A plane does NOT explode by simply crashing. Plane crashes and burns, yes. But it doesnt explode like a bomb, unless it has one in it.
Wrong!!! When a plane crashes, as it did in this situation it ABSOLUTELY WOULD explode like that. It was carrying 20,000 lbs of JP-4 Jet fuel which is HIGHLY flammable, and just the force of the crash alone would have sent a huge fireball (resembling an explosion) out from BOTH sides of the building. So, on this you're completely off base.
If the steel explodes outwards as you say, in the direction of the airplane path, the internal structure would be damaged not external ENTRY (the one we are talking about).
The damage was done on both ends, and in both directions, what the fuck are you watching????
2nd) The reason for the flash is to make a hole to make it LOOK like a plane hit it. Some suspect that this was a drone missile of some sort that either
a)carried missiles that struck the building to make the damage look like it was done by boeing or
b) a bomb inside of WTC to make a bigger hole, since a small missile cant do that.
ok, I SAW the video that those firemen on the ground were making when that first plane hit. It IS a plane. I know firsthand what missiles sound like, and that was NOT a missile, I would've been able to tell that strictly from the sound, forget the video. The people that think that that was a drone carrying a warhead are MORONS, plain and simple...
Ok, here we go... Missiles are powered by rockets, which make a HELL of a lot less noise than the HUGE turbofan engines CLEARLY VISIBLE in that video. Is it possible that the hijackers had explosives on the plane?? sure, but VERY unlikely, as the explosions from BOTH impacts were commensurate with the impact of a large aircraft full of highly flammable, gel-like fuel. Anyone who tries to dispute this is a complete ass.
Thats why the hole looked like it was done by a plane.
No, it LOOKED like it was done by a plane because it WAS done by a plane... DUMB??? BLIND??? I don't think it matters, take your pick.