Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Down the Tubes with Dubya

I really don't understand this love for Clinton..it boggles my mind. The guy will go down as one of the worst Presidents in history.
 
strong island said:


What did I tell you about making a fool of yourself?? Go buy an economics textbook..please.

Is this James Carville???

I notice that you resort continually to ad hominem attacks. How about staying with the facts? YOu've been asked several times to back up your claims but you keep ignoring the requests.
 
Hengst said:


America is in deep shit with this ignorant ass at the helm and the people he has around him..... Carl Rove??? for crying out loud.

Co-President of the United States of America, Mr. Carl Rove:

ap_rove_020118_nh.jpg
 
Hengst said:
and there is a DIRECT coorelation between the tax cut and the budget deficiet. America was in the black until the tax cut. Bush is an ass hole.

I get soooooooo angry whern I think about the lies and manipulation he employed to get elected. And I do not mean Florida, but the lies and manipulation he told the american public.......and the fact that so many of them believed him.

America is in deep shit with this ignorant ass at the helm and the people he has around him..... Carl Rove??? for crying out loud.

You are an idiot. I will not go into it because you obviously cannot comprehend...but get some help.
 
strong island said:


The bottom line is that we DEALT with Libya and Kadhafi has been in hiding being a good boy ever since.

But Bin Laden was not affected whatsoever by Clinton.

last I heard, Libya was still considered to be a haven for terrorists.
 
a large part of this "war" can be located during reagan's *brilliant* star wars era.

nothing like a country trying to annex you with your own technology.
 
seems like the liberals on this thread think that:

1. Clinton had all good intentions and is the sole one to credit for the economy during his tenure

2. Bush took office and it was his fault that the economy turned bad

3. Everything that Bush does is to cover something up or to distract from something else. Nothing he does is to actually make peace or to defeat the terrorists.

4. Everything that Clinton does is to further the good of the country and he had all pure good intentions. Just ignore all the foreign policy blunders that led to 9/11.

GUESS WHAT CHUMPS YOU ALL ARE WRONG! KEEP DREAMING! HAVE A GOOD DAY!
 
COL KURTZ said:
seems like the liberals on this thread think that:

1. Clinton had all good intentions and is the sole one to credit for the economy during his tenure

2. Bush took office and it was his fault that the economy turned bad

3. Everything that Bush does is to cover something up or to distract from something else. Nothing he does is to actually make peace or to defeat the terrorists.

4. Everything that Clinton does is to further the good of the country and he had all pure good intentions. Just ignore all the foreign policy blunders that led to 9/11.

GUESS WHAT CHUMPS YOU ALL ARE WRONG! KEEP DREAMING! HAVE A GOOD DAY!

I'm a liberal. I posted on this thread. I would love to know how you came to these conclusions, especially since I said quite clearly that I'm disinterested in origins but how the administration responds. I think you've engaged in straw-man argumentation.
 
Jeezx I am glad the right-wing fuckwits on this page are over in the US where they can't influence European social policy. We like our social democracy just fine here, thanks. (And anyone who doesn't know the difference between socialist and social democracy, I suggest studying Russian history c. 1900-1920, you should find it enlightening).

circusgirl
 
Top Bottom