I didn't know the article was written before 1-test came out. Hell, I don't even know when 1-test did come out, LOL. It makes sense that the name was chosen as a marketing ploy though; sounds like something they would do.DeepZenPill said:
I'm sure the article was written way before 1-test was released on the "pro-steroid" market. The 1-test name was basically chosen as a marketing strategy to associate it with testosterone.
And the fact that dihydroboldenone is a stronger androgen than boldenone is irrelevant. People take EQ because it is a mild androgen and a great anabolic. Being more androgenic doesn't necessarily mean "better."
I know that stronger androgen doesn't necessarily mean better. I was kind of jerking the chain of all the 1-test haters, LOL.
I have heard a couple people now report sexual dysfunction when taking 1-test. I find that very interesting given the androgenic nature (reportedly twice as androgenic as test). It makes me wonder if the problems a few people are having on EQ may be due to the small quantities of 1-test being created via 5-AR reduction of boldenone. Food for thought......
Can anyone tell me how anabolic EQ is in comparison to test? Is it more or less anabolic than test and by how much?