Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

London cops need some firearms training.

jestros

Banned
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/22/london.eyewitness/index.html

Whitby said a young Asian man was shot five times after being chased into a train carriage by three men.

"As the man got on the train I looked at his face. He looked from left to right, but he basically looked like a cornered rabbit, like a cornered fox. He looked absolutely petrified," said Whitby.

"He sort of tripped but they were hotly pursuing him and couldn't have been more than two or three feet behind him at this time.

"He half-tripped, was half-pushed to the floor. The policeman nearest to me had the black automatic pistol in his left hand, he held it down to the guy and unloaded five shots into him."


So my point is, if he is a terrorist, wouldn't you like to get one alive, and you know, question him or something?

And if he was innocent, your gonna piss off some minorities, and increase the amount of people that will inflict violence on the general population.
 
it mentions that he was wearing a padded jacket that looked out of place, maybe they thought he was hiding something, armed or ready to detonate.....i don't know

it's good to read that the MET are hunting down these scum
 
jestros said:
I believe one part of firearms training is when to shoot, and when not to shoot

I always thought the British police didn't use guns. Maybe this is a new experiment.

It would be good to catch the bastard while alive so he could be tortured until he rats out his whole group.
 
5 shots at close range, with the guy already on the floor... it would have been a good chance to get one alive... then again, who knows what goes in your mind at that point
 
pintoca said:
.. with the guy already on the floor... it would have been a good chance to get one alive...

..or to get yourself blown up if you don't act REAL fast and he's wired up.
 
i applaud them


like i did the russians when they gassed those terrorists and executed them all while they were passed out....i don't think there's much margin for fucking around when it comes to these matters
 
jerkbox said:
i applaud them


like i did the russians when they gassed those terrorists and executed them all while they were passed out....i don't think there's much margin for fucking around when it comes to these matters
Yeah, that was great when they gassed the terrorists and killed half the hostages. Way to go Ruskies.

Killing one terrorist isnt going to help in the big picture, you need to be able to get them alive. The cop fucked up.
 
Seashell said:
..or to get yourself blown up if you don't act REAL fast and he's wired up.
I totally agree with you. Who knows if he was wired or not? They knew he had involvement in the bombings yesterday and he was a threat. It's not worth taking a chance of getting him alive when the chances of him being strapped are high. Innocent lives were at stake at that very moment.
I salute the men that killed that dirty fuck!!!! :Chef: :tuc:
 
Seashell said:
..or to get yourself blown up if you don't act REAL fast and he's wired up.

of course what if the guy had something rigged so that if he died and released a switch it would go off anyways? (which would be the smart way to have it rigged)
 
Becoming said:
of course what if the guy had something rigged so that if he died and released a switch it would go off anyways? (which would be the smart way to have it rigged)

I was thinking that depending on the explosives (not with highly stable plastic ones though) you could actually run a risk of detonating the guy by firing like that at him???
 
pintoca said:
I was thinking that depending on the explosives (not with highly stable plastic ones though) you could actually run a risk of detonating the guy by firing like that at him???

probably. I don't know much about explosives... but yeah. that too.
 
jestros said:
Yeah, that was great when they gassed the terrorists and killed half the hostages. Way to go Ruskies.

Killing one terrorist isnt going to help in the big picture, you need to be able to get them alive. The cop fucked up.

Not necessarily. Picking them off one by one is a good policy. Why hold them in a cell to gather information, of which they may have none?
We gather up a bunch of terrorists and hold them which pisses off the ones who are free, giving them cause to say take their own hostages, put them in an orange jumpsuit and cut off their heads.
If there ever was a time for a shoot first policy when dealing with these people, this is it.
 
It's a cops job to risk his life. I know they'll spin it for the press, but I guarentee he's getting his ass chewed out by his boss.
 
pintoca said:
I was thinking that depending on the explosives (not with highly stable plastic ones though) you could actually run a risk of detonating the guy by firing like that at him???

I believe you're supposed to shoot for the head in those cases.. but I don't think we know for sure where the bullets hit the person. At any rate, it's one of those tough decisions one has to make without all the info and very little time..
 
Seashell said:
I believe you're supposed to shoot for the head in those cases.. but I don't think we know for sure where the bullets hit the person. At any rate, it's one of those tough decisions one has to make without all the info and very little time..

5 close-range to the head will definitely leave a headless body, not to mention that each shot will me much harder to make than the previous one
 
pintoca said:
5 close-range to the head will definitely leave a headless body, not to mention that each shot will me much harder to make than the previous one

Ah. Good to know.
 
jestros said:
It's a cops job to risk his life. I know they'll spin it for the press, but I guarentee he's getting his ass chewed out by his boss.

A cop's job is to protect the public and enforce the law.

I don't think anyone will be terribly upset that he didn't hesitate to shoot.
 
Well, the terrorist didn't kill anyone so I guess it's all good. It just might have been better to have been able to question him (or maybe not)
 
Some cops in England have guns. They're special response units I believe. In this case, what if the guy had explosives ? If he was innocent then how come he didnt stop and ranaway ?
 
jestros said:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/22/london.eyewitness/index.html

Whitby said a young Asian man was shot five times after being chased into a train carriage by three men.

"As the man got on the train I looked at his face. He looked from left to right, but he basically looked like a cornered rabbit, like a cornered fox. He looked absolutely petrified," said Whitby.

"He sort of tripped but they were hotly pursuing him and couldn't have been more than two or three feet behind him at this time.

"He half-tripped, was half-pushed to the floor. The policeman nearest to me had the black automatic pistol in his left hand, he held it down to the guy and unloaded five shots into him."


So my point is, if he is a terrorist, wouldn't you like to get one alive, and you know, question him or something?

And if he was innocent, your gonna piss off some minorities, and increase the amount of people that will inflict violence on the general population.


At this point, no more terrorists are necessary alive. The best thing we can do, is kill 'em all.

If he was innocent, I'm really sorry but all the terrorists have the same background. Arab muslims. If the rest of Arab muslims think they are good, well, turn against these dudes and show us your unconditional support. Be smart. If you are neutral or show some disagreement, you are not playing fair.
 
Top Bottom