Colin is Layin' It Down for The U.N.

[hooch]

Trust me I'm not defending Liberals either......

But fuck it....looks like we are definately going to IRAQ...I hope its over quick....

 

[The Almighty]

Saddam doesnt have to have a "conventional" delivery system for his biological or chemical weapons.

If we wanted to attack the U.S. or Canada, all he has to do is hire a loyal follower, inject him with smallpox, and put him on a plane headed towards New York.

 

[chesty]

Freak monster, While your witicism is less than flattering to yourself,

We didn't enter WWII to save the Jews and I never said we did. Yes, the Treaty of Versailles and not Wilson was the culprit for the Germans state of affairs, but they brought it on themselves when the started WWI (yes, I know about the assasination of the Duke) Europe was floundering and in the midst of losing the war when we finally had had enough of German crap with the shippng lines and more and came in, whooped and won the war in a littler over a year.

WWII started with the expansionism of Hitler and the subsequent denial of this by the rest of the world. England was our allie, and we supported them.

I never agreed with nor supported the Blitzkrieg, it is a matter of fact that Hitler violently invaded Poland (smoking gun for you neophites) and then Japan bombed Pearl Harbor and well, the rest is history.

As for the female gender yeah, I called liberals pussies and I will do it again, Pussies! Weak minded, fools, waste of human flesh, etc.

As for fighting the war, don't even attempt to assume how I will participate in this war. My unit is already gone, and will be for at least two years or more. I have served my time on more than one occasion including Desert Storm, so don't even talk to me about that shit!

And of course you would quote Russell Crow. So what is it you do that is going to echo in eternity?

 

[chesty]

Oh yeah, as for wmd, VX can kill thousands upon thousands in a matter of days. So, yeah pin head, I would call that a wmd. And all that protective gear won't do shit after 24 hours, because that is all it is good for before you have to change filters and mop suit.

And yup, it sure is an area denial weapon, but only for a brief period of time. But not like a nuke.

As for bio weapons, ever seen ebola or other forms? Anthrax, well let''s just say that in the field by the time you find out, your already dead. How about Ricin? No known cure, we don't have cures for a lot of that stuff.

What about small pox. If you are not in the military you are not going to be vaccinated, and by the time you find out you got your dead or disfigured for life.

 

[chesty]

Also, we should worry about Korea? But why? What does that peninsula offer? Good farming? Cars? Industry? He may have a nuke or two, but given the level of technology and such, they try anything at that part of the world will be a lighthouse for about a thousand years.

As for the war in Iraq being quick. I don't know, it could go either way, but I am banking on being conservative and it lasting a while.

 

[Optimus B]

You mean he couldn't reach Canada, DAMN IT!


That was a joke Canada, well kinda. HAHAHOHO

HEY!!! we supply a shitload of your power not to mention timber, making us your #1 trade partner. now, if they wanted to nuke the raelians, i would see no problem.

love,
your neighbor, (as homer simpson calls us) america jr.

 

[Big Johnson]

If we do it right it should last a while.

 

[JohnyJuice]

Yup, the US doesn't care about WMP. They want a regime change in Iraq under any circumstances, which is illegal under international law. WTF does Iraq have to do with the US. Answer : Absolutely nothing, except that the US gets a lot of oil from Iraq.

Even IF Iraq has WMP (which have not been found), the only mass destroying Iraq would be able to do is to their neighbouring countries.

Even IF terrorists are operating out of Iraq, does that imply Iraq is somehow involved? There were plenty of terrorist cells in Germany, Italy, France, Canada, etc.. the US isn't attacking them. N Korea is a far more serious threat, they don't even deny having AND wanting to use nuclear weapons. Bush turns a blind eye to that, because N Korea doesn't have any oil.

I can see you ride the short bus with tinted windows, so i will help you out a little bit. We do not get alot of oil from Iraq. We never have. I believe the most we ever did was something to the effect of 5%. We want a regime change because the sactions we imposed were meant to starve his weapons programs and military. Instead he just lets his people starve to death, and keeps his war machine going. Your argument about terrorists organizations operationing in countries such as spain and italy is retarded. Yes, cells may exist in these countries, but these countries sure as hell dont want them there. They are activly wiping them out. Iraq is not. It is likely that iraq is supplying weapons and training to these people. It is also a fact that Saddam gives money to the families of suicide bombers. I dont remember the president of Italy doing that.
And as far as your stupid ass comment on N. Korea... god damn you are dense. Let me ask you, do you think there is a reason we are dealing with iraq first, the N. Korea? I will help you out again. 1 of them is already nuclear. The other is attempting to go nuclear. So should we take on the nuclear power first (n. korea), and in the mean time Iraq gets to nuclear status. Then we take on Iraq, which has had time to build its arsenal and go nuclear. End result = fighting 2 nuclear powers.
Or we do option 2. Take on the non nuclear first, before they get there. Establish position closer to N. Korea, on a different front. Then take on Nuclear power. conclusion from 2nd method = fight one jerk off non nuclear power, then 1 nuclear power.

I think the second option makes more sense. And what makes you think we are turning a blind eye to N. Korea? We just sent bombers to position themselves closer. N.Korea is going to gewt dealt with, you wait and see. Remember Iraq's nuclear plant, and what happened to it.....

 

[vinylgroover]

Dont forget america and britain too. And were did you get half from?? US was the main supplier of WMD to sadam in the 80's, despite his behaviour towards his people. However the US has just maracuiosly discovered that Sadam needs removing now??MMMM

This argument for war is beyond a joke, considering Israel has defined more UN reseloutions than Iraq in regards to the Palestinians, invaded 5 of its neighbours therefore creating more instability in the ME......

NKorea has just reactivated its nuculer facilities and unlike Iraq there is clear proof that they have WMD.

The double standards with other countries prove without a doubt that Americas real motive is not what they say it is.
Because if it was to rid the world of WMD the first stop they would have to make in order to bomb would be the white house for supplying him with most of the weapons in the first place.

Well said.

While i have no time for Saddam and his regime, the US has to show it's acting without prejudice and come down hard on North Korea, Iran, Sudan etc etc.

It destroys any credible argument the Bush administration has for attacking Iraq when they turn a blind eye to defiance from other countries.

 

[The Almighty]

While i have no time for Saddam and his regime, the US has to show it's acting without prejudice and come down hard on North Korea, Iran, Sudan etc etc.

Add Saudi Arabia to that list and Ill agree 100%