Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Dissent in Hollywood: Crash over Brokeback = Gay Agenda Setback

Status
Not open for further replies.
It would be very disingenuous to say that you are unaware of these statistical studies as they are very widely known in the homosexual community and have been for a considerable period of time.Many homosexual men have professed deep concern in regard to these statistics .Studies from the USA , Europe and the UK have come to similar conclusions and are widely accessible to the general public, at the click of a button .Of course, some will claim that independent world wide studies have no firm foundation or substance to them.That is to be expected.Even when this does stretch credulity .I wouldn't expect them to admit on this forum that i am right. Even when they absolutely know that what i am saying is, right and true. Its unimportant .The information is disturbing .I will not make further reference to it. Its too important to be bounced around lightly.Do your own research.The truth is there, for all that see.
 
So far, Longhorn fails to give evidence and a definition of this gay agenda he keeps obsessing over.

And tanka has yet to post a link citing those claims he made a few posts back or anything else to support his laughable statements.

Pretty plain to see how insecurities really trip people up when they fail to think things through.
 
Longhorn85 said:
Thanks Superdave. B'mom, many people feel that what is under attack is the traditional family. To recognize and point out that Hollywood has a homosexual agenda is not the same as homophobia.

That's akin to calling someone a racist simply because he points out that there is excessive crime in the ghetto.

For the record I've not seen this movie (or any other movie that didn't have a G or PG rating and was not suitable for viewing w/my kids in a very long time).

I have no comments/opinions about Hollywood or any gay agenda or anything else of that sort. I only got annoyed with the bible-thumping hate-mongers and felt the need to voice my views about them.

If someone is not gay that they need not worry about "traditional families". I am hetero and I will be involved with other hetero men. I have had children already so I dont understand why if someone is not personally affected by some one that is gay ( for example, is this gay person pointing a gun at me demanding my money) I dont see how someone's sexuality is going to affect me.

I dont understand your arguement about traditional families being endangered.

Not trying to be rude or a weisenheimer. I just honestly dont understand why someone's sexual preference endangers anyone else.
 
tanka said:
It would be very disingenuous to say that you are unaware of these statistical studies as they are very widely known in the homosexual community and have been for a considerable period of time.Many homosexual men have professed deep concern in regard to these statistics .Studies from the USA , Europe and the UK have come to similar conclusions and are widely accessible to the general public, at the click of a button .Of course, some will claim that independent world wide studies have no firm foundation or substance to them.That is to be expected.Even when this does stretch credulity .I wouldn't expect them to admit on this forum that i am right. Even when they absolutely know that what i am saying is, right and true. Its unimportant .The information is disturbing .I will not make further reference to it. Its too important to be bounced around lightly.Do your own research.The truth is there, for all that see.


The truth is out there because I say it is. I am not going to tell you where to find it because it is "tooooooooooo important." Dont believe me? Just ask me and I will tell you!

EXCELLENT POST! :worried:
 
I am still waiting for an explanation of exactly what this so called gay/homosexual agenda that Hollywood has is defined upon.
 
AAP said:
I am still waiting for an explanation of exactly what this so called gay/homosexual agenda that Hollywood has is defined upon.
I don't see it, conservative estimates put homosexuals at 10% of the population....10% of movies and television series aren't gay oriented. Funny thing, throughout most of western history homosexuality hasn't been considered "deviant" behavior. It only became "deviant" with the rise of Christianity and the Catholics have had some, generally accepted by historians, "deviant" popes.
 
AAP said:
Understanding is not exhibited by friviolous claims that Hollywood made a statement regarding the gay agenda by picking Crash over Brokeback Mountain. That is not understanding, that is attempting to justify own insecurities. The Oscars have always been about simply the Best in each category based on criteria and artistic skill. Not imaginary political underthemes. :rolleyes:

The point of this thread is that those who want to push the Gay Agenda (i.e., the normalization of homosexuality in America) were disappointed that Brokeback Mountain did not win the Academy Award for best picture and it has caused dissent in Hollywood circles. Do you dispute that?

Again, I think most would agree that the outcome of the Oscars has been affected by agendas (political and otherwise) more than once in the past.

I don't think those statements (observations, really), make me a homophobe.
 
Exactly. But I honestly want to know how this illogical conclusion that Gay Agenda Setback occured based on a damn movie not winning Best Picture. Hell, if you look at it with such a narrow mind like that, it can be argued that the Gay Agenda Advances Forward with 6 Oscars won that night.

Just another conservative desperately trying to label society in order to calm his own insecurities down. Geez, they make meds for this you know.
 
Longhorn85 said:
The point of this thread is that those who want to push the Gay Agenda (i.e., the normalization of homosexuality in America) were disappointed that Brokeback Mountain did not win the Academy Award for best picture and it has caused dissent in Hollywood circles. Do you dispute that?

.

I certainly do. Do you have evidence of these so called dissents? Links to support this claim?

Where did you read of this dissent? Or did you just wake up one morning and make all this up and decide it was fact and that you can speak for Hollywood circles?
 
BIKINIMOM said:
I dont understand your arguement about traditional families being endangered.

Not trying to be rude or a weisenheimer. I just honestly dont understand why someone's sexual preference endangers anyone else.

The traditional American family is vulnerable to a lot of outside influences today. Some economic, some cultural, some other types. The Gay Agenda (i.e., the normalization of homosexuality) is one such threat.

One potential manifestation of this would be Gay Marriage. If Gay Marriage became the law of the land it would have dilutive and negative affect on the traditional family in America.

Based on the results of every statewide vote on this issue so far most Americans agree with me. To acknowledge that is not homophobic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom