HUCK, Would you please post your drinking winny study

[basskiller]

I've combed the search engine and some one said you posted a study about the effectiveness of drinking winny as related to injecting it!

Or if anyone else has this in their saves files... it would be most helpful...

I've also combed through Medline.

Thanks
bass

 

[basskiller]

A shameless bump!

 

[G-Force]

Yeah I would definately like to see that as well!
Bump

 

[joecool]

Same Here

BUMP

 

[gapster2000]

Every heard of Performing a search?

 

[basskiller]

Every heard of Performing a search?

Do you read? Can you comprehend exactly what your reading?

If you J/K, then say so
bass

 

[basskiller]

up you go

 

[athlete03]

bump

 

[Squat]

bump

 

[marx]

Do you read? Can you comprehend exactly what your reading? ...

LOL

 

[HUCKLEBERRY FINNaplex]

I don't recall pulling up a study on it,just explaining the absorbtion processes,which are literally identical in spite of which route of administration is used.The injectible is 17aa,the oral is 17aa.They both are broken down via hepatic metabolization,and each will pass through the liver multiple times before being ultimately excreted.I don't necesssarily have a problem with injecting it,I just don't think it's necessary.But there are those who swear by winny's ability to increase growth at the site of administration,so maybe therein lies an argument for why one would want to...

 

[Sleepy]

i would drink it for no other reason than to save your ass

 

[G-Force]

Thanks Huck, I hope that will persuade the latest generation that drinking Winny is perfectly feasible cos they respect your opinion!

 

[basskiller]

Thanks Huck, I appreciate the reply. I've been swarming over articles at medline trying to find something, anything that shows that winny or any 17aa steroid taken orally as opposed to injecting would be the same.

The whole thing started over a guy saying that injecting winny is absorbed 50% better than orally.

So I guess I have to try to find something about the trace routes to your liver through oral and injection.

Again, Thanks
bass

 

[panerai]

Hehe..I'm the guy! (username - Small)
Keep looking!

 

[flickenu]

Someone on the fina board (can't remember who) posted a nice little abstract comparing the 2 methods. I want to say his name was Panerai or something like that. Anywho, injection was deemed to yield better absoprtion than drinking. However, if I remember correctly, there was a large percentage of error.

 

[flickenu]

Shit, I didn't read the replies before posting this. it was panerai, but that's not his handle on the fina board.

 

[panerai]

My handle on fina board is Small3.
I know, a lot of believers found that study is a flaw. Personally, I don't think so, and as much as Basskiller is looking for the proof of drinking=injecting, I will be looking for opposite.
If I find evidence, that drinking=injecting, I will gladly post it, it was my original belief, anyway.

 

[G-Force]

Does the fact that this issue is still not resolved, not suggest that a study would have to be done to determine any difference which in itself means that the differences are negligible! Even if it was proved that drinking is slightly less efficient, people would still drink it because of the obvious advantages of simple convenience! I think that the only finding that would deter bro's from drinking Winstrol would be health related and it just doesn't make any sense that a 17AA is harsher because it is ingested rather than injected!

 

[basskiller]

My handle on fina board is Small3.
I know, a lot of believers found that study is a flaw. Personally, I don't think so, and as much as Basskiller is looking for the proof of drinking=injecting, I will be looking for opposite.
If I find evidence, that drinking=injecting, I will gladly post it, it was my original belief, anyway.

Actually I'm looking for the truth... either way is cool with me!

I'm in it for the knowlwdge!

Gym rat over at Ulters board put it best, but again the is no concrete proof!

Be back in a minute with his post!
back

LOL panerai=small3

 

[basskiller]

here is gym rats approach to it

Here we go again... Drink it. Take it orally. There's no need to inject. Stanozolol is an ORAL drug. It was created as an injectible for two reasons: 1) veterinary -- easier to give a cow an injection rather than have them swallow a pill, and 2) for trauma cases -- many times burn victims cannot swallow, so an injectible version of the drug is created. Does it affect the absorption? Hardly. It is a 17-aa drug, meaning it passes through the digestive system with relative ease.

This study stated above I already disputed. Why? They used two different schedules of administration of the drug. Oral was daily, injected was weekly. If the study was going to be truly showing all things equal, the same about would be administred at the same time intervals. The dogs were tested within a couple of days after the injection, so of course it's going to appear as though there is more free drug in their system. It's a bad study.