Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Foster or Tate

DaBangEm

New member
Drafted Foster in my fantasy league. He slipped to the fourth spot and I couldn't pass him up. I did get Tate very late in the draft cause I think hr is by far the better back over D Ward and they are saying it's gonna be a game time decision on Foster playing.

My thinking is they are not gonna play him but keep the Colts guessing all the way up till game time then play Tate and Ward instead. So should I just start Tate in his spot? I don't think the Texans have too much to worry about with a Manning-less Colts team so why would they rush him back?
 
what is the latest time u can set your lineup? wait till gameday and check cbsportsline or something .. they might have an update.. if no update i would use foster..going either way is a gamble..id go with the better player
 
Impossible to ascertain without applicable punching power digital observations.


just sayin'





Drago is in my fantasy league

Impossible without utilizing 1985 technology for most accuracy
 
My fantasy league consists of me banging Natalie Portman from the rear while Mila Kunis tickles my ball sack and Gisele Bundchen is making me a sammich in my kitchen.




just sayin'
 
u dont have another decent running back? i might just sit foster and play tolbert.. not worth the risk..even if he does start it might be limited carries

kubiak announced today that if foster doesnt start.. ward will be the starting running back..for whatever that is worth
 
u dont have another decent running back? i might just sit foster and play tolbert.. not worth the risk..even if he does start it might be limited carries

kubiak announced today that if foster doesnt start.. ward will be the starting running back..for whatever that is worth

They keep pushing ward but IMO Tate is the better back. Come game time that dude shines. I have some thin backs that may pan out the rest of the year. I could sit Tate put in R. Brown and add L Evans or some other wideout in my flex. But I'm salivating with Foster and Tate going against Indy's pitiful run defense.
 
They keep pushing ward but IMO Tate is the better back. Come game time that dude shines. I have some thin backs that may pan out the rest of the year. I could sit Tate put in R. Brown and add L Evans or some other wideout in my flex. But I'm salivating with Foster and Tate going against Indy's pitiful run defense.

nah i mean a decent starting rb lol..i would start either over brown without thinking twice
 
Top Bottom