Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

I am dumb & blind. Or was WTC1 hit with a MISSILE? Conspiracy? Not a boeing 767?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SSAlexSS
  • Start date Start date
VicTusDeuS said:
Even if it was a missle...what did happen to the plane that we all assumed it was? AA is still missing a plane...did it dissapear in the Bermuda Triangle???


1 word.

PENNSYLVANIA crash.
 
VicTusDeuS said:
Even if it was a missle...what did happen to the plane that we all assumed it was? AA is still missing a plane...did it dissapear in the Bermuda Triangle???



PENNSYLVANIA crash.
 
SSAlexSS said:
A plane does NOT explode by simply crashing. Plane crashes and burns, yes. But it doesnt explode like a bomb, unless it has one in it.

Wrong!!! When a plane crashes, as it did in this situation it ABSOLUTELY WOULD explode like that. It was carrying 20,000 lbs of JP-4 Jet fuel which is HIGHLY flammable, and just the force of the crash alone would have sent a huge fireball (resembling an explosion) out from BOTH sides of the building. So, on this you're completely off base.

If the steel explodes outwards as you say, in the direction of the airplane path, the internal structure would be damaged not external ENTRY (the one we are talking about).

The damage was done on both ends, and in both directions, what the fuck are you watching????

2nd) The reason for the flash is to make a hole to make it LOOK like a plane hit it. Some suspect that this was a drone missile of some sort that either

a)carried missiles that struck the building to make the damage look like it was done by boeing or

b) a bomb inside of WTC to make a bigger hole, since a small missile cant do that.

ok, I SAW the video that those firemen on the ground were making when that first plane hit. It IS a plane. I know firsthand what missiles sound like, and that was NOT a missile, I would've been able to tell that strictly from the sound, forget the video. The people that think that that was a drone carrying a warhead are MORONS, plain and simple...

Ok, here we go... Missiles are powered by rockets, which make a HELL of a lot less noise than the HUGE turbofan engines CLEARLY VISIBLE in that video. Is it possible that the hijackers had explosives on the plane?? sure, but VERY unlikely, as the explosions from BOTH impacts were commensurate with the impact of a large aircraft full of highly flammable, gel-like fuel. Anyone who tries to dispute this is a complete ass.



Thats why the hole looked like it was done by a plane.

No, it LOOKED like it was done by a plane because it WAS done by a plane... DUMB??? BLIND??? I don't think it matters, take your pick.
 
SSAlexSS said:



1 word.

PENNSYLVANIA crash.

ok, then what happened to the OTHER PLANE?!?!? Let's not forget that there weere 3 planes that crashed on 9/11, along with all of the people on them... Did the government make up all of thier identities, and the identities of all of thier grieving loved ones??? You're a fucking idiot... and PENNSYLVANIA crash is TWO words..... moron....
 
FLASHMAN1 said:


ok, then what happened to the OTHER PLANE?!?!? Let's not forget that there weere 3 planes that crashed on 9/11, along with all of the people on them... Did the government make up all of thier identities, and the identities of all of thier grieving loved ones??? You're a fucking idiot... and PENNSYLVANIA crash is TWO words..... moron....

Dude. 4 planes. 2 WTC, 1 PA, 1 Pentagon.
 
gettinlarger said:


Dude. 4 planes. 2 WTC, 1 PA, 1 Pentagon.

Oh yeah, almost forgot about that one...lol.... I didn't really forget, but I left that one out because of the context of the conversation... But you're right, I should've said 3 IN THAT AREA on 9/11... Thanks for the correction...
 
FLASHMAN1 said:


Oh yeah, almost forgot about that one...lol.... I didn't really forget, but I left that one out because of the context of the conversation... But you're right, I should've said 3 IN THAT AREA on 9/11... Thanks for the correction...

No problem. Either way, saying that the WTC plane was in reality the PA plane is just plain absurd, and Alex is an idiot for saying it. Seriously man, if youre going to come up with a conspiracy theory, come up with one that might be remotely believable.
 
Well a lot of people dont know this, but my friend from Italy was looking at the pentagon coverage, and he saw a bomb go off in the pentagon rite on tv, all he saw was a bomb not a plane.

But SSALEXSS what if there was some sort of a bomb on the plane, maybe the hijakers blew up a bomb rite before crashing into the building?

That sounds plausible.
 
Well a lot of people dont know this, but my friend from Italy was looking at the pentagon coverage, and he saw a bomb go off in the pentagon rite on tv, he said he didnt see any plane just a bomb.

But SSALEXSS what if there was some sort of a bomb on the plane, maybe the hijakers blew up a bomb rite before crashing into the building, to cause more damage.

That sounds plausible.
 
Top Bottom