Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Glenn Pendlay's Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anthrax Invasion
  • Start date Start date
A

Anthrax Invasion

Guest
I recently ordered three training books that were highly recommended to me. Starting Strength, The Strongest Shall Survive, and Defying Gravity. I expect them to arrive next week, and am anticipating them greatly. I know the authors of these books are highly respected, and recently I've heard news of Glenn Pendlay releasing a book of his own. I believe the title was "Practical Periodization". Has anyone heard anything about the book and its release date?
 
I hadn't heard of it, but I'll get it if it's true. I love reading stuff from these guys, real straightforward and practical.
 
Jim Ouini said:
I hadn't heard of it, but I'll get it if it's true. I love reading stuff from these guys, real straightforward and practical.

Hence the name of his book! :FRlol:

I found this, for anyone interested. It's a posting by Glenn:

1. you are classified BY ME as a beginner, intermediate, or advanced depending on the amount of variation in your training you need to make progress. this is related to how long you have been training, but not neccessarily to how strong you are. some people are never, never going to bench more than 400lbs. is a person who has been training 10 years and has reached 99.9% of their genetic potential a beginner just becasue they are only benching 300lbs? no.

2. the whole concept of beginner, intermediate, and advanced is based off of the following. a beginner can increase the weight on the bar almost every workout, doing the same thing. hundreds, thousands maybe, of beginners have come through WFAC in the past 20 years. all are taught to squat correctly. all can add at least 5lbs to their max set of 5 on the squat 1 or 2 times per week if the squat is done correctly for at least 2-3 months. most for 4-6 months. some for a year. if it is done correctly. this is without any variation in training at all. just adding 5lbs to the work set, and pushing them under the bar and making them do it.

now think about it. is there any faster way to increase your strength than to simply increase the weight on the bar and do it for the same number of reps as you did a lesser weight the last workout? NO. so if you are capable of it, why not do it? most are capable of it for quite a few months after starting training. many, very many, are capable of it if properly motivated and coached after years of training incorrectly. if you are a "beginner" and are capable of this typ e of training, and are doing something more compicated, you are simply wasting time. why increase every 8 weeks when you could increase every training session? beginners should train very simply.

for a beginner, changing the MEANS of training is more effecient than changing the planning... in other words, change to 5 singles, or 3 sets of 10, or whatever, and try to keep linear progress going before you start to get complicated. if you change the means of training, but keep the steady progression, you get faster progress than if yo change to some complicated periodized program that lets you do a new max every 12 weeks!

we start beginners by working to one max set of 5 on monday and friday, with a lighter day on wednesday.

before they try ANY periodization, they will switch to several different rep schemes to try to keep progress going.

INTERMEDIATE is a person who can not progress this way any more. they will do several things. all involve short term "periodization" or altering the workouts so that they have varying stress levels over a week or over as much as a month. this type of p0erson will have by now experimented with several training means, all the way from multiple heavy singles, to speed work, and be doing sort term variation using a progression of training means. think of the westside dynamic day squat cycle, you know, something like 50% 10X2, 55% 10X8, 60% 10X6... think of the "pendlay" or whatever, jeez hated typing that, squat program fo doing 5 sets of 5 on monday, front squats on wednesday, and one max set of 5 on friday... not going much more into this becasue of the book coming out and the fact that i want everyone to have to pay $$$ for it, but thats an intermediate. a guy who can still make progress on a weekly or monthly basis with a little short term variation in their workouts.

an ADVANCED guy is the one who has to plan for several months, even a year or more, for measurable progress. to make progress just by changing the training means, he would have to do something so off the wall that even though he was progressing on what he was doing, he would be detraining for the event he was traiing for. he requires long term planning. again, since i want $$$ from the book, im not going to go into more detail. although i feel like a stupic dumbass for even saying that. oh well, the house payment has to be made, and thats that.

training is made too hard by too many people. its simply a matter of making the fastest progress you can, training int eh most specific way to you particular event that you can. variation is a trade-off. its nice to keep linear progression going as long as possible, increase from workout to workout. but when does the variation in training means required to do this become so great as to interfere with progress toward your specific goal? when and why should you change you level of planning, go to something more long-term instead of just doing speed squats instead of 5 by 5? or something like that.

i dont recomend specific programs really... at least not so much. what i recomend is a long term outlook towards training. a step by step approach. in reality, a very simple approach.

Another...

the madcow and meso programs are cut and paste jobs on routines and posts that i wrote on other boards long ago.

the reason there are so many "variations" is that this is really not a workout, but a general progression of training, starting off doing one thing and gradually changing the plan as the months/years go by to keep progress going. thats why you see some "versions" where you always pyramid up, some where you pyramid one day and not the other, some where you do straight sets every day as a load period then de-load. that isnt 3 different versions of a program, its all from the same program but looking at different stages of it.

its annoying to me that people continue to cut and paste things i have written over the years, and present them as a stand alone program that is somehow magic. maybe i have given this impression and am to blame... certainly im sure none of these people mean any harm, and from what i hear the programs have been usefull to some.

but no one program is magic, and it irks me when someone else comes along with a magic mix of sets and reps and claims that HE has discovered the BEST way to train, so it irks me when i feel like i am being set up, or at least some programs i have written are being set up, as doing that.

it may be presumtuous to take on the mantle of the "5 by 5" all by myself, but since i cant find ANY thread about it anywhere that doesnt start with at least some cut and paste from something i wrote and maybe some reference to bill starr... and since i know bill and really most of the training "style" that i use originates with him... well because of that i think i can speak at least a little bit for the 5 by 5 program.

this is NOT a stand alone program. Neither bill starr, rippetoe, or me ever intended to present one version of this "program". following the "5 by 5" as it has been called oddly enough doesnt even mean you have to always do sets of 5. what it is is a method of training simply, very simply and basically. starting out with little or no variation or periodization and little volume... and adding as years and months go by both volume and variation to your workouts.

Thought I'd share. Oh, set release for the new book is early 2006, or so says Glenn.
 
I guess I was onto something when I recommended people always start on the single factor :)

The new book looks awesome, and the above quotes have the simple and straight-to-the-point writing style that makes this stuff easy to pick up and use.

I can't wait for this to be published (and I'll make sure it isn't delivered by surface to the UK this time :rolleyes: )

Thanks for the heads up AI.
 
Top Bottom