If you use SARMS, do they become less effective over time?

[thedarkhalf]

Diminishing returns - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I feel like ^^this definitely applies

Everything in moderation...take time off and then go back on.

 

[hurricane]

I agree, as long as "time on = time off" applies, I've noticed no issues with decreased effectiveness. Using a more potent, quality sarm like sarms1 products will also keep the gains coming cycle after cycle

with gw i have noticed it more then other sarms products.I have no scientific support for this, just my own trial and error.

 

[liffalot]

Well let me add to my previous post regarding this subject:

I just started running some Sarms1 OSTA and GW about a week ago and......wow. It feels even better than I remember my first time ever running those two. So I think the cure for diminishing returns is going to be the purity of Sarms1. Can a brotha get an "amen"?!

 

[hurricane]

Well let me add to my previous post regarding this subject:

I just started running some Sarms1 OSTA and GW about a week ago and......wow. It feels even better than I remember my first time ever running those two. So I think the cure for diminishing returns is going to be the purity of Sarms1. Can a brotha get an "amen"?!

honestly i feel osta can be ran longer then some advise on here without deminishing returns.Of course suppression will go up as well, but yea.

but gw for me. it loses effectivness over time for sure.i would say after 12 weeks, its time for a break for about 4 weeks. then recycle, if you want it to be at optimum levels at all times.

 

[dylangemelli]

in actuality, all of them can be ran twelve weeks... s4 is a bit touchy but if your lucky enough to not have the vision sides too bad then you can definitely run it 12 weeks as well... i have always ran them 12 weeks and continued to show results throughout... you want to run your doses properly and sarms are touchy in terms of crossing a line with dosing but if you run them properly, you can get a nice 12 week cycle and only need 4 weeks off before running them again... OR you can finish a mini pct after and then take a week off and go right into your aas cycle if your using them as a bridge...

 

[stevesmi]

in actuality, all of them can be ran twelve weeks... s4 is a bit touchy but if your lucky enough to not have the vision sides too bad then you can definitely run it 12 weeks as well... i have always ran them 12 weeks and continued to show results throughout... you want to run your doses properly and sarms are touchy in terms of crossing a line with dosing but if you run them properly, you can get a nice 12 week cycle and only need 4 weeks off before running them again... OR you can finish a mini pct after and then take a week off and go right into your aas cycle if your using them as a bridge...

good advice right here. this is exactly the way I do it

 

[liffalot]

Yea if we're talking about diminishing returns between 1 cycle rather than many I would absolutely agree that its probably going to be at about 12 weeks where you'll start seeing diminished returns. And yes all SARMs can be run up to 12 weeks but I would not recommend to ANYONE to run S4 12 weeks. The suppression is just too damn high to extend it past 8 in my experience.......which is unfortunate because its also my favorite SARM.