WizKid25 said:
If i got suited up i would shoot some afghans.
We're going to Iraq you fucking idiot.
BigRedCat: Better off with our puppet goverment? I hope so, but I fear it's only at first... remember that WE INSTALLED Saddam in the first place...look how he turned out to be.
Rumsfeld shaking Saddam's hand:
So spectre, are we REALLY going to "install" a better "democracy" this time... when is the last time we "installed" a benevolent "democracy" aka "dictatorship." If we install it, it's a dictatorship.... when was the last time anyone had a benevolent dictator? Especially in the mideast.
I love you guys who think that the opinions of other countries are simply irrelevant. Talk about arrogance.
BRC, now if we are really going to do something useful and go after the Saudis, than GREAT, let's dump Israel while we're at it, but somehow I dont see that in the near future.
And again,
WHY DO NONE OF YOU QUESTION THE FACT THAT SUDDENLY 'BIN LADEN IS NOT IMPORTANT'
George Bush:
September 13, 2001:
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama Bin Laden. It's our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
March 13, 2002:
"I don't know where he is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
I personally am more concerned with Bin Laden, the one who masterminded 5 fucking terrorist attacks against the US in the past 12 years, than Saddam, who has masterminded ZERO.
I agree that Saddam is bad news regardless, and needs to go, BUT NOT LIKE THIS. The situation IS NOT SO URGENT that we need to alienate the entire world doing so.
Btw, the Bushies and the Bin Ladens go way back...one member of the Bin Laden family helped fund junior Bushie's first oil companies. Cute isnt it.