Differency between using an AI and A serm during PCT

[JohnnyWest]

The idea of a serm is to (very basicly) attach to the estrogen receptors but not activate them, therefore making your hypothalamus not realize there is estrogen in your body. Now an AI like letro eliminates %98 of estrogen through aromatase anzyme and I think %95+ through sulftase enzyme, so basicly there is no estrogen in your body.
So a serm makes your body think there is no estrogen where as an AI eliminates the estrogen all together, so shouldn't using an AI be just as or nearly as effective as a serm during PCT when used alone? Something I've been thinking about for a while now. Nolva and clomid have worked well for me many times and the addition of them is always a good idea, but I wonder if anyone hasever tested a theory like this. It seems to make sense.

 

[macrophage69alpha]

AI's have been shown to be effective, in HPGA restoral..... however that being said most of the clinicals are with non AAS users and there is limited (albeit very compelling) anecdotal evidence from a decent number of AAS users.

so yes the theory has been "tested".... though not with enough rigor for combination therapy to be discarded... yet.. even if it does become the standard-- it wont mean the some will still not need other types of "therapy" or combined "therapies" to restore HPGA.