJ threads here are getting out of control lol

And no amount of good music makes me ok with it either. I just don't believe he's guilty.

I do, however, think r kelly is a scumbag.
 
lol dude, Michael Jackson is black. whether he likes it or not.

i dont know. his children are not black ... im mixed alll my brothers and sisters are all differant variations of being mixed

his son dont look like me or barrack obamma
 
i dont know. his children are not black ... im mixed alll my brothers and sisters are all differant variations of being mixed

his son dont look like me or barrack obamma

i dont think his kids are even biologically his IMO. i think his ex-whatever that Debbie Rowe carried those kids and used a sperm donor (not Michaels sperm).
 
i dont know. his children are not black ... im mixed alll my brothers and sisters are all differant variations of being mixed

his son dont look like me or barrack obamma

debbie rowe, their mother, just spilled today that she used an annonymous sperm donor. Biologically, they are not his kids.
 
Actually, on second thought...I do get a bias in the high profile sex crime cases...but it's almost always toward the victim, not the accused. I recognize that I have that bias, which prompts me to look further into the case than others might, in attempt to get a more balanced opinion.

money makes you right court nef.

good lawyer vs. great lawyer who wins?

that is the only fact i take with me to court. bring your checkbook
 
I do, however, think r kelly is a scumbag.

nef this is my entire point.

court is ruled by $$$ so ofcorse mj wins. and so willl r-kelly.

if michael was r-kelly or mike vick he would = scumbag. for you

but i just want to ask you whats really the differance?

america has turned mj into some kind of god that could do no wrong.


r-kelly will win his case after watching a video in court of him peeing on a minor.

but america will hate him why is it differant?
 
nef this is my entire point.

court is ruled by $$$ so ofcorse mj wins. and so willl r-kelly.

if michael was r-kelly or mike vick he would = scumbag. for you

but i just want to ask you whats really the differance?

america has turned mj into some kind of god that could do no wrong.


r-kelly will win his case after watching a video in court of him peeing on a minor.

but america will hate him why is it differant?

I'm not so sure he'll win his case. There is actual hard evidence that kelly is guilty, where there was absolutely nothing that concrete with MJ. And the public opinion is based on the same thing. The two cases are entirely different as far as the amount of evicence.

And money certainly helps you get a good lawyer...I won't deny that it is a benefit. But facts are facts, and there is plenty with MJ to cast doubt of his guilt. I've already listed a few of them.
 
And the public opinion is based on the same thing.

and the fact he publicly stated that he did not see a problem with a 45 year old man sharing his bed with little boys :worried:

like I said before, the only thing I want with a 12 y.o. boy is to possibly bang his mom
 
Top Bottom