Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Kidd for Marbury? WHY?!?!?

PsychoSkitz

New member
This is the stupidest move in the history of the game.

Why trade a great point guard for a very good point guard? You just downgraded the frikking position on the team. Idiots.

I'm done with the Nets. They blow. Is there any vacancy on the Suns bandwagon?

Hell, the only reason I started following those crummy fools was because Marbury. Now this. That's just plain stupid. It's like trading Iverson for Marbury. It just doesn't make any sense.
 
Damn that sucks...the nba is starting to suck now..too many high schoolers..i cant believe my boy Battier went to Vancouver! after busting his ass for FOUR YEARS at DUKE and gettting his DEGREE from DUKE, he gets rewarded by going to the grizzlies..no offense you canadiens on the board but they fuckin suck..i'm pissed..i figured MJ would have enough brains to draft him
 
Actually, let me rephrase that. This is the 2nd stupidest move in league history. The first was when they traded Griffin yesterday.
 
I just want to know where my man Cwebb is gonna land..my boy Jason Williams for Mike Bibby was a good trade for the kings but i hate to see JW in Vancouver
 
Psycho,

You're absolutely nuts if you think Marbury is better than Jason Kidd. Nuts. Marbury gets by partially because of the weakness of the Eastern Conference.

Jason Kidd is the best point guard in the game by far right now. The second best is DUKE'S Jason Williams, (not Sacramento's) and he didn't come out.

The Griffin trade is a tought thing to swallow, but they just drafted Kenyon Martin last year and one of them had to go. I would have kept Griffin, but Marbury....good riddance.
 
yeah JW from Duke is tight..i've never seen a point guard in college yoke on fools in the lane during a game in a half court set..i mean Allen Iverson did back in G town, but fuck, thats A.I.

there seems to be a shortage of nasty point guards in the NBA..its all slashers and wing players...

Kidd, Marbury, Payton are nasty, but the rest suck..
 
Matt,

I cant agree with you. As a rookie in the Western Conference Marbury averaged more PPG than Kidd ever has. He keeps getting better.

The one less assist a game that Marbury averages isn't a big deal either. Marbury has the ability to lead a team the way Iverson leads a team and Kidd doesn't.

The Nets can't afford to throw away 15 PPG. Kidd is very good, I will admit that. However Steph's just a year older than Kobe and is a player who gets better every year. He's more of an asset to this franchise than a guy who will score 13 points and dish out 8 assists per game.

On paper the Nets just traded 24PPG/7APG for 15PPG/9APG. I don't see where that's beneficial, unless they think Martin will be scoring 35 a game for them next year.
 
Kakdiesel said:
i mean Allen Iverson did back in G town, but fuck, thats A.I.


I will get ridiculed for this now but not in 5 years: I would rather have Williams from Duke than Iverson on my team. What Iverson did at Georgetown was impressive, but the Big East then was no ACC. It hasn't been as good as the ACC since the mid 1980s.

Williams is a better shooter than Iverson - he is a pure shooter whereas Iverson is streaky. Iverson has plenty of games where he is not hot and shoots 11-34. A 17-31 every fourth night will occur, but Williams is now (and will be in the NBA) the mark of consistency.


Psycho,

The differential in points can be attributed largely to the weaker conference. I like Kidd because it is clear that he makes the people around him better. I guess time will tell.
 
JW better than AI???

What have you been shooting Deca in your brain. Call me in 5 years so you can pull your foot outta your mouth.
 
dude

look on the bright side, if kidd moves close enough to you, you will get to see him kick the shit out of his wife a couple of times a week.......
 
The Nets have once again broken my heart

24 hours ago I thought they would start Marbury at PG, Martin at SF, Griffin at PF, and trade Mr. Softie(Van Horn) for either a 2-guard or a C. Now who knows what direction they are going in.

Being a Celtics fan as well, what the hell were they thinking yesterday? Who's playing point next year, Walker?
 
True the eastern conference is weaker, but marbury was in the western conference just a couple years ago, and he was scoring more then kidd then, at a much more immature stage. Personally, i dont like Marbury, but i think he is quite impressive. Kidd right now is probably the best POINT guard. Marbury i think might be a better talent and player or asset to a team, especially the nets. He can carry a team down the stretch, which kidd cannot. Kidd is great, but they are two contrasting players. I dont see why the suns traded Kidd by the way. He made their team go. He is why they were worth anything.
 
Kakdiesel said:
Damn that sucks...the nba is starting to suck now..too many high schoolers..i cant believe my boy Battier went to Vancouver! after busting his ass for FOUR YEARS at DUKE and gettting his DEGREE from DUKE, he gets rewarded by going to the grizzlies..no offense you canadiens on the board but they fuckin suck..i'm pissed..i figured MJ would have enough brains to draft him

Great point!!!
Shane Battier= excellent student, Duke grad, player of the year, national champion----doesn't get picked til like 7th!?!?!? After all these high-schoolers? WTF?

I guess it's business, but it's getting offensive.
 
Re: JW better than AI???

DoctorHERB said:
What have you been shooting Deca in your brain. Call me in 5 years so you can pull your foot outta your mouth.

Duke's Jason Williams, not Sacramento's. His fundamentals are already better than Iverson. Once he is cvhallenged by the NBA he will rise toi the top of that just like he has in college. Anyway as I said in my post above, I expect to her shit about it now....in 5 years we'll talk.
 
I'll take Marbury over Kidd, but whats the point, they are one in the same, thats like trading Randy for Pedro.
 
NBA sucks anyway!

If anybody got screwed it was the Suns. Marbury only cares about 1 person and that's himself. Look for the Nets to spreadit around more with Kidd. At least he can dish.:fro:
 
Natymike said:
, they are one in the same, thats like trading Randy for Pedro.


Randy's 38, Pedro's 30. And Randy's big strikeout numbers are bolstered by facing the pitcher 4 or 5 times a game, a luxury Pedro does not have. Yet Pedro maintains a lower ERA.

Pedro is way better than randy.
 
I'm not so sure i would have traded a proven 20 point,10 rebound guy in Elton Brand for an unproven 7 footer coming out of high school in Tyson Chandler.
 
hey thermo: that trade was the best thing bulls have done since jordan left their asses. Elton Brand ain't all that great man. he averaged 20pts/10rebs on a sorryyyyyyyyyyyy ass team. he got the ball every time he wanted it, yet he only managed to score 20ish points a game and grab down 10 boards? he was the only guy who ever took any shots on that team. He's a "good" player, but not someone you can build a team around. and trust me, that tyson chandler guy is gonna tear it up in the NBA. he's got a great built, and he's stilll got a lot of growing up to do, physically and mentally. the people who picked up NO.2 overall aren't dumb man, they probably watched him play every single game. but who knows anyone can be a bust comin out of the draft. but I think bulls made a good move, they cleared some cap room so they can get some experience on that team to lead these young players. now only if they can get rid of that sorry ass mercer. he's a fucking discrase to bulls basketball.
 
Hey kackdeisel...The grizzlies are gonna be ALOT better this year! They just acquired Jason Williams from the kings. And they got alot of young talent, now Battier. Give em a year or two and they will be contenders...trust me!

Matttheskywalker...good point! Pedro Is alot better than Randy! Anyone who says different doesn't know shit about baseball!

And winny fan...I don't know why Forte went 21st, but I'm glad he did. The weird thing is...all they are talking about here in Boston are the other two guys we got. I never even heard of them before the draft!! WTF? In the newspaper the day after the draft, there was a big article about Joe Johnson and that other guy...and just a tiny picture of Forte in the corner! I just don't get it!
B-10
 
All of the guys

with offensive minded thinking are going to suffer with the zone defenses coming back...the college kids will be okay...but the wide open game is going to slow down...Vince C....Stackhouse...etc...are all going to be trying to find some jumpshots......the zones allow nonathletic type shooters to survive....hello Steve Alford.....bunch of big guys camping in the lane playing absolutely no man-to-man defense......hello Shawn Bradley...where is Manute Bol......Kobe......well that ball hog is going to find out what zones are like since he never went to college
:D Ps.....Marbury is a ball hog....just as much as Iverson......and he is selfish too.....Minnesota was a much better team than NJ...but he couldn't coexist with KG......no rings for him in Phoenix either......of course it isn't about the rings for most of these guys now......it never has been......Hats off to Larry Brown...for taking a GenX baller and making him more of a team player.....Phil Jackson admitted he couldn't do it unless he had the superstars already in place when he got there......he just had to be a shrink....:fro:
 
PsychoSkitz said:
This is the stupidest move in the history of the game.

Why trade a great point guard for a very good point guard? You just downgraded the frikking position on the team. Idiots.

I'm done with the Nets. They blow. Is there any vacancy on the Suns bandwagon?

Hell, the only reason I started following those crummy fools was because Marbury. Now this. That's just plain stupid. It's like trading Iverson for Marbury. It just doesn't make any sense.

you still talking??
 
Haha...I guess Rod Thorn saw something I didn't.

What a great trade!

Has anyone heard anything about Kidd staying past this year? Half way through the season he sounded like he wanted to play in a nicer (warmer for the Cali boy) area. If he did leave the only team I wouldn't mind seeing him play for would be Sacramento.
 
lol, yea I defintately didn't see the trade making this big of an impact.

Haven't heard anything about him leaving.

Sacramento? wow, kidd and bibby would be something.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:



Randy's 38, Pedro's 30. And Randy's big strikeout numbers are bolstered by facing the pitcher 4 or 5 times a game, a luxury Pedro does not have. Yet Pedro maintains a lower ERA.

Pedro is way better than randy.

Interesting spin.

Randy does NOT face a pitcher 4 to 5 times a game......at best he will face a pitcher 3 maybeeeee 4 times. Pedro maintains a lower ERA yes but also look at innings pitched.
Let's look at the last three yrs.

'99 Pedro's ERA 2.07 IP = 213
Randy's ERA = 2.48 IP = 271. 58 more innings or 6+ complete games and thats in the NL where pitchers are not as likely to work deeper into the games.
'00 Pedro ERA = 1.74 IP= 217
Randy's ERA = 2.64 IP = 248 Not as big a diff but still it equals 3 games
'01 Pedro's ERA 2.39 IP = 116 He was hurt of course.
Randy's ERA = 2.49 IP = 249.

Interesting stats for you........ How many K's they have in relationship to the batting order in the last three yrs:
#1 = 117
#2 = 120
#3 = 114
#4 = 147
#5 = 109
#6 = 122
#7 = 104
#8 = 104
#9 = 146

Pedro's stats
#1 = 59
#2 = 75
#3 = 83
#4 = 98
#5 = 81
#6 = 93
#7 = 101
#8 = 93
#9 = 77

Conclusion........ I dunno...... 10% of Pedro's K's come from the #9 spot whereas 13% for Randy.
 
Top Bottom