Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Exactly how do Cops get away with doing Steroids???

Randy_Spears

New member
I know Ronnie Coleman was a Cop, but how on earth did he take roids without raising an eyebrow with the police department??? Theres lots of big and ripped cops also it seems, Im sure they are on gear also. Do police departments just not care that cops do drugs, as long as they dont do marijuana, cocaine, etc.?
 
Last edited:
Ronnie is all natural !! What are you talking about?
 
Begin03_LG.jpg


See.....
 
They don't get tested for steroids.

Very few labs carry the kits to test for steroids and it's expensive, around 400 bones (US dollars).
 
You lost me, Code.

Isn't that Ronnie Coleman, the current Mr. Olympia? I googled "Ronald Coleman" up and it's the same person. I assume you are referring to Ron Coleman?
 
KHMER ROGUE said:
You lost me, Code.

Isn't that Ronnie Coleman, the current Mr. Olympia? I googled "Ronald Coleman" up and it's the same person. I assume you are referring to Ron Coleman?

naw, there is another Ron Coleman in the IFBB. And that's him.

The Mr. O Ronnie hates this dude with a passion. Or so I've read. I don't know either of them.
 
well dunno but how do Ted Kennedy get away with murdering someone ? How did Chenney and Bush manage with Enron ?.....
 
Yeah, I"m pretty sure thats Coleman in the first pic, but it was from awhile ago. He's grown quite a bit since then. Last I heard he was still a cop. Imagine getting pulled over by him? I'm sure the rest of the force love the guy, and don't give a shit that he is roided out. He's great for publicity.


Coleman11.jpg
 
Haz said:
Yeah, I"m pretty sure thats Coleman in the first pic, but it was from awhile ago. He's grown quite a bit since then. Last I heard he was still a cop. Imagine getting pulled over by him? I'm sure the rest of the force love the guy, and don't give a shit that he is roided out. He's great for publicity.


Coleman11.jpg

Ron Coleman retired from the police force two years ago.

That pic isn't the Mr. O Ronnie, it's the other ROn Coleman in the IFBB. Seriously, Flex had a big write-up about the two of them a while back.
 
Code, are you sure they are different guys? If they are, they could be twins. The Mr. O ronnie used to have his hair like that as well, if I remember correctly. And the mustache is very coplike. I'd swear its him.
 
Haz said:
Code, are you sure they are different guys? If they are, they could be twins. The Mr. O ronnie used to have his hair like that as well, if I remember correctly. And the mustache is very coplike. I'd swear its him.

No, not 100% sure.
The pic of that "Ronnie" has him pretty skinny and lean. Which is how the "other" Ronnie looked in the Flex magazine.

But that pic is from like 1972 or something, so it could be Lee Haney... :)
 
I'm sure Ronnie has scripts for pretty much everything he takes. He just takes way more than the scripts call for.
 
That pic was Ronnie Coleman.

Ronnie Coleman competed for years with ony mild success before deciding to hit the drugs in earnest.

Ronald Coleman only ever competed at amateur level as a light heavy, and has competed at the world champs a few times.

Have a look at his chest and traps in that pic in particular very distinctive, that's Ronnie Coleamn without question.
 
How do cops get away with doing steroids?

In the country that I live in, mere possession of steroids IS NOT a criminal offence. You can only be charged for importing/exporting or dealing them. So.... if a cop here has a domestic source and doesn't deal, he can sauce to his heart's content and his agency can't do fuck all about it... he's doing nothing illegal. The only problem he may encounter is if the behavioral effects of steroids begin to complicate things with his duties(aggression, etc), then he may be taken to task for his ACTIONS, but NOT what is in his blood or urine.
 
SCOTTY-TWO-HOTTY said:
In the country that I live in, mere possession of steroids IS NOT a criminal offence.

Sorry Bro but that is not true, steroids are just as illegal here as they are in the states.
 
To my knowledge Canada does allow for possesion of a small ammount for personal use. Unless something has changed that i am unaware of?
 
Ingram said:


Sorry Bro but that is not true, steroids are just as illegal here as they are in the states.

The only illegal in Canada re: steroids is the sale, export/import and possesion with intent to sell.

Personal use/posession is allowed.
 
Legal steroid possesion in Canada is just some dumb internet rumor. If anyone cares to disagrees grab a handfull of dbol and a few amps of sust and head on down to the police station... When you get there slap it all down on the table and ask 'What do you think of this?'

If anyone is interested in doing this please let me know how it turns out. :D
 
Ingram said:


Sorry Bro but that is not true, steroids are just as illegal here as they are in the states.

Ingram- No flame intended Bro, but you're wrong. Its not even close to being congruent with U.S. law. Its written plain-as-day on the first page of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. Get yourself a copy of the Canadian Criminal Code, go to the CDSA at the rear of the Code and see for yourself. It reads "...simple possession of a Schedule IV substance is not an offence." If you read further into that Act, in the punishment sections, you will see that the only drugs you can be charged with simple possession are Schedule I, II, and III substances... no such charge exists for Schedule IV drugs. Schedule IV is only an issue in the importing/exporting and trafficking Sections.
 
A fellow Contrarian goes down in flames.

I'll mourn you 'til I join you Nugga!!
 
Ok but where is the part where it says Steroids are Schedule IV?
My understanding is that they are Schedule III.
 
supernav said:
I agree. Unless someone knows differnet, all police forces across North America have a strict NO-DRUG policy, and that includes marijuana. Being in charge of a gun while high on a pot or speed or a roid rage syndrome is a danger to the public and a liability.

that's why you rarely see huge buff cops, even though they all have gyms and are ENCOURAGED to work out and not be donut eating puffballs. :)

-= nav =-

You'd have to produce such a policy for me to believe one even exists. "Criminal activity" is what cops must refrain from(in any "internal" policy) and like I said... up here, its not a crime to be on steroids.
 
Ingram said:
Ok but where is the part where it says Steroids are Schedule IV?
My understanding is that they are Schedule III.

Nope. I've got it right in front of me... every damn steroid that ever existed is manifested in alphabetical order under Schedule IV.
 
SCOTTY-TWO-HOTTY said:
Nope. I've got it right in front of me... every damn steroid that ever existed is manifested in alphabetical order under Schedule IV.

Ok cool, I just found that list on the net.

So you're saying f I went into a police station to show off my collection of steroids they couldn't do anything?
 
Ingram said:


Ok cool, I just found that list on the net.

So you're saying f I went into a police station to show off my collection of steroids they couldn't do anything?

Well if your collection was a 1000 ampules of sust, then you are fucked as that is NOT looked upon as personal posession.
 
Ingram said:


Ok cool, I just found that list on the net.

So you're saying f I went into a police station to show off my collection of steroids they couldn't do anything?

They'd seize them from you, as they are a "controlled substance" and you have no script. However, you can not be charged with ANY offence.
 
supernav said:
Besides...there's NOTHING to stop them from charging you and it's YOU who sitll has to show up in court and get a lawyer to prove you're not guilty.
-= nav =-

This statement of yours is indicitive of how little you know, not only about Canadian Criminal Law, but U.S. law too. The laws of both our countries are built upon the premise that the ONUS is on the Crown(in Canada)and the D.A.(in the States)to prove guilt It is the prosecution who must put forth the evidence and try and make a conviction. The defence doesn't have to prove you're NOT guilty, its the prosecution who has to prove you ARE.

For example... lets say Ingram went into a local RCMP Detachment and threw down 12 Sustenon Amps and 100 D-ball tabs. The desk guy says to the other cops at the station "Holy shit guys, there's a lot of steroids here.... enough for a whole football team!" Ingram is subsequently charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking a Schedule IV substance. So he goes to court (w/o a lawyer)... its the Crown Prosecutor who has to provide the court with an "expert witness"(A VERY experienced drug officer) to take the stand and tell the Judge how 12 amps of Sus and 100tabs of D-ball is what he considers "dealer quantities". Ingram doesn't have to prove his innocence, the Crown has to prove his guilt. In this case, no expert would testify to such amounts as dealer quanities, the charge would be pulled before the Judge was even seated, and Ingram would walk out of court with out having said a word the entire time he was there. He would have lost his gear, that's all.

WTF is it you're trying to prove with that Georgia situation? I've already stated that steroids are a controlled substance here... so the sale of them is called dealing, and dealing is illegal.

Nav- Bring something heavier next time.
 
The first pic is just an old pic of Ronnie Coleman, pre-shit-loads-of gear-and-gh. Ronnie used to be one of the thinner pros, till he started filling out around 1995.

Ron Coleman looks waaaay better IMO than Ronnie does. They both competed against each other years ago in some natural contest, probably the Team Universe.
 
supernav said:
>who must put forth the evidence and try and make a conviction

ah yes...the dream. :)

what it says on paper is NOT always how it works in life my friend.

-= nav =-

I agree... the law "theoretically" is not always how it is practiced "empirically".

However, I originally posted in this thread to answer the question of "How cops get away with taking steroids?" and I answered it with respect to Canadian cops. Someone with no criminal record would not spend any time on the"inside" before their court date for mere possession of steroids.

Peace,
S.
 
SCOTTY-TWO-HOTTY said:


I agree... the law "theoretically" is not always how it is practiced "empirically".

However, I originally posted in this thread to answer the question of "How cops get away with taking steroids?" and I answered it with respect to Canadian cops. Someone with no criminal record would not spend any time on the"inside" before their court date for mere possession of steroids.

Peace,
S.

A total of 8 quotation marks.
DO you make those annoying "finger movements" in person when saying something you feel needs quotation marks?
 
Code said:


A total of 8 quotation marks.
DO you make those annoying "finger movements" in person when saying something you feel needs quotation marks?

No... but I guess that's how it would seem after reading that piece. I REALLY enjoy using quotes when I post though.
 
Top Bottom