Creatine monohydrate vs creatine cell mass

[MikeLB333]

Wondering if anyone has taken these products and which one is just better overall???

 

[thedarkhalf]

Save your money. Go with the monohydrate.

 

[MrSupps.com]

Well i like mono and ethyl ester myself.

 

[JRSAC]

I agree with thedarkhalf, save your money and stick with mono. It has way more scientific backing... we know it's effective and safe, whereas the creatine ethyl ester in "cell mass" is much less-studied and more expensive.

 

[MikeLB333]

Yea I've gone with the monohydrate and like it.

Is powder or caps better? The only reason I went with the powder was because the main ingredient in the pill was rice flour

 

[IncredibleHoss]

what is a good creatine mono these days?

 

[thedarkhalf]

what is a good creatine mono these days?

Creatine Mono is creatine mono IMO. The only difference i've seen is that primaforce has a creatine mono that is more like a fluffy powder and mixes much better in water and dymatize/met-rx/etc have the usual granular creatine. Both work well. Mono is mono.