Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
Nutrient-Nut
New member
By Brock Strasser (Q&A)
(Question)
How does Finaplix rate against Halotestin? I know that Halo will be a little more toxic because it's an oral, but what about the result? Fina is a good fat-burner, but does Halo have the same abilities? Please set the record straight once and for all.
(Answer)
Halotestin (fluoxymesterone) has traditionally been popular with football players and boxers as it has a reputation for really kicking up aggression levels. Most folks don't gain a heck of a lot of size with Halo (when used alone, at least), but they claim that it "hardens" them up. Relatively speaking, it's one of the more hepatotoxic steroids, but if one keeps the daily dose under 20 mg per day and uses it for under 30 days per year, it's unlikely that one would have much of a problem. It's an oral, while Fina is not.
Finaplix (trenbolone acetate) also has a reputation for hardening people up and is known for causing increased aggression. However, it seems to be a better mass-builder than Halo. Both will probably help you lose some fat but, on a "milligram per milligram" basis, Halo is perhaps twice as strong, yet you won't take nearly as much Halo as you would Fina.
This is a difficult question to answer, but I'm going to speculate that 20 mg of Halo per day is probably slightly more effective than, say, 40 mg of Fina. Which one is better to use? That depends on what you have access to, I suppose. I'd probably pick the Halo because it's easier to use (being an oral meant for human consumption) while Fina is a cattle implant that you'll have to screw around with considerably before you can use it.
(Question)
How does Finaplix rate against Halotestin? I know that Halo will be a little more toxic because it's an oral, but what about the result? Fina is a good fat-burner, but does Halo have the same abilities? Please set the record straight once and for all.
(Answer)
Halotestin (fluoxymesterone) has traditionally been popular with football players and boxers as it has a reputation for really kicking up aggression levels. Most folks don't gain a heck of a lot of size with Halo (when used alone, at least), but they claim that it "hardens" them up. Relatively speaking, it's one of the more hepatotoxic steroids, but if one keeps the daily dose under 20 mg per day and uses it for under 30 days per year, it's unlikely that one would have much of a problem. It's an oral, while Fina is not.
Finaplix (trenbolone acetate) also has a reputation for hardening people up and is known for causing increased aggression. However, it seems to be a better mass-builder than Halo. Both will probably help you lose some fat but, on a "milligram per milligram" basis, Halo is perhaps twice as strong, yet you won't take nearly as much Halo as you would Fina.
This is a difficult question to answer, but I'm going to speculate that 20 mg of Halo per day is probably slightly more effective than, say, 40 mg of Fina. Which one is better to use? That depends on what you have access to, I suppose. I'd probably pick the Halo because it's easier to use (being an oral meant for human consumption) while Fina is a cattle implant that you'll have to screw around with considerably before you can use it.
