Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

I'm going to be controversial here and ask, your opinion.

columbia58 said:
Your historical facts are in error. Get your facts straight then we will talk civil war. CSA
What part is wrong then? Nah, I'm right on the money and know it...
You better back that up, fella.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
What part is wrong then? Nah, I'm right on the money and know it...
You better back that up, fella.

I dont have to back up jack shit bubba.....your the big mouth with all the damn info...where is your back up.
 
columbia58 said:
I dont have to back up jack shit bubba.....your the big mouth with all the damn info...where is your back up.
History books.
I know it sucks to be on the losing side, but facts is facts...
You say my facts are in error. Then, pick one of my facts, one by one, and debunk it. I know you can't and you're talking out your ass. :D

Fire away......
 
I waited till quarter of 4 am. Bedtime. :wavey:

Say hi to Scooter and Boss Hog, for me bro :D
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
History books.
I know it sucks to be on the losing side, but facts is facts...
You say my facts are in error. Then, pick one of my facts, one by one, and debunk it. I know you can't and you're talking out your ass. :D

Fire away......

The war was fought over states rights...The 10th Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This amendment was the basis of the doctrine of states' rights that became the ante-bellum rallying cry of the Southern states, which sought to restrict the ever-growing powers of the federal government. The principle of states' rights and state sovereignty eventually led the Southern states to secede from the central government that they believed had failed to honor the covenant that had originally bound the states together.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
I waited till quarter of 4 am. Bedtime. :wavey:

Say hi to Scooter and Boss Hog, for me bro :D

Boss Hog is a fictional character and scooter is a USA Ranger and would whip your ass...
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
History books.
I know it sucks to be on the losing side, but facts is facts...
You say my facts are in error. Then, pick one of my facts, one by one, and debunk it. I know you can't and you're talking out your ass. :D

Fire away......

The war was about freedom from an unfair power. From the time of the first Congress in 1789 to the outbreak of the Civil War there was dissension between the northern and the southern states over the matter of protective tariffs, or import duties on manufactured goods. Northern industries wanted high tariffs in order to protect their factories and laborers from cheaper European products. Demanding that "American laborers shall be protected against the pauper labor of Europe," tariff proponents argued that the taxes gave "employment to thousands of [American] mechanics, artisans, [and] laborers."

The vast majority of American industry was located in the northern states, whereas the economies of the agricultural southern states were based on the export of raw materials and the importation of manufactured goods. The South held few manufacturing concerns, and southerners had to pay higher prices for goods in order to subsidize northern profits.

The collected tariffs were used to fund public projects in the North such as improvements to roads, harbors and rivers. From 1789 to 1845, the North received five times the amount of money that was spent on southern projects. More than twice as many lighthouses were built in the North as in the South, and northern states received twice the southern appropriations for coastal defense.

The sectional friction caused by the tariffs bills eventually led the country to the nullification controversy of 1832, during which South Carolina declared the tariff laws null and void. John C. Calhoun, the father of nullification, developed the theory of secession and detailed the steps by which a state could sever its relationship with the Union and remove itself from the unfair power of the central government. Federal authority prevailed in the nullification crisis of 1832, but the theories developed by Calhoun would be invoked again when the country split apart in 1861.
 
Top Bottom