Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Is Kerry's speech on Stem Cell research...

curling said:
Funny. Did you notice no one said a word about your post? I guess this how most of the people here think about killing unborn babies to help keep older people that have got to live some of life alive. Not worth even a word. Our society has truly became sick, demented, cold and immoral. Like I said wouldn't make more sense to do stem cell research on welfare receipiants that way we solve two problems that plague society at once.

Nobody is saying that they will murder fetuses for the express purpose of conducting research in this area. Would you be opposed to this research if tissue donation was on a volunteer basis i.e. if a child or anyone dies anyway, is it then OK?

That said, abortion is LEGAL in your country. If a fetus is going to be aborted, you might as well have some good come of that. If you don't like this, move to a country where it isn't legal.
 
bluepeter said:
Nobody is saying that they will murder fetuses for the express purpose of conducting research in this area. Would you be opposed to this research if tissue donation was on a volunteer basis i.e. if a child or anyone dies anyway, is it then OK?

That said, abortion is LEGAL in your country. If a fetus is going to be aborted, you might as well have some good come of that. If you don't like this, move to a country where it isn't legal.

Why not make killing welfare reciepiants legal and then use their bodies for research? They are proven losers(where the unborn babies have not yet got the chance to even prove themselves) and are a real drain on society. But the democrats would never go for this because without people on welfare why the heck would anybody vote democratic?
 
curling said:
Why not make killing welfare reciepiants legal and then use their bodies for research? They are proven losers(where the unborn babies have not yet got the chance to even prove themselves) and are a real drain on society. But the democrats would never go for this because without people on welfare why the heck would anybody vote democratic?

lol, you're hilarious.
 
curling said:
Maybe so. But it makes sense in a way huh?

Not really, that's why I found it amusing :)

You're comparing a situation where LEGALLY a fetus is terminated and some good can come out of it in the form of research to possibly save lives to ILLEGALLY murdering someone for that express purpose.
 
bluepeter said:
Not really, that's why I found it amusing :)

You're comparing a situation where LEGALLY a fetus is terminated and some good can come out of it in the form of research to possibly save lives to ILLEGALLY murdering someone for that express purpose.

Well lets talk about the legality of the issue then. Four dumbasses that somehow got appointed by a dumbass president decided it should be legal to kill babies. Why not have those same dumbasses vote to kill people on welfare?
 
curling said:
Well lets talk about the legality of the issue then. Four dumbasses that somehow got appointed by a dumbass president decided it should be legal to kill babies. Why not have those same dumbasses vote to kill people on welfare?

That's a whole different topic that I tend to ride the fence on :)
 
juicedpigtails said:
current cell lines arent sufficient. come on now. i may be the only other person here that knows what a ''cell line'' is but still. thats crap.

explain to me why they are not
 
Top Bottom