Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

how much does fat weigh?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elite_Fry
  • Start date Start date
E

Elite_Fry

Guest
??? like on a 5'11 guy... 1% bodyfat would be how many pounds?? is there anyway to predict?
 
it depends on your weight

and 1% bodyfat is not possible

5-6% is very lean
 
i mean it was just as an explain.. 1% bodyfat loss would be how many pounds
lets say of someone who weighs around the 170 pound mark
 
if you weigh 170 pounds

1% bodyfat ==> 1.7 pounds of fat
5% ==> 8.5
10% ==> 17

and 1 pound fat = 4082 calories

is that want you were loking for :confused:
 
Here's a link to a not too bad bodyfat calculator. Not perfect, but might help you figure out what you need to know.

http://kingspawn.home.att.net/BodyFat.htm

It's not always related to poundage, either, because if you gain muscle it will offset how much you need to lose 1% of fat. For example, just started a new program about 10 days ago, only lost four pounds, but gained muscle and lost 2% of fat. Now, I KNOW that 1% of fat does not always equal 2 pounds. In the past, I've had to lose up to 6 pounds to lose 1%, because I had plateaued on the muscle gains.

Is different for everyone and muscle gain has to be figured in.

Impossible. Give the calculator a shot and good luck.

BTW - you need Excel to run it.
If you don't have Excel, try this one: http://www.biofitness.com/bodyfat.html

I prefer the Excel one, because it tracks your progress.

Fawn
 
Does anyone think like me that bodyfat% is stupid?

What I mean is if a guy is 200Lbs and has a 5% bodyfat, and another guy is 300LBs and has a 5% Bodyfat.
The second guy is actually quite fat compared to the first person!
10LBs of fat on him verses 15LBs on the 2nd guy.

I'd rather have a measurement that says, the exact LBs of bodyfat you have rather than a percentage. Becuase as you gain muscle your bodyfat % actually drops even if you don't lose any fat!!!
 
Quite honestly, I didn't really understand what you're trying to say. If there COULD be a 300 lb guy with only 5% bf, what difference does it make if it's 15 pounds of bodyfat or 10? He'd probably have to be 7 feet tall, anyway.


The link to the Excell spreadsheet I posted will tell you how many of the pounds on you are actually just fat.

Fawn
 
Well all I'm saying if your fat and you increase your muscle mass, your bodyfat pecentage has dropped, even though your still fat, ie your face is still chubby.
 
Often you hear people say "muscle weighs more than fat" in order to rationalise putting on weight.

Why would a 1kg of fat weigh more than a 1kg of muscle? No reason. It doesn't.
 
bm2k said:
Why would a 1kg of fat weigh more than a 1kg of muscle? No reason. It doesn't.

A pound of fat weighs the same as a pound of muscle - the only difference being that the muscle is denser and takes up less space, and is vital living tissue rather than "storage" and thus actually burns fat.

A pound of muscle takes more calories per day to maintain than a pound of fat. Once you put on that muscle, it'll start burning fat to maintain itself - so you ARE halfway there.

It really does make a big difference - actually. There's a big difference between a guy who weighs 220 and has a 12% bodyfat and a guy who's 220 and has 28% bodyfat. For one, the first one is a babe and the second is just chubby.


Fawn
 
CoolColJ said:
Does anyone think like me that bodyfat% is stupid?

What I mean is if a guy is 200Lbs and has a 5% bodyfat, and another guy is 300LBs and has a 5% Bodyfat.
The second guy is actually quite fat compared to the first person!
10LBs of fat on him verses 15LBs on the 2nd guy.

I'd rather have a measurement that says, the exact LBs of bodyfat you have rather than a percentage. Becuase as you gain muscle your bodyfat % actually drops even if you don't lose any fat!!!

Rethink your logic. If a guy 200lber has 5% body fat then that means 190 lbs is lean body mass while the 300lber is 285 of lbm. Assuming the same height, the second guy has way bigger muscles than the first guy and should be WAY shredded than the first guy.

We like to use bodyfat percentages because it tells you how defined you are, or how much of your weight is muscle.
 
Size of the muscle doesn't have anything to do with being shredded, since most of the fat is under the skin

But I suppose in this case, if the 300 lb guy is taller then the fat will be spread out over a larger area so he should be leaner :)
But if he's not, then he is fatter ;)
 
CoolColJ said:
Size of the muscle doesn't have anything to do with being shredded, since most of the fat is under the skin

But I suppose in this case, if the 300 lb guy is taller then the fat will be spread out over a larger area so he should be leaner :)
But if he's not, then he is fatter ;)

You think 5lbs of bodyfat vs 95lbs of pure muscle isn't going to make a guy look way more ripped? The increase of fat is negligible vs the increase of muscle that the bigger guy has, again assuming same height.
 
bm2k said:
Often you hear people say "muscle weighs more than fat" in order to rationalise putting on weight.

Why would a 1kg of fat weigh more than a 1kg of muscle? No reason. It doesn't.
Haha, that's so true. When you say it that way, it does sound absurd. "Which weighs more, 1 kg of feathers or 1 kg of bricks?"

I've been guilty of using the "muscle weighs more", but, I'm usually using it in regards to density. I'm pretty lean, and my friend is kinda stocky. Someone was pointing out how "thin" I am compared to him. I then asked him how much he weighed and I said I weighed the same. People were questioning how that could be, and I used the "muscle weighs more than fat" line. I suppose I should have said "muscle is more dense than fat" to be correct.
 
bm2k said:
Often you hear people say "muscle weighs more than fat" in order to rationalise putting on weight.

Why would a 1kg of fat weigh more than a 1kg of muscle? No reason. It doesn't.

but a bowlful of muscle would weigh more than a bowlful of fat...
 
flubberboy said:


but a bowlful of muscle would weigh more than a bowlful of fat...

What the hell are you on about? Seriously...

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
 
Fat -vs- muscle volume?

So, how much volume does one pound of fat take up and how much volume does one pound of muscle take up?

Would a one pound box of butter take up the same volume as one pound of body fat? Is that an acceptable comparison? And would one pound of muscle use as much volume as say, one pound of lean meat?
 
Re: Fat -vs- muscle volume?

arjuna said:
So, how much volume does one pound of fat take up and how much volume does one pound of muscle take up?

Would a one pound box of butter take up the same volume as one pound of body fat? Is that an acceptable comparison? And would one pound of muscle use as much volume as say, one pound of lean meat?

I think the debate was over the incorrect logic of people saying that "muscle weighs more" when in fact they mean to say "muscle is more dense than fat". So, a pound of muscle would take up less space than a pound of fat.
 
Re: Re: Fat -vs- muscle volume?

Warblade said:


I think the debate was over the incorrect logic of people saying that "muscle weighs more" when in fact they mean to say "muscle is more dense than fat". So, a pound of muscle would take up less space than a pound of fat.

Precisely.
 
bm2k said:


What the hell are you on about? Seriously...

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

are you stupid??
 
BOTH OF YOU ARE STUPID

A pound of muscle and a pound of fat BOTH weigh a FREAAKIN' POUND.......you idiots!

NOw, a pound of fat will be about three, yes 3 times the size of the pound of muscle..........so your bowl would LOOK as if it had more fat in it. That's why 2 people that weigh the same can be very different looking if one is 30% body fat and the other 10%.

Hope that helped.

STOOPids!
:p
muscleNOT4u
 
Re: BOTH OF YOU ARE STUPID

muscle4u said:
A pound of muscle and a pound of fat BOTH weigh a FREAAKIN' POUND.......you idiots!

NOw, a pound of fat will be about three, yes 3 times the size of the pound of muscle..........so your bowl would LOOK as if it had more fat in it. That's why 2 people that weigh the same can be very different looking if one is 30% body fat and the other 10%.

Hope that helped.

STOOPids!
:p
muscleNOT4u

Indeed, I was just being a smart-arse (because what was being said was so bloody obvious!) when I originally poked fun at him. Sarcasm can go missing in text.
 
Yup, muscle is more DENSE than fat. Imagine a bucket of fat vs a bucket of muscle. The latter would weigh a lot more. As for bf%, those varry too. 8% doesn't always mean you're ripped, and 12% doesn't always mean you're "fat".

A 150lb guy with 8%bf will not look anywhere near as shredded as a 200lb guy with 8%bf.
 
Five pounds of bodyfat has around the same volume as a shoebox! I think you know the volume of five pounds of lean beef. Thats why a cut 190 pound guy in long sleeve shirt etc. is just as big as a normal 170 pound dude. But when the shirt comes off...
 
Top Bottom