GH prices

[ironmaster]

Regarding Chinese GH.....

"First of all, the maroon capped Chinabase GH is fake. The real stuff has a blue top. That's the first issue. The second issue is that real Chinabase GH is "for research use only" and isn't intended for human consumption because it's not purified to the level of other products like Nutropin, Saizen or Humatrope. So there may be a bunch of extraneous cellular residue (garbage you don't want to be injecting) in the lyophilized vials. " Brock Strasser.

I can get chinese GH all day for dirt cheap, but I'm not injecting any "extraneous cellular residue".

 

[ROIDRANGER]

actually i heard those maroon tops were pretty good.. ...and the chinese blue tops are the shit!!!!

 

[nyironman]

[email protected]

 

[Bodymike]

I get 45iu from novo at 106$ from a bro there work at novo

Bodymike

 

[ironmaster]

That's why I put that in "quotes" from a Strasser article, Roidranger. I don't know from personal experience. IP only offers the blue tops, he would know.
I was more interested in the purity and effectiveness issue, anyway. Strasser insists that Chinabase must be refrigerated prior to reconsitution, as well.

 

[40butpumpin]

Ironmaster, (I guess this is for Brock actually), why the hell would Chinabases make a certain color top that was real and another color top that was fake. Now I know we bodybuilders are not supposed to be the scholarly types, but damn, it sure doesn't take a genius to figure out that they'd be pretty stupid to try that. And on the "extraneous cellular residue" issue. Could you (or Brock) please tell me WTF that means? I mean if you, or Brock make a statement like that, you should be able to explain what it means. That's a bunch of horse shit.

 

[Mtime1]

I've been getting Russian for $4.50 IU or $567/126IU. It works.

 

[ironmaster]

Hey, 40, do you have personal experience or knowledge to share on Chinese GH, or are you do you just like to argue? A forum is a place to share information....that's all we are doing here. I'm sure Strasser would be happy to address your comments.....he writes for T-Mag.
Oh, he is saying that the maroon tops are counterfeit - not that Chinabase makes a fake and a real, obviously. Lack of purity - research grade vs. human grade - is self-explanatory. US researchers don't use human grade GH on animal studies either.

 

[40butpumpin]

Mr

IM, nope, don't "just like to argue." But I do question some person's motivation for smashing another product without backing up their claim with proof. I know Brock writes for t-mag, I've been reading them/him for a few years now. Umm, I know what a forum is for, thanks. I understand you were 'sharing' Brock's opinion, however, I was simply 'sharing' my opinion on Brock's opinion. I do have experience with Chinabases in fact. I haven't, however, sent out any to a lab for quantification of extraneous cellular residue. Lack of purity? Again, in my opinion, that's total BS. If the following statements are not saying Chinabases makes one fake and one real I must be losing it: "First of all, the maroon capped Chinabase GH is fake. The real stuff has a blue top. That's the first issue."

 

[ironmaster]

See, that's what I want to hear. Tell me about your experiences with Chinabase. Did you have the blue or maroon?
His third sentence says"the real chinabase...", which leads me to believe that he is calling the other a counterfeit.
Are you saying that Strasser has a reason to bash Chinabase, in favor of another product.
Everyone is entitled to their own preferences. Personally, I'll go with a product that I know to be safe and effective from years of personal experience, but I'm always interested in additional information, but minus the attitude.