Controlling mass gain

[symsym]

Needing some advice from more seasoned members. I am looking to do a cycle this winter but can only put on a limited amount of weight.

Initially I planned on pinning a lower dose test prop cycle, but I respond very well to test in the past and acquire mass very fast. Would it be acceptable to take Turinabol in its place for the mild-moderate dry gains granted PCT other ancillaries are in order? Or would it be wiser to chance the test?

 

[dylangemelli]

in your instance i would go with any of the following... winstrol, anavar or tbol... you could also look into helladrol or epistane but if you need to be watching the weight gain then these would be your best option... you can put on size on any steroid, its how you diet and train with them that will determine how much is put on bro...

 

[Texas Monster]

An 8 week primo cycle would yield nice low dry gains.

 

[goin on 4T]

An 8 week primo cycle would yield nice low dry gains.

Don't do primo alone, either test or HCGenerate.

 

[joeblow12345]

I would go with a low dose test, a epistane kicker and a tbol finisher.
1-12 test e 250 mg week
1-6 epi 60 mg day
10-15 tbol 60 mg day
1-15 n2guard
4-10 hcgenerate
10-15 hcg
1-15 adex if needed
15-19 clomid 25mg day
15-19 postcycle/unleasged
15-19 DAA
19-22 bridge.



NTBM REP

 

[dylangemelli]

i really don't think that test is his best option here... he has to keep his weight at certain level and he already said that he put on too much size with test... an oral only cycle would be the best way to go for his goals...

 

[joeblow12345]

i really don't think that test is his best option here... he has to keep his weight at certain level and he already said that he put on too much size with test... an oral only cycle would be the best way to go for his goals...

I agree that test can pack on the lbs, but if diet is on point it should be fine at 250 mgs week. But if his eating habits are sketchy the oral is probably a safer choice.

NTBM REP

 

[stevesmi]

well what are your stats ?

you didn't give us any specific information, impossible to help you here.

var is a good one if you want to keep your size close to the same but add strength

 

[RADAR]

i really don't think that test is his best option here... he has to keep his weight at certain level and he already said that he put on too much size with test... an oral only cycle would be the best way to go for his goals...

Agree with Dylan here also like steve says Var is good but a tad expensive, Turnabol will make you hars and Strong with no additional sides. That would be my pick.

 

[ALIN]

Needing some advice from more seasoned members. I am looking to do a cycle this winter but can only put on a limited amount of weight.

Initially I planned on pinning a lower dose test prop cycle, but I respond very well to test in the past and acquire mass very fast. Would it be acceptable to take Turinabol in its place for the mild-moderate dry gains granted PCT other ancillaries are in order? Or would it be wiser to chance the test?

I wouldnt take the TBOL without using some additional testosterone.

 

[dylangemelli]

Agree with Dylan here also like steve says Var is good but a tad expensive, Turnabol will make you hars and Strong with no additional sides. That would be my pick.

good choice brother... i think tbol is a great option as well... every cycle does not have to have test involved to be successful... some people are not after 10-20 lbs. every cycle... that's not always the goal and so test isn't always necessary... it can definitely enhance things and make any cycle a fuck of a lot better but it's not conducive to everyone's goal... you are fine to run an oral only cycle considering what your goals are... when you want to put on more size, then run a test cycle bro...