Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Is there a difference?

it helps if your put more info in the subject title. the only way someone will open this thread is out of curiosity.

difference Between IGF-1 R3 and IGF-LR3? now thats a good subject title
 
mr.nitrofish said:
it helps if your put more info in the subject title. the only way someone will open this thread is out of curiosity.

difference Between IGF-1 R3 and IGF-LR3? now thats a good subject title
Actually no. More people will open a thread with a title that tells them little or nothing about the subject.
Just look at the views of threads like....



WTF is wrong with people????
I just saw something no one would believe!
Does anyone know what this is?
Can I use dbol and winny together? (okay this one tells the content but you'll still get 100 views by all the newbies who want the answer but are afraid to ask)

Title: The Police were just here!!!!

Post: Two cops just came to my door asking for donations for their charity.
But anyway, I was wondering if anyone knows if I can put test and deca in the same syringe?? TIA
 
Ulter said:
They are both waste of money.


in your oppinion only, and you can voice yours here.

If i stated everything here i thought was a waste of money i would be banned!!!
 
Ulter said:
They are both waste of money.


Why do you feel that way? I was contemplating throwing some into my next PCT.
 
njmuscleguy said:
Why do you feel that way? I was contemplating throwing some into my next PCT.


you know what they say about oppinions bro.............

IGF is a great addition to a stack and to PCT, i don't give two shits what anyone else here says, and i think more will agree with me than disagree with me on this one
 
I say that because 4 years ago 9 of the moderators on my board tried it and our conclusion was that it was not worth the money. That was Monster, Mr Nobody, Decaman, E2, Ranger, Iron God, GymRatNYC, and some of the most experienced vets on the boards. Now you probably don't know any of those names but trust me they were the Elite of Elite at one time.
 
I didnt get anything from IGF, but i got it from that shit bag PRESSER who runs musclechemisty so im pretty sure it was just junk in a bottle.
 
Ulter said:
I say that because 4 years ago 9 of the moderators on my board tried it and our conclusion was that it was not worth the money. That was Monster, Mr Nobody, Decaman, E2, Ranger, Iron God, GymRatNYC, and some of the most experienced vets on the boards. Now you probably don't know any of those names but trust me they were the Elite of Elite at one time.


Actually i do know remember them, you can drop the snobby tone with me, i've been here as long as you

and I don't remember there being a LR3 version 4 years ago, only the regular IGF-1 which had a half life of a few minutes.(although i could be wrong on this)

There are many vets that use it and like it now Ulter, 4 years ago was 4 years ago but im not going to argue with you on elite, because of course this is your house and i have no choice but to lose
 
I wasn't too impressed with gh, but I hear IGF is better. I've already heard from a few good bros that they're getting good results from it. I want to run it heavy during the few months I'm between cycles. I'm actually looking forward to being off. 15 weeks of tren/eq/proviron is making me very impatient and agitated. It's a struggle sometimes.
 
krishna said:
Between IGF-1 R3 and IGF-LR3? If so, which one is better and why?

LR3 IGF-1
Long Recumbent 3 IGF-1, which is an 83 amino acid analog of human IGF-1 sequence with the substitution of an arg for the glu at position 3 (hence R3), and a 13 amino acid extension peptide at the N-terminus (hence the long).

Also I should let you know that the form of IGF is the Long R3 analog. It has been chemically altered and has a longer half-life than regular IGF
 
swordfish151 said:
LR3 IGF-1
Long Recumbent 3 IGF-1, which is an 83 amino acid analog of human IGF-1 sequence with the substitution of an arg for the glu at position 3 (hence R3), and a 13 amino acid extension peptide at the N-terminus (hence the long).

Also I should let you know that the form of IGF is the Long R3 analog. It has been chemically altered and has a longer half-life than regular IGF


thanks for clearing that up sword!!
 
drrman said:
Actually i do know remember them, you can drop the snobby tone with me, i've been here as long as you

and I don't remember there being a LR3 version 4 years ago, only the regular IGF-1 which had a half life of a few minutes.(although i could be wrong on this)

There are many vets that use it and like it now Ulter, 4 years ago was 4 years ago but im not going to argue with you on elite, because of course this is your house and i have no choice but to lose
WTF is wrong with you? I wasn't being a snob to you. There are LOTS of people who were here 6 years ago and don't know who those people are. Mainly because they spend their time on CC. If you know who they are then great.
This discussion is not win or lose. It's opinions. And you have already told me what good those are (which made it you with the "tone", not me). I was merely pointing out that I was not just giving MY opinion but that of many others who jumped on this bandwagon a long time ago and dismissed it.
 
Ulter said:
WTF is wrong with you? I wasn't being a snob to you. There are LOTS of people who were here 6 years ago and don't know who those people are. Mainly because they spend their time on CC. If you know who they are then great.
This discussion is not win or lose. It's opinions. And you have already told me what good those are (which made it you with the "tone", not me). I was merely pointing out that I was not just giving MY opinion but that of many others who jumped on this bandwagon a long time ago and dismissed it.


a long time ago these guys were not using LR3 IGF either, and your first post in this thread was "its a waste of money"...........................you gave your oppinion then you are giving the supposed oppinions of past vets who haven't even used the LR3 version.

But maybe the "elite of the elite" had access to the LR3 3 years before the rest of us, i dunno
 
Ulter...what brand of igf did you guys test? I just think alot of the mixed reviews come from guys who got legit stuff and some who bought garbage like myself.
 
Top Bottom