GinNJuice said:I agree,
and if you were waiting to buy a house, this is a good time.
Doktor Bollix said:Greenspan should never have jacked it up so high when he was raising rates, it's too unpredictable and disruptive Someone once compared raising interest rates as a key lever:
"It is like pulling a brick across a table top with a piece of elastic : nothing happens for ages, and then the brick hits you in the eye."
One of the causes for the recession in the first place.
Fonz said:
A Lowered interest rate = Increased spending
Increased Spending = Economic Growth
I think Greenspan did the right thing. He's probably worried
about the whole stock market debacle, which could spiral
into other areas of the economy. If that happenned, people
would save instead of spend. Economic Growth would then
stagnate.
Fonz
I understand the rationale. My point was in hindsight raising rates was a bad call last couple of times he did it, not his fault it's just a very unwieldy instrument hence the elastic band/brick simile.Fonz said:
A Lowered interest rate = Increased spending
Increased Spending = Economic Growth
I think Greenspan did the right thing. He's probably worried
about the whole stock market debacle, which could spiral
into other areas of the economy. If that happenned, people
would save instead of spend. Economic Growth would then
stagnate.
Fonz
Fonz said:
A Lowered interest rate = Increased spending
Increased Spending = Economic Growth
I think Greenspan did the right thing. He's probably worried
about the whole stock market debacle, which could spiral
into other areas of the economy. If that happenned, people
would save instead of spend. Economic Growth would then
stagnate.
Fonz
The Nature Boy said:I'm waiting for the housing market to crash. Foreclosures are at an all time high.
The Nature Boy said:I'm waiting for the housing market to crash. Foreclosures are at an all time high.
VicTusDeuS said:
It will. Just wait till those low interest rates eventually rise up. People will loose money on their homes that they paid too much for in the first place.
FreakMonster said:
How will people lose money on their homes if their low interest rate they got is a 30 yr. fixed rate?
KHMER ROGUE said:Three words
Keynesian policy sucks.
spentagn said:
Greenspan is a monetarist.
FreakMonster said:
How will people lose money on their homes if their low interest rate they got is a 30 yr. fixed rate?
VicTusDeuS said:
The rates are so low now that it is a good time to take out that loan. Because it's such a good rate, everyone wants to do this. There are only so many homes and everyone knows now is the time to get a mortgage if you want a lower rate. Supply/demand drives up the prices of these homes and people are still willing to pay these inflated prices. When rates eventually go back up, the demand will drop and the price would even out some more. Plus, it seems like they give out mortgages to any piece of trash these days. Sooner or later these people will not be able to keep up with payments and the homes might get forclosed.
joncrane said:But when you're ready for a home, you're ready for a home.
JC
2EZ2BRICH said:So how would you answer the following:
1. when you purchase a home, are you buying an asset or liability ?
2. how does one know when they are ready to buy a home ? what is used or what should one use to gauge the situation.
3. are you still building equity with monthly payments if prices were to recede as interest rates increase ? if so, please explain.
I am new to this real estate stuff. i'm all ears.
Fonz said:
1. Liability.
2. When you have enough money.
3. Inconclusive.
If I were to buy a house, I would pay it off in 3-5 years.
Mortgages are extremely wasteful.
I'd rather live semi-frugally for 3-5 years than incurr a 20 year mortgage. Plus, the savings you'd generate would more than make up for the frugal part.
E.g.
Salary: $100,000
House: $350,000
Save up after 5 years: $350,000
Gives you a disposable income of $30,000/year NET
(500,000-350,000)/5
Buy it.
Now, you OWN an asset NOT a liability
(i.e you can RENT it.......more income)
AND,
the savings:
$350 000 Cost. Mortgage rate of 6%.
Amount paid approx after money down: $550,000
Net Loss: $200,000 (Now Savings)
See?
Mortagages are just a bad, bad choice.
Fonz
joncrane said:
Yes but you are negleting a person's marginal utility of money.
There are people that pay their mortgage payments and then carry credit card debt. To those people their utility for money is very high; they are willing to pay 19% interest.
You on the other hand are squeamish about even paying 6% for use of money today that you will pay back tomorrow.
There is no right or wrong; it is just personal preference.
I get the impression that you come from money--the way you talk about money and of course the impressive education you brag about.
To someone that doesn't have large savings, or prefers to enjoy their life a little more while they are young, a 30 year mortgage is great.
Another consideration is that no matter how thrifty or reckless you are, lenders apply the same general formula: debt payments cannot exceed 33% of gross monthly income. I am thrifty like you; I felt that I could have afforded more house and higher payments but the lenders didn't.
Oh and finally; when you purchase a home, you are purchasing an ASSET. You are still paying money down. If you were keeping a personal balance sheet you would have the amount of the MORTGAGE, which would be less than the value of the house, in the liabilities column. Your overall net worth actually goes down becaue of transfer costs.
JC
vinylgroover said:Firstly, the notion that there is a crash pending is nonsense in a low interest rate environment.
The first sign that the real estate market is going soft is that investors start leaving the market. Investors are interest rate sensitive, so while ever interest rates remain stable or are falling, investors will stay in the market and buy more.
Secondly, foreclosures are less likely to occur in a low interest rate environment, since housing affordibility is increased. Foreclosures will only occur if low interest rates are accompanied by a massive increase in unemployment. While ever, interest rates remain low, people's cpacity to repay is unaffected.
Thirdly, there is always anecdotal evidence of people losing money through property. However, this doesn't indicate a drop in values across the board is pending. rather, it's more likely a case that particular people made poor buying decisions and paid too much for their property in the first place.
Decreases in interest rates will always stimulate activity and demand in the housing market, because it is first home buyers who are most affected by a drop or increase in interest rates. Again, assuming there is not excess supply already in the market and unemployment is stable, any cut in rates will stimulate the housing market.
Whether you are ready to buy or not depends solely on your motivation for buying and your capacity to do so.
You should not be going on with less than 15-20% deposit. If you are buying for investment purposes, buy now, while interest rates are low to take advantage of the higher returns. Buy wisely, and look around.
Buy in areas which have good access to public transport, shops, schools, public facilties etc. Location is always the key.
Remember, property is a scarce commodity, land is in fixed supply therefore the underlying value of land will always increase, so if you don't buy now, you will only pay more for it in 3 or 5 or 7 years. There will always be booms and busts, but in the long term, you will always be ok with property.
Buying property is an asset not a liability. A liability is credit card debt or purchasing a motor vehicle on credit. Property is a commodity which will appreciate in value and should be treated as an asset.
Fonz said:
And a property an asset?
Again, check your accounting manual.
House Equity= Book Value House(Asset) - Total Mortgage left(Liability)
When you buy a house you get both an asset and a liability +
a long-term liability(interest).
Accounting 101 here people........ (kidding)
Fonz
spentagn said:
Actually, your long-term liability is composed of the net present value of all future cash flows, meaning principle and interest, discounted at the IR.
And property is an asset. Do simple ledger entries to figure it out.
Fonz said:
OK, Mr. Professorj/k
Explain to me the UK market then...........
And a property an asset?
Again, check your accounting manual.
House Equity= Book Value House(Asset) - Total Mortgage left(Liability)
When you buy a house you get both an asset and a liability +
a long-term liability(interest).
Accounting 101 here people........ (kidding)
Fonz
Valerie: I'd talk to him now. His overspending is going to come back and bite you in the ass.
valerie said:I was able to pay off our property early by paying additional towards the principle. It was a 15 year mortgage and I paid it off in 7years. Course prop is cheap in my area.
valerie said:Thanks for letting me vent. I had wanted to discuss this but as I read here how much the men dislike women I fiqured they'd think I'm a gold digger or a killjoy. I got my own money .-valerie
valerie said:I wish he would but he has no interest in the subject. He is not into education.
2EZ2BRICH said:o.k. now i am really lost here. like Fonz, i always considered a house to be a liability.
1. who owns the house when the purchase is made ?
so let's think about it a minute, why not start an investment portfolio over purchasing a home. seems that the investment portfolio is more likely to generate money for you quicker, than a new home will. instead of paying a $2000 mortgage every month, along with taxes and all the other utilites ...why not throw that money into an account. at least the account will be yours from day 1 and not the banks...Hmmm ?
hope my question is clear...it's late...hehe
2ez
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














