Chopping up VAGINAS

[chewyxrage]

this "Clit Camp" that was mentioned.....wonder what the staff looks like and how much hands on instruction there is......

lol I was planning to comment on this clit camp as well

 

[Robert Jan]

Fuck it , they already cut bits off males' genitals in the States for beauty reasons....course the kids don't have any say in it at the time...

Nobody is saying the vagina operations should be banned

 

[Burning_Inside]

you guys ever see that HBO special a few years back, well it may have been on Real Sex..But these couples go to "sex camp" we will call it. and they sit around in the grass and these hippyish instructors show charts with drawings on them of the different "kinds" of penii vagini. Like there's the "bear cock" and the "horse cock" "deer cock", etc. and they are supposedly specially suited for other like-named vaginas.

HILARIOUS

 

[JT Iron]

neat thread title

 

[PoonRaider]

Im not even going to bother clicking that link. . .
I'm sure its something I would rather not see.

 

[Mandinka2]

Nobody is saying the vagina operations should be banned

Why should they ban them ? The surgeries are elective..... they are not forced upon them by other parties - in that case then of course (as in the male circ case ) it would be imposed mutilation. People are free to do all manner of silly things - stick pieces of metal in their bodies , smoke cigarettes - some people even wear sunglasses on their hair (man do I hate that) , but they have the freedom to make all of these choices themselves...

In any case I'm for banning it unless it's post birthing and/or there is a serious issue which could be considered to be affecting the organ's performance and not merely an attempt to attain some ridiculous ideal like Lucia Tovar's.

I'm also against fake tits for the record.

 

[Buddy_Christ]

I'm also against fake tits for the record.

i'm against disgustingly large fake tits.

however, if the fake tits are done tastefully they're ok. i like mine around 36C, 38D, firm, and self supporting. fake or not, it's ok with me.

but even then, they're mearly hood ornaments. i'm mostly after what's between the legs. a "mutilated" vagina is not my idea of something good to be sticking it in.


still waiting for details on Clit Camp.

 

[thelegacy again]

Burning Inside---do you have any background of those Bible verses that you have down>??? Do you know that when God spoke to Moses in Exodus it was through burning bush or in this case a pillar of smoke----When the Lord says "face to face" in this contexts He is NOT refering to a literal human face to face looking at eachother for Exodus 34:20 states "You cannot see my face, for no one may see me and live" which also clears up John 1:18,. Also, what TRANSLATION of the Bible are you using to get Isaiah 45:7. What you are intending is "I bring prosperity and create disaster; I the Lord do these things." There is a huge difference between disaster and evil. Point one scripture where God creates evil (what I mean is sin NOT disaster)..Check the contexts of the scriptures before you start typing them down cuz anyone with simple Bible knowledge knows what those scriptures actually mean.

 

[Burning_Inside]

Burning Inside---do you have any background of those Bible verses that you have down>??? Do you know that when God spoke to Moses in Exodus it was through burning bush or in this case a pillar of smoke----When the Lord says "face to face" in this contexts He is NOT refering to a literal human face to face looking at eachother for Exodus 34:20 states "You cannot see my face, for no one may see me and live" which also clears up John 1:18,. Also, what TRANSLATION of the Bible are you using to get Isaiah 45:7. What you are intending is "I bring prosperity and create disaster; I the Lord do these things." There is a huge difference between disaster and evil. Point one scripture where God creates evil (what I mean is sin NOT disaster)..Check the contexts of the scriptures before you start typing them down cuz anyone with simple Bible knowledge knows what those scriptures actually mean.

Look, there's 29 times in the bible that says Geo Double D appeared to, and spoke to someone, and there's 6 times that it says there's no way god will ever be seen or has been seen by anyone ever. So which is it? How do you know in what context something is supposed to be taken? let me guess the context that suits your arguement, right?

I know what the quote was referring to, it's an example of the stupidity that lies in the pages of that book. It says one thing here, oh but look, then something else there, oh jeez, now this says something else altogether, hmm so which to believe? Ah yes of course, we will take it in the manner that we feel suits us best.

You know, if you sum up in one word what you get when you sit down and really truly make heads or tales of that book, the word you get is "sucker".

Now stop hijacking my thread. Talk about vagina operations.

 

[Robert Jan]

Who the hell brought the stupid fucking bible into this.