Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
EQUIPOISE vs. PRIMOBOLAN
- Thread starter awms
- Start date
These 2 are very safe, low to mild sides...the major difference is the cost..
I've used both each apart from each other on 2 seperate occasions, gains were very good, recovered nicely afterwards, but cost was the downfall. I doubt i will opt for Primo again just because of the price.
Another side note: these both need to be ran for a minimum of 12 weeks, I've run EQ at 400mg first time, and 900mg the second time with very few sides. Primo I've run at 400mg both times and probably should have ran it at 600mg, but one time was for precontest, other was with dbol/test. These 2 are very universal and can be used for any situation..
I've used both each apart from each other on 2 seperate occasions, gains were very good, recovered nicely afterwards, but cost was the downfall. I doubt i will opt for Primo again just because of the price.
Another side note: these both need to be ran for a minimum of 12 weeks, I've run EQ at 400mg first time, and 900mg the second time with very few sides. Primo I've run at 400mg both times and probably should have ran it at 600mg, but one time was for precontest, other was with dbol/test. These 2 are very universal and can be used for any situation..
sparetire
New member
Ran them both. Eq - 12 weeks at 500mgs and primo 200 a week (every 6 days actually) for 5 weeks - both seperate occasions. Eq, I had sleep problems, low bloat, i gained about 10-15 pounds of good mass, took 3 months for the old guys to come back. I ran primo for 5 weeks , low bloat and gained 10 pounds, recovered under 2 months, kept all of it. Primo in my opinion is the best by far 
missionpossible
New member
sparetire said:Ran them both. Eq - 12 weeks at 500mgs and primo 200 a week (every 6 days actually) for 5 weeks - both seperate occasions. Eq, I had sleep problems, low bloat, i gained about 10-15 pounds of good mass, took 3 months for the old guys to come back. I ran primo for 5 weeks , low bloat and gained 10 pounds, recovered under 2 months, kept all of it. Primo in my opinion is the best by far
Did you run test with your EQ on the cycle mentioned?
in my opinion i think equi is a bit stronger than primo so it takes a higher dose of primo to match up with equi. equi. will increase your appitite and does require a high calorie diet for maximum results. Primo doesnt seem to effect appitite one way or the other and does not require a high calorie diet for optimum results. SO primo would def. be a better choice for cutting up and equi. would be better for strength and weight gain.
Beachboy6294
New member
I like EQ but if money isn't a problem I would always use Primo instead! I like to run EQ at least 16 weeks too!
Beachboy6294
New member
awms said:
I would run the EQ at 750mgs a week for 12-16 weeks.
LVTitan
New member
i love them both. primo at 400-600mg/week for 10 weeks is a killer cycle.
i am currently on a 15-20week eq cycle at 400mg/week, with 10-15weeks of deca added in at 400mg also.
they are two different compounds with two different results.
do a cycle of each and see which one you prefer. if cost is no option, the primo would be the better cycle. THERE IS A REASON IT COSTS MORE !!
i am currently on a 15-20week eq cycle at 400mg/week, with 10-15weeks of deca added in at 400mg also.
they are two different compounds with two different results.
do a cycle of each and see which one you prefer. if cost is no option, the primo would be the better cycle. THERE IS A REASON IT COSTS MORE !!
krishna
New member
I don't see any reason to spend that much money on primo when both compounds yield similar results. I tend to think it's because primo is a derivative of DHB (dihydroboldenone--the reduced from of eq). So basically, primo comes from eq and they are similar compounds, hence the similar results, sides, etc. Go with eq!
If money was no option I'd def run the Primo, Loved the results I had from the one time I used it. I have also used EQ at up to 800 mgs a week a liked that as well. Major difference is the EQ gave me more anxiety. Maybe Primo would at that dose as well tho?
i can get a killer deal! i have an amzing hook up so i can get my shit alot cheaper then most people. so i think i may go with primo. i have read that primo is better then eq it is like deca but with out the water gain and side effects. also you keep most of ur gains once you are off which is what i am looking for! i dont see the sens of spending a shit load of money to be big for 12 weeks then loose it all.
LVTitan
New member
actually krish, eq is a derivitive of test, it's actually the exact same molecule as dbol, without the alpha alkylation at the 17th carbon ....krishna said:
and primo is a DHT based molecule.
DHB is what you get once the 5alpha reductase enzyme metabolizes eq, which is a very small percentage in humans. most eq is metabolized by the 5beta reductase to 5beta dihydroboldenone, which makes it mostly anabolic as opposed to an androgen
iHulk
New member
Makavelli said:
just want to throw in my 2 cents. Currently I'm on 700 mg/wk of primo and so far its been absolutley what I've been looking for. Slow, moderate, lean mutha fucking gains. No shutdown, no acne, libido is sky rocketed, awesome pumps. In my opinion, 600 mg may be the min to see good results. I'm thinking of stepping it up to a G a week.
At the same dosages of deca or Sus I was blowing up too quick and was hard to retain. I should also throw in that like Mak I do 2 sets of Cardio/day and eat almost perfectly. I'm lean all year around.
(I'm adding 50mg ED Winny for final 5 weeks)
PRIMO, in my opinion (as was Arnold's) is some of the best shit on the market.
Similar threads
