Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Exorcist Beginning.....

AAP

Plat Hero
Platinum
Watched this today. Ho-Hum. The most interesting part was the beginning (no pun) where the battle had taken place and all the soldiers were hanging upside down on the cross. Damn that was a lot of dead bodies.

Funny thing, I knew exactly who was possessed the entire time. Don't know how I knew, but I knew it wasn't the little boy.

Other than that... it was disappointing. The previews of it were so much better.

Wish there was a great creepy horror movie out there that was REALLY scarey.
 
I thought you were talking about the beginning of Ex 1, with the statue of 'the beast'. Great scene....
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
I thought you were talking about the beginning of Ex 1, with the statue of 'the beast'. Great scene....


I don't remember that... describe what happens.
 
This movie is upper crap

Japanese and koreans made good scary horror movies

Hollywood no longer do (cause if they are too scary/violent they wouldn't sell to a large audience and make huge $)
 
HEre is a question regarding Exorcist Beginning..

Ok, why the fuck didn't the demon just kill the second priest? It killed the first one? Why was she just trying to (?)deceive(?) him? For what gain? The demon had already accomplished it's goal which was a river of blood by making everyone in the camp kill one another. Why did she need the little boy? Why didn't she just push the priest over some rocks or something? What did she need to toy around with him for?
 
AAP said:
I don't remember that... describe what happens.
Basicly, Father Merrin (Max von Sydow) meets the Devil as a Babylonian stone effigy on an archaeological dig in the desert, for the first time.
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
Basicly, Father Merrin (Max von Sydow) meets the Devil as a Babylonian stone effigy on an archaeological dig in the desert, for the first time.


are we talking about the same movie?
 
strangebrew said:
He's talking about the original.


ok, because this movie was about the archealogical dig and stuff.

I must not have seen the original beginning. What happens there to make it great?
 
AAP said:
ok, because this movie was about the archealogical dig and stuff.

I must not have seen the original beginning. What happens there to make it great?

I don't really remember the movie that well. I laughed a lot.
 
AAP said:
are we talking about the same movie?
No, I was talking about the first one. It's a great movie. The other 2 sucked. Haven't seen the new one...
 
Ulcasterdropout said:
No, I was talking about the first one. It's a great movie. The other 2 sucked. Haven't seen the new one...


what happened in that scene to make it so great?
 
AAP said:
what happened in that scene to make it so great?
was just great...see it, and you'll know why after - symbolism and foreshadowing. I don't want to ruin it.
 
the original from 73 or the remake of the original last year?
 
Top Bottom