Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
HumorMe
New member
I found this article in our state newspaper this morning. It seems Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are at it again. These two so called "Rev.'s" must be finding it harder and harder to find things to bitch about. In this particular "cause", they seem to believe that Harvard Professor Cornel West should be given the opportunity to pursue outside interests rather than teaching his students, for which he was hired to do in the first place! These two lame excuses for human flesh have sunken lower than eel shit to further their cause. Their cause is none other than to line their pockets with cash and to promote unrest in areas they deem necessary. I can't believe that these two individuals are respected in the political and religious arenas. I find it ironic the author of this article, Armstrong Williams, is an African-American and quite obviously is embarassed by Jesse and Al's actions.
http://web.thestate.com/content/columbia/2002/01/10/opcolumn/williamsweb10.htm
Here we go again
By ARMSTRONG WILLIAMS ÊÊTribune Media Services
Here we go again. Rev. Jesse Jackson and Rev. Al Sharpton are once again hard at work wagging their fingers.
This time their object of scorn is Lawrence H. Summers, Harvard University president and former Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration. Apparently, Summers had the audacity, I mean the sheer nerve, to request that Cornel West, Harvard professor and distinguished black American academic, focus on his duties as an instructor, as opposed to releasing music CDs and leading a presidential exploratory committee for Sharpton.
In other words, Summers requested that West make a priority of his students. Jackson and Sharpton took immediate offense.
Mr. Summers is infringing upon Mr. West's "academic freedom," snarled Jackson.
Jackson thinks this is a bad thing. Apparently, he believes that academics ought to be beyond reproach and "free" to pursue whatever suits their fancy, regardless of how it effects their ability to teach their students.
Sharpton is touting a similar tune. "I feel aggrieved," Sharpton squawked, "if I can't have who I want to have work for me."
Apparently, it does not matter to Sharpton that West already has a full-time job. Apparently, Sharpton fancies himself the center of the universe and is, therefore, understandably "aggrieved" whenever someone else takes a different view.
His response: Sit back and snort racism.
Jackson and Sharpton have gone on to criticize Summers for not fully endorsing affirmative action at Harvard University. For obvious reasons, neither Jackson nor Sharpton mentioned that the Supreme Court has cited Harvard's admissions process as an ideal model. Nor, for that matter, did they acknowledge that Harvard University has long stressed racial diversity and is widely acknowledged to have the country's most prominent African-American studies department.
Instead, Jackson and Sharpton did what they always do: Appeal to the lowest common denominator.
The jig goes something like this: Sharpton and Jackson see some opening where they can exploit our racial sensitivity. Then they move in, threatening to replicate with mobs and bad press if their demands aren't met (often their demands include no small amount of financial gain for themselves). Bottom line: They make their living as racketeers, offering to inflame or quell racial tensions at a cost.
Not surprisingly, Jackson threatened that "Mr. Summers risks losing several key professors" if their demands aren't met.
Early on in the civil rights movement, this sort of racial racketeering was the only viable recourse black leaders had for pressuring companies into hiring more blacks and pushing important equality issues into the mainstream. Forty years later, these tactics serve little more purpose than to line the coffers of men like Jackson and Sharpton, preventing the nation from moving beyond those initial first steps of the civil rights movement.
Under the guise of civil rights activists, Sharpton and Jackson are presently pulling apart the premier African-American studies department in the country.
Congratulations, gentlemen. Once again, you've left your mark.
Visit Mr. Williams on the Web at www.armstrongwilliams.echurchonline.com.
http://web.thestate.com/content/columbia/2002/01/10/opcolumn/williamsweb10.htm
Here we go again
By ARMSTRONG WILLIAMS ÊÊTribune Media Services
Here we go again. Rev. Jesse Jackson and Rev. Al Sharpton are once again hard at work wagging their fingers.
This time their object of scorn is Lawrence H. Summers, Harvard University president and former Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration. Apparently, Summers had the audacity, I mean the sheer nerve, to request that Cornel West, Harvard professor and distinguished black American academic, focus on his duties as an instructor, as opposed to releasing music CDs and leading a presidential exploratory committee for Sharpton.
In other words, Summers requested that West make a priority of his students. Jackson and Sharpton took immediate offense.
Mr. Summers is infringing upon Mr. West's "academic freedom," snarled Jackson.
Jackson thinks this is a bad thing. Apparently, he believes that academics ought to be beyond reproach and "free" to pursue whatever suits their fancy, regardless of how it effects their ability to teach their students.
Sharpton is touting a similar tune. "I feel aggrieved," Sharpton squawked, "if I can't have who I want to have work for me."
Apparently, it does not matter to Sharpton that West already has a full-time job. Apparently, Sharpton fancies himself the center of the universe and is, therefore, understandably "aggrieved" whenever someone else takes a different view.
His response: Sit back and snort racism.
Jackson and Sharpton have gone on to criticize Summers for not fully endorsing affirmative action at Harvard University. For obvious reasons, neither Jackson nor Sharpton mentioned that the Supreme Court has cited Harvard's admissions process as an ideal model. Nor, for that matter, did they acknowledge that Harvard University has long stressed racial diversity and is widely acknowledged to have the country's most prominent African-American studies department.
Instead, Jackson and Sharpton did what they always do: Appeal to the lowest common denominator.
The jig goes something like this: Sharpton and Jackson see some opening where they can exploit our racial sensitivity. Then they move in, threatening to replicate with mobs and bad press if their demands aren't met (often their demands include no small amount of financial gain for themselves). Bottom line: They make their living as racketeers, offering to inflame or quell racial tensions at a cost.
Not surprisingly, Jackson threatened that "Mr. Summers risks losing several key professors" if their demands aren't met.
Early on in the civil rights movement, this sort of racial racketeering was the only viable recourse black leaders had for pressuring companies into hiring more blacks and pushing important equality issues into the mainstream. Forty years later, these tactics serve little more purpose than to line the coffers of men like Jackson and Sharpton, preventing the nation from moving beyond those initial first steps of the civil rights movement.
Under the guise of civil rights activists, Sharpton and Jackson are presently pulling apart the premier African-American studies department in the country.
Congratulations, gentlemen. Once again, you've left your mark.
Visit Mr. Williams on the Web at www.armstrongwilliams.echurchonline.com.
