Exercise related math problem

[BrothaBill]

observer affects the observed reality

Exactly!!! More intelligent life, Ive struck a goldmine here!! Yes that is exactly what Im saying, you can never observe the truth based on quantum theory, just the probability of where it was. The act of observing it changes it!!! Its just that simple!! Awesome!!

MAGE CHAOS (ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT!! NO LONGER A SEEKER OF LIGHT!!)

 

[Moderate_THIS]

Wasn't there an experiment done demonstrating how the behavior of a beam of electrons changed when people "watched" it?

 

[tripleblonde]

Exactly!!! More intelligent life, Ive struck a goldmine here!! Yes that is exactly what Im saying, you can never observe the truth based on quantum theory, just the probability of where it was. The act of observing it changes it!!! Its just that simple!! Awesome!!

MAGE CHAOS (ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT!! NO LONGER A SEEKER OF LIGHT!!)

wow brothabill.....you are so hot to me right now

 

[BrothaBill]

cartesian logic - interesting stuff... so are you more into physics or philosophy, or both? all things as you say do converge at some point...

yes it is true, I may be talking to myself and infact may have invented you and everything else as a device of my consciousness to entertain me, I thought of that one back in the day at the ripe age of 18, however you can never prove it either way/right or wrong and thus it is only thoery and philosophy and will never become science....

and also yes the only answer you need to know is one b/c it is all what you believe is true too, because what you believe is reality (regardless of whether you are divergent or not)

which brings me to my next point... genius breeds insanity... I rack up quite a few points on the IQ scale myself... but what does genius really buy you?

Exactly, that is what Im saying and at some point everyone thinks it at some point, see the answer is within you, always has been, infinite thoughts all must be true for a theory to be correct. That is what Im saying and what does it buy me?? The ability to move between wave and particle worlds, I have figured out a way using Physics, changed the rules... I SPEAK THE TRUTh... I have found a way... Believe if you want or dont believe me it doesnt matter... that is what Im saying. But I have... YOU see everything you believe has been what someone has told you, your reality is based on that.. WHat I am saying is this is just another lesson and "I" just another professor and this is reality. You see if you believe it, then it is true... its that simple, that is what I am saying. I am light and a zen master and I have alot of knowledge and I can do some Freaky shite... I kid you not.

BrothaBill (Zen master of the Light)

 

[Fonz]

Exactly, Fonz gets it!@! But how do you know nobody ever put a cat inside a cage with a radioactive isotope???

See it doesnt matter if Fonz believes they didnt, then they didnt, but what if they did??? How could you disprove we have secret labs going on all the time, its just not observed in reality, but who knows? That is what Im saying!!!

FONZ (ANOTHER ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT)

LOL...the theory held that once the radioactive isotope began to decay the cat would be both dead and alive at the same time. Just a concept of Quantum Mechanics(simple).

We now know that it is impossible to measure any object precisely(say with precision (deltaX)), and attempt a simultaneous momentum measurement made under precision(delta(p)), then the product of these 2 uncertainties cannot be smaller than the number of the order of h(Planck's constant)

(delta(X)) * (delta(p)) => h (Plancks constant)

This is referred to as Schroedingers' Uncertainty Principle.

To give you a reference point of the smallest possible source of error, just set the left side equal to the right side, so:

Smallest error

= h = 6.634 * 10 exp (-26) or 0.00000000000000000000000006634

Of course errors such as this almost never happen, they are much larger.

If by some miracle we would be able to construct a device that could measure the error below the (h) tolerance gradient, we would be able to actually measure the electron orbits in the electron cloud to a precision that is unheard off.

Some of my professors are working in this field. Quantum Chrmodynamics and Quantum Electrodynamics.

 

[BrothaBill]

Wasn't there an experiment done demonstrating how the behavior of a beam of electrons changed when people "watched" it?

Yes, YEs, that is the beginning of your journey... Its that simple>>>

Yes, but it doesnt have to be done in a Lab, you can do it at home. Heres how...

Turn off your lights in your house and then stare and a static TV and soon your mind will see patterns and then you can influence what you see on the screen with thought and see what you want when you get relaxed enough and let tension go... YOU see...

You are changing electrons by staring at the TV screen b/c vision is just a reflection of light bounced off what you are looking at... IN this case, the electrons flowing on the screen.... FUcking awesome my man, Ive done this early on in my research... That by thought you are actually influencing those electrons, you see VISION is a two way street...

BrothaBIll (ZEN MASTER OF THE LIGHT)

 

[BrothaBill]

wow brothabill.....you are so hot to me right now

Most Excellent Triple Blonde, that is the only answer that is important to BrothaBill!!! hahaha!!! Excellent now you get it too!!

Tripleblonde (truly a ZEN MASTER OF LIGHT AND...BEAUTY!)

 

[BrothaBill]

LOL...the theory held that once the radioactive isotope began to decay the cat would be both dead and alive at the same time. Just a concept of Quantum Mechanics(simple).

We now know that it is impossible to measure any object precisely(say with precision (deltaX)), and attempt a simultaneous momentum measurement made under precision(delta(p)), then the product of these 2 uncertainties cannot be smaller than the number of the order of h(Planck's constant)

(delta(X)) * (delta(p)) => h (Plancks constant)

This is referred to as Schroedingers' Uncertainty Principle.

To give you a reference point of the smallest possible source of error, just set the left side equal to the right side, so:

Smallest error

= h = 6.634 * 10 exp (-26) or 0.00000000000000000000000006634

Of course errors such as this almost never happen, they are much larger.

If by some miracle we would be able to construct a device that could measure the error below the (h) tolerance gradient, we would be able to actually measure the electron orbits in the electron cloud to a precision that is unheard off.

Some of my professors are working in this field. Quantum Chrmodynamics and Quantum Electrodynamics.

aCADEMIC mASTURBATION... Sorry to say, I ve already done it and more.. Created magentic fields with thought. WEll past all known knowledge... Believe me, I came from a different reality and jumped into this one. Ill be leaving shortly..

 

[Fonz]

I'll get my brother online, he's doing his Ph.D in Super-string theories, and Supergravity theories. Basically UFT's.

 

[Becoming]

Schroedingres cat is a hypothetical mental excercise. Nobody ever put a cat inside a cage with a radioactive isotope.

sorry, I misquoted... I read an article about an experiment based on the hypothetical of schoredingre's cat where they theorized teleporting single particles (I don't remember what kind) was possible, but really it was just a manifestation of the observation criteria or somethig like that...

it was quite a few years ago I read that...