Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Lets talk EQ

gatemoney

Banned
Not a proposed cycle, just for discussion.
My 2nd cycle was eq only @400mg ew for 10 weeks and had amazing results!
Bf was about 8-9% and i got vascularity across abs, thighs and striation on delts and obliques. Very little muscle gain.
( Would never do this again,mood and libido were shit)
So here I am a few years down the road a lot smarter than I was then thanks to ef!
Now all i see is ppl suggesting that eq be run for a min of 16 weeks even 20+weeks to reap the full benefits.
Witch really raises my eyebrow cuz if i had great results with 10weeks 16 or more, plus a standard test dose would be phenomenal.
So now were talking a 4 month+ cycle at the least.
With a cycle that long wouldn't the hpta be at risk of permanent damage?
EQ and test are relatively cheap in my experience but the cost of support supps and ancillaries would really start to add up.
Even for someone who responds very well to eq ( like me) is the risk /reward really worth?
Please discuss opinions and personal experiences
 
I think the length of your cycle should depend on two major factors.... How experienced you are with aas, and when you stop gaining, stop using.. That simple. If you listen to your body, you'll know how long to run a cycle.

Sent from my LG-E739 using EliteFitness
 
If you're already lean, eq will give you that vascularity and if your an endurance athlete it's great but that's about all people get from it. I prefer masteron over eq simply because it's benefits are similar and the results come more quickly. I do agree that if you run eq, longer cycles are generally better. I've been in this game a long time and I've never heard anybody until now call the results they got from eq "amazing". Especially at a modest dose and for a relatively short (by eq standards) duration. But everybody does respond differently to different compounds.
 
If you're already lean, eq will give you that vascularity and if your an endurance athlete it's great but that's about all people get from it. I prefer masteron over eq simply because it's benefits are similar and the results come more quickly. I do agree that if you run eq, longer cycles are generally better. I've been in this game a long time and I've never heard anybody until now call the results they got from eq "amazing". Especially at a modest dose and for a relatively short (by eq standards) duration. But everybody does respond differently to different compounds.

Not only have I not ever heard anyone, aside from Gate, call there EQ results amazing but I haven't seen it either. Everyone that I know who uses it, seems to get nothing from it, visually from me, but they all talk like it's awesome. Let's be real. . .Gate, you're the shit so 10 weeks worked well for you:-) I love masteron so much that I will be running it at 100mg ED for 14 weeks during my next cycle.
 
I personally prefer Masteron over EQ! I have never really received much out of EQ however I have a buddy that I lift with and he started EQ at 600 per week last year and has dropped 50 pounds and it has worked wonders for him however he is a very big guy! He is the only person that I know , that has actually made drastic gains off EQ!
 
I'm not down with anxiety, low libido and a general sence of unwell being...
 
I am running a good amount of EQ right now and have been for about 20 weeks now. Amazing? Meh. I am going back to Masteron I believe.
 
test and dhts all the way :)
 
Im running 600mg eq for quite some time. No problems here, just more of a "3d" look with some vascularity. It works much better if you have low bodyfat though.

Better alternative is Primo but its hard to get real primo and its pricey...and can mess with your hair.
 
If you're already lean, eq will give you that vascularity and if your an endurance athlete it's great but that's about all people get from it. I prefer masteron over eq simply because it's benefits are similar and the results come more quickly. I do agree that if you run eq, longer cycles are generally better. I've been in this game a long time and I've never heard anybody until now call the results they got from eq "amazing". Especially at a modest dose and for a relatively short (by eq standards) duration. But everybody does respond differently to different compounds.

The vascularity was nothing short of amazing. I had new veins everyday.
In my research i have found that there is a clear line drawn between those that think this compound is absolutely worthless and those that love it.
Im sure it helped that i was at least sub 6% bf at the end of it. I got so lean my family approached me concerned i was doing something unhealthy.
 
Not only have I not ever heard anyone, aside from Gate, call there EQ results amazing but I haven't seen it either. Everyone that I know who uses it, seems to get nothing from it, visually from me, but they all talk like it's awesome. Let's be real. . .Gate, you're the shit so 10 weeks worked well for you:-) I love masteron so much that I will be running it at 100mg ED for 14 weeks during my next cycle.

I am running mast now and getting positive results.
Im just speaking of my personal experience, not trying to sell anyone something. Like i said i got NO size out of it but cut striated and vascularity are definitely worth mentioning.
 
Top Bottom