HGH question...

[satchboogie]

since hgh doesnt shutdown hpta, doesnt it make sense to take hgh in the 'off cycle' period?

 

[BrickGirl]

Of course, its one of the best things to take

 

[BigAndy69]

It the single best use for GH IMO.

 

[solidspine]

I take it year round,

 

[ripper911]

at what dose ?

 

[stealth]

7 i.u split morning and late afternoon

 

[Dr. M]

You could take hGH in the off-cycle, then put it in a cycle, then take some more after that cycle... oh, did I mention that you could take some more after that too?

I'd love to try hGH, but can't afford it right now.

-M

 

[Nelson Montana]

That's exactly waht the pros in the 90's would do as a "bridge."

But today, most pros never go off.

I maintain though, for most peoples purposes, at afforable dosages, GH is pretty much as waste. Not to mention, it supresses natural production of GH.

 

[poantrex]

That's exactly waht the pros in the 90's would do as a "bridge."

But today, most pros never go off.

I maintain though, for most peoples purposes, at afforable dosages, GH is pretty much as waste. Not to mention, it supresses natural production of GH.

There is no evidence that exo-GH disrupts natural production. In fact, i've seen a few studies indicating that it doesn't disrupt natural production - would you like some references LOL

 

[DrJMW]

Most people have very low HGH levels after the age of 25 anyway; this is natural aging. And, today, at 4.00 per IU, HGH is affordable to many people now.

 

[Nelson Montana]

There is no evidence that exo-GH disrupts natural production. In fact, i've seen a few studies indicating that it doesn't disrupt natural production - would you like some references LOL

Uh oh. Where have I heard that before?

Actually, that's something I heard from 3 different doctors who were presecribing GH therepy a few years back. One was Nadler, another was Adrienne Denise and I can't remember the name of the third. Werner, I think. Anyway, it makes sense that any exogenous compound will supress endogenous production, but yeah, this is one where I admit I don't have any concrete proof. But if I had to bet, I'd say it did.

 

[Latamier]

I have been fortunate enough to be able to run my GH for six months at a time straight through the entire length of my cycle. I have yet to use it off cycle, but can definately see the advantages to doing so. Maybe next time I'll try this, but I would like to hear more of the members that have done this tell of their results first. HGH is definately not cheap.

 

[ironmaster]

ExoGH does suppress endoGH production, but it is not a complete shutdown, and only lasts a matter of hours.

 

[ripper911]

So is it a good idea reguardless the price to run 2iu's GH through your cycle and all through post cycle and then come off when your about to go on AAS again..... Total 6 mo.