Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Feasability of making anabolics

Phreaky

New member
Theoreticaly speaking, would it be possible to manufature anabolics if one had university level chemisrty and access to a university lab? The reason I ask this is because there are apparently some generic orals floating around that have supposedly been made at a university. They look very similar to IP stuff but the pills are far more unifrom and solid. From several accounts this stuff is amazing: 50mg Winny and D-bol and 10mg Anavar. These guys are pumped! I just wanted to know if it is at all possible to actually synthesize these anabolics with univeristy level chem.???
 
I don't know but I do know you could purchase powder form which is cheap and then press it into pill form and make alot of cash. It would be espacially easy to sell stuff as IP's becasue it's a plain pill with no markings on it.
 
I've overheard some discussions about the Oxandrolone and how they make it. The most important ingredient is the powder they purchase from SPA Milano, Italy. To make the tabs or (in one case, the caps), you still need chemistry knowledge, but the real knowledge how to make the active compound is inside SPA.
I also read that one guy recently purchased 60 grams of Furazabol powder and plans to make 6000 tabs á 10mg of it.
But again, i only overheard that on the boards.
 
"With univeristy level chem" ??? I don't think so.... Even if you knew the basics and theory, it is not an area to play with. All AAS are serious drugs that play with your hormones, cells, etc. There is no room for any mistakes here. You just can't say: "Ooops, I put too much of this". I personally would never use something that was created in a college lab by someone with college chemistry knowledge. I also never use anything that is not coming from major pharmaceutical companies.
 
mrt said:
"With univeristy level chem" ??? I don't think so.... Even if you knew the basics and theory, it is not an area to play with. All AAS are serious drugs that play with your hormones, cells, etc. There is no room for any mistakes here. You just can't say: "Ooops, I put too much of this". I personally would never use something that was created in a college lab by someone with college chemistry knowledge. I also never use anything that is not coming from major pharmaceutical companies.

er.. dude, Pharmaceutical company's employ university educated bods, and Dan Duchaine had no formal training yet developed a couple of anabolic compunds (cannot remember which ones..)...

Is IP a chinese degree qualified chemist? Possibly...
 
GaryWary said:


er.. dude, Pharmaceutical company's employ university educated bods,

Of course they do, but they don't let them develop their own or copy others formulas and let them sell it once it's produced. If a major company develops a drug they test it for years, get licenses, permissions, etc. Who's going to give you any kind of guarantee that these backyard labs are doing them correctly, how can you tell they are sterile, how do you know they put correct indrigients? What will you do if you get fucked up by one these home made drugs???

I won't take those risks, I'll just pay a few bucks more and buy the legit stuff and make sure what I'm putting into my body.
 
mrt, you might wanna rethink your earlier statements, since most of the pro-hormones on the market are at best 90% pure, some only 80%. And don't try using the argument that pro-hormones are not as good as real steroids, since this is irrelevant, as it is still being ingested and the syntheses are similar.

As for backyard manufacture, I would think against it. Most of the easy to obtain steroids are not difficult to synthesize, but things like oxymetholone, oxandrolone, stanazolol become more complicated. And also getting caught would mean a nice time in jail, since you would not be able to argue personal use.

I would assume that most underground steroids are being purchased from Indian/Middle East and Chinese manufacturers.
 
cockdezl,

Could you please remind me my earlier statements? I can't recall anything I wrote about pro-hormones and their purity or anything on pro-hormone-steroid comparison. Maybe you are mistaking me with someone else?
 
mrt, there was no mistake:

<"With univeristy level chem" ??? I don't think so.... Even if you knew the basics and theory, it is not an area to play with. All AAS are serious drugs that play with your hormones, cells, etc. There is no room for any mistakes here. You just can't say: "Ooops, I put too much of this". I personally would never use something that was created in a college lab by someone with college chemistry knowledge. I also never use anything that is not coming from major pharmaceutical companies.>

Your post made the assumption that steroidal synthesis must be perfect and the end product must be extremely precise, since, as you stated, "..AAs are serious drugs that play with your hormones, cells, etc." This assumption that "there is no room for any mistakes" falls apart when you realize that most of the pro-hormone manufacturing (which are steroids, no matter how effective they are) fails to acheive a 90% purity. With a minimum of 10% impurities, there is yet to be any problems with the ingestion of these products. So technically there can be some error.
 
Top Bottom