Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Deca dick + viagra - a new study!!!

CYCLEON

New member
in May issue of the US journal of Urology


"A commisioned study recently completed by Hartcourt and James at Johns Hopkins University has come out with evidence that approximately 35-40% of male users under the age of 40 of the penile vasodialation drug Alprostadil (under the brand name Caverject) are men that frequently use the androgenic hormonal steroid Nandrolone. Nandrolone is a potent androgen used to prevent wasting in subjects who suffer from a number of illnesses, including HIV. While it has few undesirable side effects at low doses, Nandralone does effect the nerve cells responsible for erectile function and often results in complete inability to perform sexually. It is proposed that one of the primary contributing factors of the high correlation of use is the apparent widespread abuse of Nandrolone as a recreational drug in body building, where it is also known as Deca. The second part of the study will be completed in October and is focused on the expected high correlation of use between male users of Nandralone supplementation and users of the popular penile vasodialation drug Sildenafil Citrate (brand name Viagra)."
 
"and often results in complete inability to perform sexually."

hmm this doesn't sound like the 'very small population of deca users that are "hypersensative" that deca front runners keep telling us about.

2Thick, Decaman.. where arrrreee yooouuuuu?

:D
 
CYCLEON said:
in May issue of the US journal of Urology

"A commisioned study recently completed by Hartcourt and James at Johns Hopkins University has come out with evidence that approximately 35-40% of male users under the age of 40 of the penile vasodialation drug Alprostadil (under the brand name Caverject) are men that frequently use the androgenic hormonal steroid Nandrolone. While it has few undesirable side effects at low doses, Nandralone does effect the nerve cells responsible for erectile function and often results in complete inability to perform sexually. It is proposed that one of the primary contributing factors of the high correlation of use is the apparent widespread abuse of Nandrolone as a recreational drug in body building, where it is also known as Deca.
Kinda blows that whole "Deca Dick is a Myth" thing out of the water, doesn't it? That "OFTEN RESULTS IN COMPLETE INABILITY TO PERFORM SEXUALLY" thing is kind of a kick in the pants. Makes me wonder why we still debate the virtues of Deca only cycles.
 
35-40% thats a lot !!! Is their anu URL with the complete article ??? Cause before judging Deca so fast I'd like to know a little bit more.......
 
ALERT - the post above is completely fictional

Ok – before this goes to far, but I wish that Decaman and 2Thick had weighed in. I totally made this study up (though not the indications ;) ) to demonstrate how to many people on this board are stating or posting things on this board that they are not able to back up. Stating things as an opinion is one thing but referring in a definitive way or posting part of a study without being ready to provide checkable references for its origin is how urban legends are started. It is so much the more important IMO in cases like the above where there are so many predisposed to believe the information (including myself) without affirming its validity. I realize this is very hard to do in light of the vastly increasing number of posts. Yet I believe it is particularly important when so many newbies are gaining high posts on the chat board or bumping without putting in meaningful contributions then turning around and giving their “expert” opinion as if it were scientifically proven. Even those who we would all regard as experts often disagree on a wide number of issues (diff class of receptors, estrogenic qualities of anadrol, etc.) yet each have viable scientific reasons for their thinking.

Note: I am not really referring to posts by mods or knowledgeable vets – though even these often disagree for valid reasons. Sadly, while the mods and vets often spend a good deal of time and effort making sure that their answer is backed up or is buoyed by their previous research – many others are laying out their opinion or pseudo-science in a rapid fire,:destroy: decimating those who really need to learn. The point of my evening rant is, lets keep this awesome board as scientifically accurate as possible and not let it become a place where old wives tales are readily disseminated. If you are going to state facts – be ready to back them up! – otherwise simply state that’s its just an opinion!

Kudos to manny78 for asking for the link.

CYCLEON


PS
No laughing by 2Thick or Decaman, or I will commission the study mentioned above. You will care to notice that I said it was fictional, not false :D
 
Top Bottom