Computer Question....

[buddy28]

For the techies....

The number of pxiel rows the monitor has to scan indirectly limits the maximum possible screen resolution by constraining the monitor refresh rate.

The larger the number of pixel rows the monitor has to scan, the slower the refresh rate.

Since the monitor refresh rate cannot be too slow, the screen resolution, or the number of pixel rows the monitor has to scan cannot be too large.

Is this right??

 

[ZKaudio]

Refresh rate has an indirect correlation with resolution... i.e. the higher the resolution, the lower the refresh rate. Resolution is generally limited by the monitors picture tube.. correct me if i'm wrong.

 

[buddy28]

but screen resolution is defined by the aggregate number of pixels or 'pixel rows' on the vertical axes. Right?

so screen resolution and aggregate number of screen pixels or pixel rows on the vertical axes, for this simplistic example, are synonemous.

making this statement,

Since the monitor refresh rate cannot be too slow, the screen resolution, or the number of pixel rows the monitor has to scan cannot be too large.

true??

 

[buddy28]

anyone else wanna jump in on this bad mamma jammaa

 

[ZKaudio]

depends if you have vsync on.. where the vertical refresh rate and the horizontal refresh rate are equal...