Is EQ a waste for a shorter cycle?

[athlete03]

I've read that it takes EQ a while to get the full effect. Would it be a waste to use it in a six or eight week cycle?

 

[therookie]

Eq takes 4-5 weeks for me to kick in, so yes a 6 wek cycle would be a waste.

400mg/wk/10-12 weeks is a perfect run

 

[solidspine]

Ditto to the above, 10 weeks is the minimum, so try deca instead

 

[Slider]

I agree with running EQ longer than 6wks. I'm in my mid 5wk and just started to totaly see the great things EQ brings.
Also guys in regards to EQ how long after would you wait to cycle EQ again after a 12wk cycle.
Would it still take aprox. 5wks to start to see gains and the great Vascularity it gives you?

Thanks,
Slider

 

[Slider]

Bump,
Any input for Karma?

 

[jc21]

i usually wait a good 10-12 weeks between each time i do eq. i think 8 weeks is ok for eq...but anything 10 and over is better.

 

[techlifter_2]

i wouldn't try deca in a short cycle either. what about primo? 200-400 mg/wk would work great.

 

[G ChildlihC G]

What about Winny, what about Fina, what about Prop? 6 week cycles are better with the faster acting esters, long acting ones like Eq, Deca and the longer tests should be ran longer than 6.