igf or hgh??

[MASSIVEMONSTER]

Why would people want to run a hgh cycle when it will cost upwards of @@@@@ (say for 5-6 months worth as a minumum) when you can run a cycle of IGF every now and again for a much cheaper price and as good results in a shorter time frame.
I for one will use IGF every post cycle from now on for 4-5 weeks and ditch the HGH.
Can anyone give insight into why people would wanna run hgh instead of igf with all the rave reviews igf is getting coupled with a massive saving one would also make

 

[bluehen]

Why would people want to run a hgh cycle when it will cost upwards of @@@@@@(say for 5-6 months worth as a minumum) when you can run a cycle of IGF every now and again for a much cheaper price and as good results in a shorter time frame.
I for one will use IGF every post cycle from now on for 4-5 weeks and ditch the HGH.
Can anyone give insight into why people would wanna run hgh instead of igf with all the rave reviews igf is getting coupled with a massive saving one would also make

They don't have all the same benefits. The HGH is great for fat loss and holding onto muscle while you are dieting. Besides HGH has a lot more research behind it, no one really knows what IGF is going to do negativly to you.

 

[wayneboard1]

It depends on what your goals are. They are both great compounds that have their place, and depending on what your goals are, that would dictate what compound you would use.

 

[kbrkbr]

Why would people want to run a hgh cycle when it will cost upwards of @@@@@ (say for 5-6 months worth as a minumum) when you can run a cycle of IGF every now and again for a much cheaper price and as good results in a shorter time frame.
I for one will use IGF every post cycle from now on for 4-5 weeks and ditch the HGH.
Can anyone give insight into why people would wanna run hgh instead of igf with all the rave reviews igf is getting coupled with a massive saving one would also make

You need a better source for gh.

A six month cycle of gh costs me less than a third of the figure you quoted. Cheaper than igf.

 

[bluehen]

You need a better source for gh.

A six month cycle of gh costs me less than a third of the figure you quoted. Cheaper than igf.

Unless he is running high amount's, I agree.

 

[wayneboard1]

Why would people want to run a hgh cycle when it will cost upwards of @@@@@ (say for 5-6 months worth as a minumum) when you can run a cycle of IGF every now and again for a much cheaper price and as good results in a shorter time frame.
I for one will use IGF every post cycle from now on for 4-5 weeks and ditch the HGH.
Can anyone give insight into why people would wanna run hgh instead of igf with all the rave reviews igf is getting coupled with a massive saving one would also make

I spaced a bit earlier but price discussion is a BIG no no. Please edit your post. Thanks bro.

 

[MASSIVEMONSTER]

Well if your goal is for added size like surely all bodybuilders would want, would you suggest igf or hgh? I live in uk, think hgh costs more here

 

[kbrkbr]

I live in uk, think hgh costs more here

No, chinese gh costs the same in the UK as the US.

 

[bluehen]

Well if your goal is for added size like surely all bodybuilders would want, would you suggest igf or hgh? I live in uk, think hgh costs more here

For pure size IGF would be the way to go.

 

[kbrkbr]

I spaced a bit earlier but price discussion is a BIG no no. Please edit your post. Thanks bro.

Given that Big Rock Rick has created a sticky which states the exact price for igf charged by one of the board's sponsors, I think that rule is moot.

 

[wayneboard1]

Given that Big Rock Rick has created a sticky which states the exact price for igf charged by one of the board's sponsors, I think that rule is moot.

Two wrongs don't make a right. The sticky should be changed as well.

 

[RADAR]

Given that Big Rock Rick has created a sticky which states the exact price for igf charged by one of the board's sponsors, I think that rule is moot.

I Disagree otherwise


RADAR