Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Femara , Arimidex, Or Aromasin??????????

tbro

New member
I AM SO CONFUSED HERE

First, people said Liquidex was the shizznit and then came
these others......what gives



help
 
anastrozole is the same as liquidex. femara is slightly better as an anti-e but both seem to have more of a negative impact on lipid profiles than aromasin which is much more powerfull than both of them.
 
so you are saying that aromasin is the shit........and that being enuff said

what kind of prices are aromasin
 
it really comes down to personal preferance, since everybody is diffrent, they work diffrently on diffrent people

JC
 
Heres the order. Starting from the best.
Aromasin, Femara, and Liquidex or arimidex.
Then Nolva, Proviron, clomid etc....
 
The original Aromasin is around $6.50 per 25mg tab.
But theres also a Chinese generic version of Aromasin (Exemestane) for $3.50.
 
There still isnt a ton of data on aromasin with AAS use, but aromasin seems to be a lot easier on lipid profiles than let and ana. Its also extremely powerfull and while many docs who prescribe it just tell their clients to use 1 tab daily you may be able to get by with much less than that.
 
SOLID said:
Intrested. Do you recommend it even with low doses of aromatisable gear?
Well, if your on low dose then I would say dont use an anti-e at all if ya dont have to.
 
SOLID said:
thinking 400mg of test 400-600mg of EQ Zyg, would aromasin be too much?
To be honest, Im not sure.
 
Use whichever you can afford and feel comfortable with.

Armidex and Femara do aggravated ones lipid profiles but if you keep the use of these compounds to a reasonable length of time and keep a fairly clean diet, you will be o.k.

Aromasin affects the lipid profiles much less than A and F but costs quite a bit and its not readily available as A and F are now.

My advice, experiment with all of them and come to your own conclusion to what works and feels better for you.
 
Canuck4 said:
The original Aromasin is around $6.50 per 25mg tab.
But theres also a Chinese generic version of Aromasin (Exemestane) for $3.50.

I just started the Chinese generic version of Aromasin (Exemestane), I was on 1 mg arimidex a day. Switched over immediately and have lost 5 pounds or so of water, feel pumped and tight as hell and strong.

good stuff
 
Nice :)
How much Exemestane were you using per day?


baby_bbol said:


I just started the Chinese generic version of Aromasin (Exemestane), I was on 1 mg arimidex a day. Switched over immediately and have lost 5 pounds or so of water, feel pumped and tight as hell and strong.

good stuff
 
I'll be using the QFS Letrozole on my next cycle. I here guys are getting away with using only one 2.5mg tab e3d.
 
i had a quick read on femara the other night (product reference) and saw some cancer stuff i didnt like too much, but i was in a hurry and dont quite remember

arimidex is expensive as hell though isnt it
 
Cheapest I've seen is $3.00 per tab for generic. It is more expensive in Canada than at USA compounders.
 
Read Fonz's posts on aromasin, the only anti-e that dosen't screw up your lipids!!! (very important for CV health and longevity)

Just get liqui-exemestane from PnP - affordable and it works - using right now 25mg EOD.

S
 
Not exactly a good endorsement, since it is illegal to do so. Aromasin is a prescription drug. We need to stop endorsing illegal means in our posts.
 
Huh? Steroids are illegal...


DrJMW said:
Not exactly a good endorsement, since it is illegal to do so. Aromasin is a prescription drug. We need to stop endorsing illegal means in our posts.
 
I thought it was o.k to endorse research companies that sold NO controlled substances??

What's the difference if I reccomend PnP or TLR (except that TLR sponsors elite)

I have read many endorsements of PnP in previous posts, thats why I put it up

If we are going to ban research company posts o.k - but lets make it uniform and not just a select few (and I am NOT part of PnP -they just have a good, reliable service that delivers quick!)

So Mods whats the deal??? Can we mention research companies or not; if not then make it a sticky and I apologize. If we can then $#$% you! DrJMW

S :confused:
 
supreme


i ordered the pnp aromasin as well but the payment thru western union damn ex.btw how good is the product for get rid of puffy nips when you already have them.
 
You should read the "Legal" articles written by the resident, Elite lawyers about research companies. What the owner and the mods allow to be posted on the boards is their business. My point: source posting of these "research companies" is not prudent.
 
O.k. I agree its all a gray area but untill they are banned by mods, or the FDA shuts them down people are going to use them. I would rather provide info on the reliable one's than not. Of course it is always at your own risk and any day the companies might have to close.

Although these research companoes have been around several years with no problems

S
 
I know of one that' had a small problem recently :D

supreme said:
O.k. I agree its all a gray area but untill they are banned by mods, or the FDA shuts them down people are going to use them. I would rather provide info on the reliable one's than not. Of course it is always at your own risk and any day the companies might have to close.

Although these research companoes have been around several years with no problems

S
 
Yeah, but if its LR, read the posts where they are cleared of the charges (or at least they say so) and their problem was not for research material it was for suppossed GHB, roids and recreational drugs.

I don't know what the final outcome on that was or is , but as far as I know (and I have no other info except the boards) no other research company has been shut down.

If you want more info ask Juice Authority - the man knows a lot !

S
 
SOLID said:
thinking 400mg of test 400-600mg of EQ Zyg, would aromasin be too much?
I'm not Zyglamail however the answer is yes.

You do not want to cut out all the estrogen production.
Aromasin will cut out nearly 100% of the estrogen produced
by the aromatase enzyme which is not the best thing
to do if optimum muscle gains are your goal.

By the way, what are you concerns?
Water bloat?..........Gyno?
 
supreme said:
I thought it was o.k to endorse research companies that sold NO controlled substances??

What's the difference if I reccomend PnP or TLR (except that TLR sponsors elite)

I have read many endorsements of PnP in previous posts, thats why I put it up

If we are going to ban research company posts o.k - but lets make it uniform and not just a select few (and I am NOT part of PnP -they just have a good, reliable service that delivers quick!)

So Mods whats the deal??? Can we mention research companies or not; if not then make it a sticky and I apologize. If we can then $#$% you! DrJMW

S :confused:

Please don't tell respected doctors on this board to fuck off. Dr JMW is a valuable contributor and should be treated with respect.

While source posting of research companies is intermittantly tolerated here, strictly speaking, I don't believe its allowed, and more relevant; no one likes it to be highlighted. Nothing wrong with Dr JMW's comment.
 
Stillgoing said:
Please don't tell respected doctors on this board to fuck off. Dr JMW is a valuable contributor and should be treated with respect.

While source posting of research companies is intermittantly tolerated here, strictly speaking, I don't believe its allowed, and more relevant; no one likes it to be highlighted. Nothing wrong with Dr JMW's comment.

Agreed! You could have got your point across without the @#$% off!

Mavy
 
Yeah , your're right I just had a bad day and I get sick of people confusing these research companies with real sources. I've been here long enough to know not to source post. I still feel it's o.k. to guide people to the research companies that provide good service until we ban that (actually that may not be a bad idea if we try to protect some of those companies before there gone) I guess I need to put more carbs in my diet some I'm not such ass late at night. I apologize

S
 
supreme said:
Yeah , your're right I just had a bad day and I get sick of people confusing these research companies with real sources. I've been here long enough to know not to source post. I still feel it's o.k. to guide people to the research companies that provide good service until we ban that (actually that may not be a bad idea if we try to protect some of those companies before there gone) I guess I need to put more carbs in my diet some I'm not such ass late at night. I apologize

S

This is the real point to be made here, Supreme. You have been around along time, and I'm sure you have noticed that when there is too much open discussion about something on the internet boards, it isn't long before LE takes an interest. Chinese GH is a perfect example. And the first companies to make the FDA/Customs automatic seizure list were the ones we talked about by name.
I am a big fan of the research company you mentioned, also. I don't want to lose them or any of the good companies as a resource. I wish the boards would treat them in the same way we treat sources.
This is especially true when "Fox News" is reading our posts. Bad idea, EF.
Of course you are right..... no ban as yet, probably because research companies sponser boards. Maybe we need to police ourselves a little.
This is no criticism......I've been as guilty as anyone in the past.
 
Top Bottom