Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

EQ vs. SYNTHOL

diesel250

New member
BOTH ARE OIL AND EQ DOSENT HURT...WHICH LEADS ME TO THINK THAT IT WOULD BE BETTER TO USE EQ THAN SYNTHOL BECAUSE AT LEAST EQ HAS AN ANABOLIC AFFECT ALSO


I WOULD LOVE SOME FEED BACK
AND PLEASE NO SYNTHOL BASHING I HEARD IT ON THE OTHER POSTS ALREADY-----THANX GUYS:confused:
 
I am having trouble understanding what you are really stating. Remeber that synthol has NO anabolic properties at all. None. It's used strictly for lagging body parts on advanced lifters. It will do nothig for a rookie. A complete waste of time and health. Not bashing just the truth.

Now for the EQ, this is an anabolic and in a completly different class from sythol, the 2 should not even be listed together. With eq you will need to plan a diet and trining scheme as well as an injection schedule taking into account duration of intake and bringing you HPTA back on line. Totally different compounds.

Decide which to use based on you goals, current fitness level and development. Do more research and decide for yourself.



Sincerely :nopity:
 
please read---eq vs synthol

you guys must think im a complete idiot---or you misunderstood me entirely--
i thought i wouldent have to spell it out step by step
but i guess i have to

I MEANT if I was trying to bring up a lagging body part such as bi's
and i chose to use synthol wouldent it be a better idea to use eq because #1--it dosent hurt a bit #2oil is oil and i might as well use something anabolic than jut plain oil.
Ive been lifting for 6 yrs and i look damm good except my bi's could use another inch or 2 (whos couldent though)
i just want some good advice hopfully i am clear now
 
Come on. Back the fuck off this guy.
That was a reasonable and logical question.
He was asking "Why use something inert to expand the muscle when you could kill two birds with one stone and get an anabolic effect too?".
 
Not a bad question at all!! Synthol will last longer because it doesnt break down as fast, but you will lose most if not all your gains.
Eq, will work for what you are wanting. It depends on what type you use. If you want to do sight injection, which that is obvious, then use a 50mg/ml. That way you will have the opportunity to put more oil more frequently in the specific muscle. It would be a waste to inject a 200mg/ml ed or eod. Well, not a waste but you get the idea.
I prefer the eq because like you said it is anabolic and therefore you will retain your gains. By injecting it, you will be able to expand the mucsle fascia with the oil while building it.
To answer your question..both work. One works faster and you wont keep your gains as easy. The other works a little slower(but works) and you will gain muscle mass and retain you gains.
 
thanks alot guys ---and to ryvor--your a fucking faggot
why dont u come down from your iglue so i can kick your skinny ass all over nyc


once again thanks 4 the info
 
Personally, there aren't many AS that I wouldn't do....saying that, the three that I wouldn't ever do are synthol, insulin, and DNP. All three of these have the potential to kill you if misused, even one time! But that's just my opinion....I know many people that have used them and gotten tremendous results. Just too risky for me bro.
 
Mudvayne said:
Personally, there aren't many AS that I wouldn't do....saying that, the three that I wouldn't ever do are synthol, insulin, and DNP. All three of these have the potential to kill you if misused, even one time! But that's just my opinion....I know many people that have used them and gotten tremendous results. Just too risky for me bro.

None of those are AS.
 
I would do eq or another fast acting steroid for site injections. In my opion I think synthol is garbage, a big waste of money, and a serious health risk.
 
Top Bottom