I liked primo a lot. slow and quality gains.. not fast bs water weight gains
I noticed a difference by week 2. only thing I would recommend was going with a long esther test. because with primo you already are gonna be injecting a lot. each ml is 100mg. so using prop with it is gonna be a lot of injecting.
best of all sides were non existant!! did not have any insomnia or high bp etc.
I liked primo a lot. slow and quality gains.. not fast bs water weight gains
I noticed a difference by week 2. only thing I would recommend was going with a long esther test. because with primo you already are gonna be injecting a lot. each ml is 100mg. so using prop with it is gonna be a lot of injecting.
best of all sides were non existant!! did not have any insomnia or high bp etc.
I tolerate Tren well. The few sides I get are worth it to me. Would there be any reason ASIDE from trying to dodge suppression and side effects that would make Primo a better choice? Would including Tren in with a primo cycle just outshine the primo and make it a waste of money?
I know in the past you have suggested 14-16 weeks for primo. You love the stuff, would 10 weeks be enough to shine bright at 400mg/wk with a primo base?
That sounds like a mean one! God I love mast, it was in my original plan, but I have an "opportunity" to run primo that I feel I have to take while the iron is hot so I want to see what all the rage is about
That sounds like a mean one! God I love mast, it was in my original plan, but I have an "opportunity" to run primo that I feel I have to take while the iron is hot so I want to see what all the rage is about