Even though this thread may belong in the supplement board, I'd like to give it a bump. We only have a limited time before these two drugs are eliminated (unless UG labs start producing them, which I really doubt). There won't be much to say about them that hasn't been said before, but unique ideas are still interesting to hear.
They compare methyl-D to methyl-trenbolone because of the similar structure. I've heard though that the results aren't always too amazing, but I bet it's just because the stuff is underdosed. I have not tried the stuff, so I wouldn't know. Maybe the "methyl-tren similarity" is just an excuse for supp companies to sell the stuff in small doses and higher price?