Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Human Shield Shocked Back Into Reality

p0ink

New member
Lucky Break for Jordan
By Arnaud de Borchgrave
UPI Editor at Large
From the International Desk
Published 3/21/2003 2:46 PM
View printer-friendly version


AMMAN, Jordan, March 21 (UPI) -- An unintended coalition of U.S. air power and Baghdad taxi drivers kept a potential flood of Iraqi refugees away from the Jordanian border Friday. The U.N. refugee agency and the Jordanian government were expecting a quarter of million people to stream across the border. Jordan is already home for 400,000 Iraqi refugees from the first Gulf War.

U.S. fighter bombers took out the only gas station between Baghdad and the border, a distance of 600 kilometers. The one-camel village of Ramadi was also the only phone booth on the desert road and a Jordanian was killed by the explosion of the gas station while making a call to his parents in Amman to let them know he was on his way home.

At the same time, the few taxi drivers in Baghdad willing to run the risk of making it to the Jordanian border are charging $1,500 per passenger. Very few Iraqis can afford the fare. As a result, only some 300 TCNs (Third Country Nationals) reached the border post since the bombing started. They were mostly Sudanese and Egyptians. There were no Iraqis among them. They had to hump their luggage 1.8 miles across no-man's-land on foot to Al Karama, the first Jordanian outpost. From there, they were bused to the tent city at the Ruwaished refugee camp, 36 miles inside Jordan.

The Sudanese and Egyptian governments agreed to pay for Jordanian Airlines charters to fly their nationals home.

A group of American anti-war demonstrators who came to Iraq with Japanese human shield volunteers made it across the border today with 14 hours of uncensored video, all shot without Iraqi government minders present. Kenneth Joseph, a young American pastor with the Assyrian Church of the East, told UPI the trip "had shocked me back to reality." Some of the Iraqis he interviewed on camera "told me they would commit suicide if American bombing didn't start. They were willing to see their homes demolished to gain their freedom from Saddam's bloody tyranny. They convinced me that Saddam was a monster the likes of which the world had not seen since Stalin and Hitler. He and his sons are sick sadists. Their tales of slow torture and killing made me ill, such as people put in a huge shredder for plastic products, feet first so they could hear their screams as bodies got chewed up from foot to head."

Iran informed the UN refugee agency Friday that it now has 3,000 Iraqi refugees. Syria said its numbers were "insignificant." The picture could change for the worse as the United States steps up the bombing of Baghdad with a "shock and awe" campaign designed to stun and collapse what's left of the regime. Acute food shortages are expected before U.S. troops liberate Baghdad. U.N. officials in the Iraqi capital radioed today that some 500 disadvantaged children were suffering from malnutrition and they were rounding whatever supplies they could find.

Prior to the war, some 700 tanker trucks shuttled daily between both countries. Jordan consumes 12,000 tons of oil a day. All of it comes from Iraq at discounted prices under the U.N. oil-for-food program. Some 2,600 and 1,500 Iraqi tankers have been involved in the overland oil traffic. Movement was down to 140 tankers the day before the bombing started. It stopped abruptly two days ago.

Jordan had made plans for a quick switch to tankers anchored off Aqaba. Qatar had pledged to replace whatever shortfall Jordan experienced.

Jordanians see a good omen in the daily arrival of almost 1,000 white storks. They alight near the Safeway on one of Amman's seven hills, a pit stop on their way from Africa to their east European breeding grounds. About 100,000 storks are expected at the Safeway for the next month, numbers not seen in 10 years, and a sign of ample rain and a good harvest.

The official and private views of some ranking Jordanian officials appear to be diametrically opposed. Officially, they condemn the war and say they are "deeply troubled" about the repercussions of the war on the region, and describe the situation as "critical."

Privately, and not for attribution, they say the United States is developing a new opportunity for the Middle East. Said one former prime minister, "If the U.S. can get a new Iraq to recognize Israel as a quid pro quo for a final Palestinian settlement, others will fall into place -- Syria, Saudi Arabia, and the other Gulf states. Iran would then have to pull back its military support for Hezbollah."

Another prominent Jordanian voice said that while Iraq has created a rift between America and its allies, and in Europe itself, the Palestine question -- provided President Bush is serious about a settlement roadmap, without either side allowed to nickel and dime it to oblivion -- could be a reconciling factor. Which all sides now need." The official consensus is that the United States can win wars on its own. But it cannot win the peace. A former foreign minister said, "I can only hope that the $10 billion the U.S. now plans to provide Israel will have a geopolitical price tag."



Copyright © 2001-2003 United Press International
 
Anti-war protesters have no idea: refugee (Iraqi man speaks to australian newspaper)
sydney morning herald | March 23, 2003 | Eamonn Duff

A Sydney Iraqi family has slammed ongoing Australian anti-war protests, saying demonstrators have no idea who or what they are campaigning for.

Dhafir Al-Shammery escaped certain death under Saddam Hussein's regime in 1996. Today he is one of several hundred Iraqis living in Sydney who now know what the term freedom truly means.

In an exclusive interview with The Sun-Herald, he said: "When I see thousands of Australians marching the streets on behalf of the Iraqi people, my heart sinks, because their view is not that of the Iraqi people.

"They [the protesters] say they are making a stand against the war because of human rights issues. They say it is the Iraqi people who will suffer most through this conflict.

"I speak out because they need to be told they are wrong. They need to support their country. They need to be told the truth - and that is that the Iraqi people have been suffering human rights crimes for decades.

"I am sorry, but these protesters cannot even imagine what has gone on there. Nobody would know unless they had lived and suffered it."

Mr Al-Shammery, 38, was one of the Shi'ite Muslim majority crushed by Saddam after the 1991 Gulf War.

When he saw his cousin executed, he fled with six other Iraqis on an open skiff, eight metres long and one metre wide, which for seven days battled two- to three-metre waves. He neither slept nor ate in that time. He simply sat with his knees pressed against his chest and prayed for a day when he would be free.

"I knew I had a 100 per cent chance of death if I stayed [in Iraq] but only a 90 per cent chance of death if I fled in a little boat," he said.

"So I chose the 10 per cent chance of life. Wouldn't you?"

Today he has found that freedom in Fairfield Heights, where he lives with his wife Natalia and his two sons, Mustafa, 6, and Noor, 12. Not only does he run successful security and export businesses, he lives in a street where families from numerous ethnic backgrounds all live in peace and harmony.

"The protesters need to understand that in Iraq, there is no freedom of expression ... not through speech or thought, nothing," he said.

"If you are not with him [Saddam], that means you are against him. A murmur of discontent to your neighbour across the fence can lead to your wife being executed. And then, the Government visits your home and makes you pay money for the bullet that killed her.

"They bring your dead wife, they show you how she was tortured before the bullet put her out of her misery. And if you refuse to pay for the bullet that killed her, they simply take more of your family."

Mr Al-Shammery added: "Cousins of mine disappeared many years ago without trace. We knew what happened to them but we didn't say we knew because you don't say anything to anyone. So we just carried on, suffering, keeping all thoughts to ourselves."

When Mr Al-Shammery arrived in Australia, he was sent to Villawood Detention Centre where he had to remain as an illegal for many months.

When he attempted, through the media, to inform the Australian public of the monstrosities he had fled from, his words somehow filtered back to Iraq.

"I am not sure how they received this information, but they headed straight for my family who were scattered between Najaf and Al Qadisiyah in southern Iraq," he said.

"They took my father but it was my brother who really suffered. They threw him in jail. They tortured him."

Mr Al-Shammery said he felt comfortable telling his story now because he believes America and its allies will finish the job they have started.

"I honestly believe that we will see the Coalition take over very quickly, because the people want this," he said.

"Everywhere in Iraq, they have prayed for this. There will not be any resistance. The army will not fight like [Saddam] thinks it will. I just hope that it can all be done with minimum civilian casualties."

Mr Al-Shammery said his only fear was that when Saddam Hussein realises his people have helped topple him, he may use the weapons of mass destruction the coalition is convinced he possesses.

"That is the concern and that is why they need to find him quickly," he said.
 
"Privately, and not for attribution, they say the United States is developing a new opportunity for the Middle East. Said one former prime minister, "If the U.S. can get a new Iraq to recognize Israel as a quid pro quo for a final Palestinian settlement, others will fall into place -- Syria, Saudi Arabia, and the other Gulf states. Iran would then have to pull back its military support for Hezbollah."



Who in the heck is this dreamer?

That would never happen.
 
"If you are not with him [Saddam], that means you are against him. A murmur of discontent to your neighbour across the fence can lead to your wife being executed. And then, the Government visits your home and makes you pay money for the bullet that killed her.

"They bring your dead wife, they show you how she was tortured before the bullet put her out of her misery. And if you refuse to pay for the bullet that killed her, they simply take more of your family."



That's pretty fucking hardcore!
 
excellent articles, though i'm sure there are some Iraqis & human shields who prefer Saddam over war (there are always 2 sides to every issue).

I still haven't heard any anti war people explain 'how exactly will leaving Saddam in power promote peace & justice in Iraq'.
 
nordstrom said:

I still haven't heard any anti war people explain 'how exactly will leaving Saddam in power promote peace & justice in Iraq'.

that was'nt my argument for not going to war. i want that man taken out. i just did'nt want to have to go to war to do it. my list of reasons is lengthy so suffice it to say that leaving him in power was not one of my options for peace.
 
I think war might be the only way to restore peace, because if we just take out saddam, then there will be other factions squabbling for the throne, and this will just lead to more violence.
 
DAILY NOTEBOOK....


I WAS A NAIVE FOOL TO BE A HUMAN SHIELD FOR SADDAM! .......



March 23, 2003: Today's recommended reading, especially for anti-war activists and Hollywood's fifth column, is a first-person essay by former American human shield Daniel Pepper in The Telegraph (U.K.). In a rambling, revelatory self-confession, a mortified Mr. Pepper lets it all hang out, telling just how deceived and deluded he was about Saddam and Iraq.

The opinion piece is entitled, I WAS A NAIVE FOOL TO BE A HUMAN SHIELD FOR SADDAM, and is well worth reading.

Here's some of what ex-human shield Daniel Pepper has to say:

We on the bus felt that we were sympathetic to the views of the Iraqi civilians, even though we didn't actually know any. The group was less interested in standing up for their rights than protesting against the US and UK governments.

I was shocked when I first met a pro-war Iraqi in Baghdad - a taxi driver taking me back to my hotel late at night. I explained that I was American and said, as we shields always did, "Bush bad, war bad, Iraq good". He looked at me with an expression of incredulity.

As he realised I was serious, he slowed down and started to speak in broken English about the evils of Saddam's regime. Until then I had only heard the President spoken of with respect, but now this guy was telling me how all of Iraq's oil money went into Saddam's pocket and that if you opposed him politically he would kill your whole family.

It scared the hell out of me. First I was thinking that maybe it was the secret police trying to trick me but later I got the impression that he wanted me to help him escape. I felt so bad. I told him: "Listen, I am just a schmuck from the United States, I am not with the UN, I'm not with the CIA - I just can't help you."

Of course I had read reports that Iraqis hated Saddam Hussein, but this was the real thing. Someone had explained it to me face to face. I told a few journalists who I knew. They said that this sort of thing often happened - spontaneous, emotional, and secretive outbursts imploring visitors to free them from Saddam's tyrannical Iraq.

I became increasingly concerned about the way the Iraqi regime was restricting the movement of the shields, so a few days later I left Baghdad for Jordan by taxi with five others. Once over the border we felt comfortable enough to ask our driver what he felt about the regime and the threat of an aerial bombardment.

"Don't you listen to Powell on Voice of America radio?" he said. "Of course the Americans don't want to bomb civilians. They want to bomb government and Saddam's palaces. We want America to bomb Saddam."

We just sat, listening, our mouths open wide. Jake, one of the others, just kept saying, "Oh my God" as the driver described the horrors of the regime. Jake was so shocked at how naive he had been. We all were. It hadn't occurred to anyone that the Iraqis might actually be pro-war.

The driver's most emphatic statement was: "All Iraqi people want this war." He seemed convinced that civilian casualties would be small; he had such enormous faith in the American war machine to follow through on its promises. Certainly more faith than any of us had.

Perhaps the most crushing thing we learned was that most ordinary Iraqis thought Saddam Hussein had paid us to come to protest in Iraq. Although we explained that this was categorically not the case, I don't think he believed us. Later he asked me: "Really, how much did Saddam pay you to come?"


An eye opener for poor Daniel, though we everyday, war-loving, Bush-worshipping right-wingers aren't exactly surprised. To say that Daniel Pepper now realizes he was one of Saddam's useful idiots would be an understatement.

Welcome to the real world, Daniel. Too bad, more of your colleagues in the peace (sic Hate America) contingent haven't had their eyes opened yet. However, that's what the peace movement is all about these days, isn't it? Delusion, self-deception, self-righteousness and hate of the U.S. Peace has little to do with the whole morally-deluded enterprise.
The Iconoclast
 
Poink, I can't believe that most of these anti-war protestors actually think Gulf War II is bad, and totally unwanted, by the Iraqi civilians. Do these morons actually think they like being oppressed, starved, tortured and denied any freedoms while Saddam steals their oil wealth and uses to build about 50 presidential palaces? And the sad fact is, most of these protestors are in college. I hope mommy and daddy know what they are spending (excuse me, wasting) their money on.
 
Well, duh. I thought the pro and anti-war sides all knew they were idiots, there weren't hundreds of people

But I like one Iraqi's point of view... (Salam Pax)

Human Shields Bashing #124
> "Basically, they said we are not going to feed you any longer," said John Ross, an American who has been active in radical causes since he tore up his draft card in 1964. <
Excuse while I wipe the tears from my eyes. Outoutout. He could have at least say something more in line with his “radical cause”. This is a bit insulting actually for some reason I feel offended. FEED YOU? Why does the Iraqi government have to friggin’ feed you, you have volunteered to “help” in country which can’t feed its own population properly (well it could if it spent a bit less on itself and on people like you). There is another good bit:
> The activists accused the Iraqi authorities of trying to use them as pawns in the war with America. <
oh, shockhorror, what a surprise. Back to where you came from. Don’t wait for thank you speeches, outoutout.
> The bitter flight from Iraq follows a showdown with the Iraqi authorities who demanded that they decamp from their hotels in central Baghdad and take up their self-assigned roles as civilian protectors. <
No no, just stay in your hotels, buy souvenirs and make fun of the backward ways of these Iraqis, hope you sent all your friends postcards telling them about the pita and tahini you have been eating while strolling around Baghdad, you tourists. Did you take enough pictures of children begging in the streets to show your friends back home how much you care about the plight of the poor in the third world. Bet they were all shaking hands and promising to see each other at the next “worthy cause” party.
 
HULKSTER said:
Poink, I can't believe that most of these anti-war protestors actually think Gulf War II is bad, and totally unwanted, by the Iraqi civilians. Do these morons actually think they like being oppressed, starved, tortured and denied any freedoms while Saddam steals their oil wealth and uses to build about 50 presidential palaces? And the sad fact is, most of these protestors are in college. I hope mommy and daddy know what they are spending (excuse me, wasting) their money on.


What a turn of events (in a way). the peace loving left are fighting tooth and nail to prevent surgical strikes from removing a dictator and establishing a more humane, more free & wealthy government. Why don't people understand that surgical war is sometimes the lesser of 2 evils?

Thank god they have no say in world events.
 
nordstrom said:



What a turn of events (in a way). the peace loving left are fighting tooth and nail to prevent surgical strikes from removing a dictator and establishing a more humane, more free & wealthy government. Why don't people understand that surgical war is sometimes the lesser of 2 evils?

Thank god they have no say in world events.

Once again, really nice generalization.

I don't know anyone in the peace movement with a brain who doesn't think the "human shields" are, um, misguided. I assume we should likewise characterize all pro-gun people as deranged on the basis of Timothy McVeigh.
 
musclebrains said:


Once again, really nice generalization.

I don't know anyone in the peace movement with a brain who doesn't think the "human shields" are, um, misguided. I assume we should likewise characterize all pro-gun people as deranged on the basis of Timothy McVeigh.

There is no peace movement and their is no pro-gun organization. You are generalizing as well.
 
musclebrains said:


Once again, really nice generalization.

I don't know anyone in the peace movement with a brain who doesn't think the "human shields" are, um, misguided. I assume we should likewise characterize all pro-gun people as deranged on the basis of Timothy McVeigh.


disprove it then. The peaceniks are fighting tooth & nail to indirectly keep Saddam in power by opposing a war to topple him. Its simple cause & effect.
 
nordstrom said:



disprove it then. The peaceniks are fighting tooth & nail to indirectly keep Saddam in power by opposing a war to topple him. Its simple cause & effect.

Yes, that was the same argument we heard about Vietnam. We were aiding and abetting the enemy, Ho. Of course, Richard Nixon ended up aiding and abetting the enemy too.

Your "simple cause and effect" is indeed simple because it ignores an array of objections to the invasion, its timing and actual conduct. And, of course, it exposes the lie that the primary objective is disarmament. The bottom-line argument is akin to saying that if you oppose police brutality you are condoning a criminal's actions.
 
This is all propaganda.

2Thick and musclebrains are telling us the truth. THEY have actually been to Iraq and lived under Saddam's blanket of prosperity and happiness.

This taxi driver (IF that's his real job) was probably a CIA guy or something... like, an American James Bond. Can't you see all of the Iraqi protesting on TV? Holding up signs of Saddam and jeering the U.S. The civilians and the armed Iraqi soldiers there too. Can you believe that? They have soldiers in their towns to protect them from the evil U.S.

Yep... we're definitely the bad guys here.

-Warik
 
Top Bottom